Literature DB >> 16919846

Using an efficient biofilm detaching agent: an essential step for the improvement of endoscope reprocessing protocols.

K Marion1, J Freney, G James, E Bergeron, F N R Renaud, J W Costerton.   

Abstract

Biofilms develop inside endoscope channels even when valid endoscope reprocessing protocols are applied. The use of an efficient biocide is not sufficient if the channels are not cleaned thoroughly prior to disinfection. This study compared new anti-biofilm combinations of detachment promoting agents with a cleaning product in current use. Tests were performed using Teflon tubing and a contamination device that reproduces conditions that are prevalent during endoscopy. Products were subjected to static+brushing or dynamic treatments, and their ability to remove a preformed biofilm was assessed. The residual biofilm after treatment was assessed and compared with untreated controls. The percentage of surface covered by biofilm was measured after staining with crystal violet. Culturable bacteria levels were determined by plating the bacteria scraped from the tubing surface and counting the colony-forming units (CFU). Further tests were performed on actual endoscopes that had been contaminated artificially. Biofilm removal was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. This study showed that the new anti-biofilm products prevented the build-up of biofilm and removed a mature biofilm (approximately 10(8)CFU/cm(2)), whereas protocols based on detergent-disinfectants containing quaternary ammonium compounds showed low efficacy as these protocols and products fixed the biofilm on the endoscope surfaces. The new procedure and agents represent a new approach to biofilm control that may improve the efficacy of endoscope reprocessing, and reduce the risk of transmitting infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16919846     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  8 in total

Review 1.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

2.  A study of the efficacy of bacterial biofilm cleanout for gastrointestinal endoscopes.

Authors:  Ying Fang; Zhe Shen; Lan Li; Yong Cao; Li-Ying Gu; Qing Gu; Xiao-Qi Zhong; Chao-Hui Yu; You-Ming Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Microplate fluorescence assay for measurement of the ability of strains of Listeria monocytogenes from meat and meat-processing plants to adhere to abiotic surfaces.

Authors:  Rachel Gamble; Peter M Muriana
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Escaping the biofilm in more than one way: desorption, detachment or dispersion.

Authors:  Olga E Petrova; Karin Sauer
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 7.934

5.  EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor (ECR) simulated-use and clinical-use evaluation of cleaning efficacy.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Pat DeGagne; Nancy Olson; Iram Fatima
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Antimicrobial Pressure of Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin on Biofilm Development by an Endoscope-Isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Idalina Machado; Joana Graça; Hélder Lopes; Susana Lopes; Maria O Pereira
Journal:  ISRN Biotechnol       Date:  2012-08-28

7.  Steps of reprocessing and equipments.

Authors:  Yong Kook Lee; Jeong Bae Park
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-05-31

8.  Modeling microbial survival in buildup biofilm for complex medical devices.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Rosemarie Howie
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.090

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.