Literature DB >> 18234229

Intracranial pressure and ventricular expansion in hydrocephalus: have we been asking the wrong question?

David N Levine1.   

Abstract

The force that enlarges the cerebral ventricles and deforms the brain in hydrocephalus remains unclear. It is still widely thought to be elevated intraventricular pressure developing behind an obstruction to the flow of CSF. This view has led to the prediction that a large pressure difference should exist between the ventricles proximal to the obstruction and the subarachnoid space of the cerebral convexity distal to the obstruction. Yet measurements have shown consistently that such transmantle pressure differences are either small or absent. We propose a theory that reconciles the view that hydrocephalus is caused by obstruction to the flow of CSF with the observed absence of large pressure gradients across the cerebral mantle. Obstruction to CSF flow produces only a small pressure gradient -- usually less than 1 mm Hg -- that is sufficient to overcome the added resistance to flow and thereby to balance the absorption of CSF with its production. This mini-gradient is the effective force that initiates and sustains ventricular enlargement. It can coexist either with high or with normal intracranial pressure. The level of intracranial pressure is determined by the efficiency with which increments of ventricular pressure are transmitted through the parenchyma to the outer surface of the brain. In the presence of a rigid skull some transmission is required by basic laws of Newtonian mechanics. The efficiency of transmission depends primarily on the elastic properties of the brain. If the brain is relatively incompressible, transmission is efficient and high intracranial pressure is required to maintain the mini-gradient between the ventricles and the subarachnoid space, resulting in tension hydrocephalus. If the brain is more compressible, the parenchyma attenuates any increase of intraventricular pressure, reducing transmission to the outer surface. Intracranial pressure need not rise above normal levels to maintain the mini-gradient, leading to normal pressure hydrocephalus. The theory explains why tests measuring CSF resistance have limited diagnostic usefulness in hydrocephalus. It also predicts that very small stresses are sufficient to produce large deformations of the brain if these are allowed to occur slowly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18234229     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  21 in total

Review 1.  Updated physiology and pathophysiology of CSF circulation--the pulsatile vector theory.

Authors:  M Preuss; K-T Hoffmann; M Reiss-Zimmermann; W Hirsch; A Merkenschlager; J Meixensberger; M Dengl
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Alteration of brain viscoelasticity after shunt treatment in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Florian Baptist Freimann; Kaspar-Josche Streitberger; Dieter Klatt; Kui Lin; Joyce McLaughlin; Jürgen Braun; Christian Sprung; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Prediction of intracranial hypertension through noninvasive intracranial pressure waveform analysis in pediatric hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Matheus Fernando Manzolli Ballestero; Gustavo Frigieri; Brenno Caetano Troca Cabella; Sergio Mascarenhas de Oliveira; Ricardo Santos de Oliveira
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Anti-biofouling implantable catheter using thin-film magnetic microactuators.

Authors:  Qi Yang; Hyunsu Park; Tran N H Nguyen; Jeffrey F Rhoads; Albert Lee; R Timothy Bentley; Jack W Judy; Hyowon Lee
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 7.460

5.  Interaction between ventricular expansion and structural changes in the corpus callosum and putamen in males with FMR1 normal and premutation alleles.

Authors:  Jun Yi Wang; David Hessl; Flora Tassone; Kyoungmi Kim; Randi J Hagerman; Susan M Rivera
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  A MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS THAT MODULATE PRESSURE GRADIENTS AND FACILITATE VENTRICULAR EXPANSION IN HYDROCEPHALUS.

Authors:  Kathleen P Wilkie; Gurjit Nagra; Miles Johnston
Journal:  Int J Numer Anal Model B       Date:  2012

Review 7.  Transmantle and transvenous pressure gradients in cerebrospinal fluid disorders.

Authors:  Mendel Castle-Kirszbaum; Tony Goldschlager
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Transmantle Pressure Computed from MR Imaging Measurements of Aqueduct Flow and Dimensions.

Authors:  S J Sincomb; W Coenen; E Criado-Hidalgo; K Wei; K King; M Borzage; V Haughton; A L Sánchez; J C Lasheras
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.966

9.  Elevated CSF outflow resistance associated with impaired lymphatic CSF absorption in a rat model of kaolin-induced communicating hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Gurjit Nagra; Mark E Wagshul; Shams Rashid; Jie Li; J Pat McAllister; Miles Johnston
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2010-02-10

10.  Progressive cognitive impairment evolving to dementia parallels parieto-occipital and temporal enlargement in idiopathic chronic hydrocephalus: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paolo Missori; Antonio Currà
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.