OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effects of a vascular-disrupting agent on rodent tumour models. METHODS: Twenty rats with liver rhabdomyosarcomas received ZD6126 intravenously at 20 mg/kg, and 10 vehicle-treated rats were used as controls. Multiple sequences, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) with the microvascular permeability constant (K), were acquired at baseline, 1 h, 24 h and 48 h post-treatment by using 1.5-T MRI. [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose micro-positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG microPET) was acquired pre- and post-treatment. The imaging biomarkers including tumour volume, enhancement ratio, necrosis ratio, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and K from MRI, and maximal standardised uptake value (SUV(max)) from FDG microPET were quantified and correlated with postmortem microangiography and histopathology. RESULTS: In the ZD6126-treated group, tumours grew slower with higher necrosis ratio at 48 h (P < 0.05), corresponding well to histopathology; tumour K decreased from 1 h until 24 h, and partially recovered at 48 h (P < 0.05), parallel to the evolving enhancement ratios (P < 0.05); ADCs varied with tumour viability and perfusion; and SUV(max) dropped at 24 h (P < 0.01). Relative K of tumour versus liver at 48 h correlated with relative vascular density on microangiography (r = 0.93, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The imaging biomarkers allowed morphological, functional and metabolic quantifications of vascular shutdown, necrosis formation and tumour relapse shortly after treatment. A single dose of ZD6126 significantly diminished tumour blood supply and growth until 48 h post-treatment.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effects of a vascular-disrupting agent on rodent tumour models. METHODS: Twenty rats with liver rhabdomyosarcomas received ZD6126 intravenously at 20 mg/kg, and 10 vehicle-treated rats were used as controls. Multiple sequences, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) with the microvascular permeability constant (K), were acquired at baseline, 1 h, 24 h and 48 h post-treatment by using 1.5-T MRI. [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose micro-positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG microPET) was acquired pre- and post-treatment. The imaging biomarkers including tumour volume, enhancement ratio, necrosis ratio, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and K from MRI, and maximal standardised uptake value (SUV(max)) from FDG microPET were quantified and correlated with postmortem microangiography and histopathology. RESULTS: In the ZD6126-treated group, tumours grew slower with higher necrosis ratio at 48 h (P < 0.05), corresponding well to histopathology; tumour K decreased from 1 h until 24 h, and partially recovered at 48 h (P < 0.05), parallel to the evolving enhancement ratios (P < 0.05); ADCs varied with tumour viability and perfusion; and SUV(max) dropped at 24 h (P < 0.01). Relative K of tumour versus liver at 48 h correlated with relative vascular density on microangiography (r = 0.93, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The imaging biomarkers allowed morphological, functional and metabolic quantifications of vascular shutdown, necrosis formation and tumour relapse shortly after treatment. A single dose of ZD6126 significantly diminished tumour blood supply and growth until 48 h post-treatment.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: G M Tozer; V E Prise; J Wilson; R J Locke; B Vojnovic; M R Stratford; M F Dennis; D J Chaplin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1999-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Harriet C Thoeny; Frederik De Keyzer; Vincent Vandecaveye; Feng Chen; Xihe Sun; Hilde Bosmans; Robert Hermans; Eric K Verbeken; Chris Boesch; Guy Marchal; Willy Landuyt; Yicheng Ni Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-09-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lieselot Brepoels; Sigrid Stroobants; Peter Vandenberghe; Karoline Spaepen; Patrick Dupont; Johan Nuyts; Guy Bormans; Luc Mortelmans; Gregor Verhoef; Christiane De Wolf-Peeters Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Peter D Davis; Graeme J Dougherty; David C Blakey; Susan M Galbraith; Gillian M Tozer; Angela L Holder; Matthew A Naylor; John Nolan; Michael R L Stratford; David J Chaplin; Sally A Hill Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Yewei Liu; Ting Yin; Yuanbo Feng; Marlein Miranda Cona; Gang Huang; Jianjun Liu; Shaoli Song; Yansheng Jiang; Qian Xia; Johannes V Swinnen; Guy Bormans; Uwe Himmelreich; Raymond Oyen; Yicheng Ni Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2015-10
Authors: Feng Chen; Frederik De Keyzer; Yuan-Bo Feng; Marlein Miranda Cona; Jie Yu; Guy Marchal; Raymond Oyen; Yi-Cheng Ni Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-12-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Louisa Bokacheva; Ellen Ackerstaff; H Carl LeKaye; Kristen Zakian; Jason A Koutcher Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 3.609