Literature DB >> 20180632

Non-animal sensitization testing: state-of-the-art.

Rob J Vandebriel1, Henk van Loveren.   

Abstract

Predictive tests to identify the sensitizing properties of chemicals are carried out using animals. In the European Union timelines for phasing out many standard animal tests were established for cosmetics. Following this policy, the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH) favors alternative methods, if validated and appropriate. In this review the authors aim to provide a state-of-the art overview of alternative methods (in silico, in chemico, and in vitro) to identify contact and respiratory sensitizing capacity and in some occasions give a measure of potency. The past few years have seen major advances in QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationship) models where especially mechanism-based models have great potential, peptide reactivity assays where multiple parameters can be measured simultaneously, providing a more complete reactivity profile, and cell-based assays. Several cell-based assays are in development, not only using different cell types, but also several specifically developed assays such as three-dimenionally (3D)-reconstituted skin models, an antioxidant response reporter assay, determination of signaling pathways, and gene profiling. Some of these assays show relatively high sensitivity and specificity for a large number of sensitizers and should enter validation (or are indeed entering this process). Integrating multiple assays in a decision tree or integrated testing system is a next step, but has yet to be developed. Adequate risk assessment, however, is likely to require significantly more time and efforts.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20180632     DOI: 10.3109/10408440903524262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  7 in total

1.  Tri-culture system for pro-hapten sensitizer identification and potency classification.

Authors:  Serom Lee; Talia Greenstein; Lingting Shi; Tim Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin Yarmush
Journal:  Technology (Singap World Sci)       Date:  2018-06-29

2.  Spineless solutions: The potential of invertebrate animal models for advancing science in the developing world.

Authors:  Armando Castillo; Yila de la Guardia
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  Methyl methacrylate and respiratory sensitization: a critical review.

Authors:  Jonathan Borak; Cheryl Fields; Larry S Andrews; Mark A Pemberton
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Chemical toxicity prediction for major classes of industrial chemicals: Is it possible to develop universal models covering cosmetics, drugs, and pesticides?

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Eugene N Muratov; Alexey Zakharov; Nail N Muratov; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 6.023

5.  Perspectives on Non-Animal Alternatives for Assessing Sensitization Potential in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Nripen S Sharma; Rohit Jindal; Bhaskar Mitra; Serom Lee; Lulu Li; Tim J Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.321

Review 6.  Animal use in pharmacology education and research: the changing scenario.

Authors:  Dinesh K Badyal; Chetna Desai
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.200

7.  SkinSensDB: a curated database for skin sensitization assays.

Authors:  Chia-Chi Wang; Ying-Chi Lin; Shan-Shan Wang; Chieh Shih; Yi-Hui Lin; Chun-Wei Tung
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.514

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.