Literature DB >> 20180244

A study of the efficacy of bacterial biofilm cleanout for gastrointestinal endoscopes.

Ying Fang1, Zhe Shen, Lan Li, Yong Cao, Li-Ying Gu, Qing Gu, Xiao-Qi Zhong, Chao-Hui Yu, You-Ming Li.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the influence and clearance effect of enzymatic and non-enzymatic detergents against Escherichia coli (E. coli) biofilm on the inner surface of gastroscopes.
METHODS: Teflon tubes were incubated in a mixture of different detergents and E. coli culture (10(6) CFU/mL) for 72 h at 15 degrees C, and biofilms on the inner surface of the teflon tubes were analyzed by bacterial count and scanning electron microscopy. To evaluate the clearance effect of detergents, after biofilms were formed on the inner surface of Teflon tubes by 72 h lavage with E. coli culture, tubes were lavaged by enzymatic and non-enzymatic detergents at a speed of 250 mL/min, then biofilms on the inner surface were analyzed by bacterial count and scanning electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Non-enzymatic detergent had a better inhibition function on biofilm formation than enzymatic detergent as it reduced bacterial burden by 2.4 log compared with the control samples (P = 0.00). Inhibition function of enzymatic detergent was not significantly different to that of control samples and reduced bacterial burden by 0.2 log on average (P > 0.05). After lavaging at 250 mL/min for 3 min, no living bacteria were left in the tubes. Scanning electron microscopy observation showed biofilms became very loose by the high shear force effect.
CONCLUSION: Non-enzymatic detergent has a better inhibition effect on biofilm formation at room temperature. High speed pre-lavage and detergents are very important in temporal formed biofilm elimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20180244      PMCID: PMC2828589          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.1019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  19 in total

1.  APIC guideline for infection prevention and control in flexible endoscopy. Association for Professionals in Infection Control.

Authors:  C J Alvarado; M Reichelderfer
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 2.  The microbial flora of the gastrointestinal tract and the cleaning of flexible endoscopes.

Authors:  N S Chu; M Favero
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2000-04

3.  Bacterial biofilms and infections. Slimebusters.

Authors:  M Chicurel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Biofilms: their impact on health and their recalcitrance toward biocides.

Authors:  P Gilbert; A J McBain
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Cleaning efficacy of nine different cleaners in a washer-disinfector designed for flexible endoscopes.

Authors:  B Zühlsdorf; M Emmrich; H Floss; H Martiny
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Using an efficient biofilm detaching agent: an essential step for the improvement of endoscope reprocessing protocols.

Authors:  K Marion; J Freney; G James; E Bergeron; F N R Renaud; J W Costerton
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Extrinsic allergic alveolitis from a proteolytic enzyme.

Authors:  A Tripathi; L C Grammer
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 8.  Water, water everywhere nor any a sterile drop to rinse your endoscope.

Authors:  W G MacKay; A T Leanord; C L Williams
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules.

Authors:  Aniko Pajkos; Anand K Deva; Karen Vickery; Charles Cope; Lionel Chang; Yvonne E Cossart
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  Biofilms and device-associated infections.

Authors:  R M Donlan
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

2.  Using surface plasmon resonance imaging to study bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Pegah N Abadian; Nil Tandogan; John J Jamieson; Edgar D Goluch
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 3.  Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Julia Kovaleva; Frans T M Peters; Henny C van der Mei; John E Degener
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Antimicrobial Pressure of Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin on Biofilm Development by an Endoscope-Isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Idalina Machado; Joana Graça; Hélder Lopes; Susana Lopes; Maria O Pereira
Journal:  ISRN Biotechnol       Date:  2012-08-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.