Literature DB >> 20182433

Infant outcomes of certified nurse midwife attended home births: United States 2000 to 2004.

M H Malloy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Home births attended by certified nurse midwives (CNMs) make up an extremely small proportion of births in the United States (<1.0%) and are not supported by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG). The primary objective of this analysis was to examine the safety of certified nurse midwife attended home deliveries compared with certified nurse midwife in-hospital deliveries in the United States as measured by the risk of adverse infant outcomes among women with term, singleton, vaginal deliveries. STUDY
DESIGN: United States linked birth and infant death files for the years 2000 to 2004 were used for the analysis. Adverse neonatal outcomes including death were determined by place of birth and attendant type for in-hospital certified nurse midwife, in-hospital 'other' midwife, home certified nurse midwife, home 'other' midwife, and free-standing birth center certified nurse midwife deliveries. RESULT: For the 5-year period there were 1 237 129 in-hospital certified nurse midwife attended births; 17 389 in-hospital 'other' midwife attended births; 13 529 home certified nurse midwife attended births; 42 375 home 'other' midwife attended births; and 25 319 birthing center certified nurse midwife attended births. The neonatal mortality rate per 1000 live births for each of these categories was, respectively, 0.5 (deaths=614), 0.4 (deaths=7), 1.0 (deaths=14), 1.8 (deaths=75), and 0.6 (deaths=16). The adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for neonatal mortality for home certified nurse midwife attended deliveries vs in-hospital certified nurse midwife attended deliveries was 2.02 (1.18, 3.45).
CONCLUSION: Deliveries at home attended by CNMs and 'other midwives' were associated with higher risks for mortality than deliveries in-hospital by CNMs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20182433     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2010.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  6 in total

1.  Interpreting evidence: why values can matter as much as science.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Kristen Intemann
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  Policy statement on planned home birth: upholding the best interests of children and families.

Authors:  Kristi L Watterberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Unexpected complications of low-risk pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  Valery A Danilack; Anthony P Nunes; Maureen G Phipps
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Outcomes of hospitalization in pregnant women with CNS neoplasms: a population-based study.

Authors:  Anna R Terry; Fred G Barker; Lisa Leffert; Brian T Bateman; Irene Souter; Scott R Plotkin
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Determinants of Place of Delivery during the COVID-19 Pandemic-Internet Survey in Polish Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Mateusz Strózik; Lukasz Szarpak; Ishag Adam; Jacek Smereka
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.948

6.  Describing Prehospital Deliveries in the State of Michigan.

Authors:  David Eisenbrey; Robert B Dunne; William Fales; Kristopher Torossian; Robert Swor
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.