Literature DB >> 20181548

Ultrasonic coagulator for thyroidectomy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Zong-jiu Zhang1, Peng Zhang, Jin-hui Tian, Jun Li, Lun Li, Jing Tian, Ke-hu Yang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of ultrasonic coagulator for thyroidectomy.
METHODS: randomized controlled trials were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCI, Chinese Biomedical Database, China Academic Journals Full-Text Database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, and China Online Journals. The authors evaluated the quality of included studies by Handbook 5.0.0, and analyzed data by Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0.
RESULTS: A total of 11 RCTs with 1420 patients met the criteria. Between ultrasonic coagulator and conventional technique, there were significant differences in operative time of total thyroidectomy (P < .00001) and amount of intraoperative bleeding (P = .02). There were no significant differences in operative time of part thyroidectomy (P = .07), amount of postoperative drainage (P = .18), cases of transient hypocalcemia (P = .41), cases of transient recurrent nerve paresis (P = .21), and total cost in hospital (P = .08).
CONCLUSIONS: Current studies demonstrate that ultrasonic coagulator has a significant reduction on the operating time of total thyroidectomy and the amount of intraoperative bleeding in thyroidectomy, without increasing complications and total cost in hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20181548     DOI: 10.1177/1553350610362084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Intraoperative complications of neck surgery].

Authors:  D Simon; M Lassau; P Schmidt-Wilcke; M Boucher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  ENERgized vessel sealing systems versus CONventional hemostasis techniques in thyroid surgery--the ENERCON systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pietro Contin; Käthe Gooßen; Kathrin Grummich; Katrin Jensen; Hubertus Schmitz-Winnenthal; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Harmonic versus LigaSure hemostasis technique in thyroid surgery: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arun Upadhyaya; Tianpeng Hu; Zhaowei Meng; Xue Li; Xianghui He; Weijun Tian; Qiang Jia; Jian Tan
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-05-26

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic Focus in thyroidectomy compared to conventional techniques.

Authors:  Hang Cheng; Ireena Soleas; Nicole C Ferko; Jeffrey W Clymer; Joseph F Amaral
Journal:  Thyroid Res       Date:  2015-10-01

Review 5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hang Cheng; Jeffrey W Clymer; Nicole C Ferko; Leena Patel; Ireena M Soleas; Chris G Cameron; Piet Hinoul
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2016-07-18

6.  Comparison of harmonic blade versus traditional approach in canine patients undergoing spinal decompressive surgery for naturally occurring thoracolumbar disk extrusion.

Authors:  Bianca F Hettlich; Laurie Cook; Cheryl London; Geoffrey T Fosgate
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Alternative sources of cautery may improve post-operative hematoma rates but increase operative time in thyroid surgery.

Authors:  Corliss A E Best; Alexandra E Quimby; Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Procedure costs associated with the use of Harmonic devices compared to conventional techniques in various surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hang Cheng; Jeffrey W Clymer; Rana A Qadeer; Nicole Ferko; Behnam Sadeghirad; Chris G Cameron; Joseph F Amaral
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-07-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.