Literature DB >> 20182114

Engaging students in dedicated research and scholarship during medical school: the long-term experiences at Duke and Stanford.

Daniel T Laskowitz1, Robert P Drucker, Julie Parsonnet, Patricia C Cross, Neil Gesundheit.   

Abstract

For more than 40 years, the faculties of Duke University School of Medicine (SOM) and Stanford University SOM have encouraged or required students to engage in scholarship as a way to broaden their education and attract them to careers in academic medicine. A dedicated period of research was first integrated into the Duke curriculum in 1959 to provide an opportunity for students to develop into physician leaders through a rigorous scholarly experience in biomedically related research. Originally designed to foster experience in laboratory-based basic research, the third-year program has evolved in response to the changing landscape of medicine and shifting needs and career interests of the medical student population. Stanford University SOM also has a long-standing commitment to biomedical research and currently requires each student to complete an in-depth, mentored "scholarly concentration." In contrast to Duke, where most of the scholarly research experiences take place in an immersive third year, the Stanford program encourages a longitudinal, multiyear exposure over all four (or five) years of medical school. Although the enduring effects of embedding a rigorous research program are not yet fully known, preliminary data suggest that these experiences instill an appreciation for research, impart research rigor and methodologies, and may motivate students to pursue careers in academic medicine. The authors discuss the histories, evolution, logistics, and ongoing challenges of the research programs at Duke University SOM and Stanford University SOM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20182114     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccc77a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  43 in total

1.  Student scientific inquiry in the core curriculum.

Authors:  Georgeta D Vaidean; Sandeep S Vansal; Ronnie J Moore; Stuart Feldman
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Longitudinal Service Learning in Medical Education: An Ethical Analysis of the Five-Year Alternative Curriculum at Stritch School of Medicine.

Authors:  Brian F Borah
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2018-12

3.  Propagating the nephrology research workforce: a Kidney Research National Dialogue training commentary.

Authors:  Donald E Kohan; Mark G Parker; Susan L Furth; Billy G Hudson; Karen M Warburton; Krystyna E Rys-Sikora; Tracy L Rankin
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  St George's University's Medical Student Research Institute: A Novel, Virtual Programme for Medical Research Collaboration.

Authors:  R S Chamberlain; Z Klaassen; M C Meadows; S Weitzman; M Loukas
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 0.171

5.  Impact of elective versus required medical school research experiences on career outcomes.

Authors:  Alice N Weaver; Tyler R McCaw; Matthew Fifolt; Lisle Hites; Robin G Lorenz
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  An innovative portfolio of research training programs for medical students.

Authors:  Karen Zier; Christina Wyatt; David Muller
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.829

7.  Determining Expected Research Skills of Medical Students on Graduation: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Melissa G Y Lee; Wendy C Y Hu; Justin L C Bilszta
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-08-31

Review 8.  Teaching Medical Research to Medical Students: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gabriel Sheng Jie Lee; Yip Han Chin; Aimei Amy Jiang; Cheng Han Mg; Kameswara Rishi Yeshayahu Nistala; Shridhar Ganpathi Iyer; Shuh Shing Lee; Choon Seng Chong; Dujeepa D Samarasekera
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-01-08

9.  U.S. Physician-Scientist Workforce in the 21st Century: Recommendations to Attract and Sustain the Pipeline.

Authors:  Robert A Salata; Mark W Geraci; Don C Rockey; Melvin Blanchard; Nancy J Brown; Lucien J Cardinal; Maria Garcia; Michael P Madaio; James D Marsh; Robert F Todd
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Outcomes From the NIH Clinical Research Training Program: A Mentored Research Experience to Enhance Career Development of Clinician-Scientists.

Authors:  Frederick P Ognibene; John I Gallin; Bruce J Baum; Richard G Wyatt; Michael M Gottesman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.