Literature DB >> 17645481

Extracolonic findings in an asymptomatic screening population undergoing intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography colonography.

Young Sun Kim1, Nayoung Kim, Soo Young Kim, Kyoung Soo Cho, Min Jung Park, Seung Ho Choi, Seon Hee Lim, Jeong Yoon Yim, Kyung Ran Cho, Chung Hyeon Kim, Dong Hee Kim, Sun Sin Kim, Jeong Hoon Kim, Byung Inhn Choi, Hyun Chae Jung, In Sung Song, Chan Soo Shin, Sang-Heon Cho, Byung-Hee Oh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate extracolonic findings that could be encountered with computed tomography colonography (CTC) using intravenous (IV) contrast material in an asymptomatic screening population.
METHODS: Intravenous contrast medium-enhanced CTC was performed in 2230 asymptomatic adults (mean age, 57.5 years). Axial images were prospectively examined for extracolonic lesions. These findings were classified into three categories: potentially important findings, likely unimportant findings, and clinically unimportant findings. Potentially important extracolonic findings were defined as those which required immediate further diagnostic studies and treatment. Clinical and radiologic follow up, missed lesions and clinical outcomes were assessed using medical records (mean duration of follow up, 1.6 years).
RESULTS: A total of 115 new potentially important findings in 5.2% of subjects (115/2230) were found. Subsequent medical or surgical intervention was performed in 2.0% (45/2230). New extracolonic cancer was detected in 0.5% (12/2230), and the majority of them (83.3%) were not metastasized. Computed tomography colonography missed eight potentially important extracolonic findings in eight subjects (0.4%, 8/2230): 0.8-cm early-stage prostatic cancer, six adrenal mass and one intraductal papillary mucinous tumor. There were no severe life-threatening complications related to contrast medium.
CONCLUSION: Intravenous contrast-enhanced CTC could safely detect asymptomatic early-stage extracolonic malignant diseases without an unreasonable number of additional work-ups, thus reducing their morbidity or mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17645481     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05060.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  7 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomographic colonography: hope or hype?

Authors:  Otto Schiueh-Tzang Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Extracolonic findings at CT colonography in an oncological hospital setting and why they matter.

Authors:  John M Ward; Burcin Agridag Ucpinar; Maria Clara Fernandes; Junting Zheng; Marinela Capanu; Natalie Gangai; Marc J Gollub; Natally Horvat
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.420

3.  Potentially Important Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography: Incidence and Outcomes Data From a Clinical Screening Program.

Authors:  B Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  CT colonography for population screening of colorectal cancer: hints from European trials.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Is intravenous contrast necessary for detection of clinically significant extracolonic findings in patients undergoing CT colonography?

Authors:  T Y Yau; Laa Alkandari; B Haaland; W Low; C H Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Jaap Stoker; Onofre Alarcon; Federico Barbaro; Davide Bellini; Michael Bretthauer; Margriet C De Haan; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Monika Ferlitsch; Steve Halligan; Emma Helbren; Mikael Hellstrom; Ernst J Kuipers; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Emanuele Neri; Lucio Petruzziello; Andrew Plumb; Daniele Regge; Stuart A Taylor; Cesare Hassan; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Davide Bellini; David Burling; Giovanni Cappello; Cristina Carretero; Evelien Dekker; Rami Eliakim; Margriet de Haan; Michal F Kaminski; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Andrea Laghi; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo; Martina Morrin; Deirdre McNamara; Emanuele Neri; Silvia Pecere; Mathieu Pioche; Andrew Plumb; Emanuele Rondonotti; Manon Cw Spaander; Stuart Taylor; Ignacio Fernandez-Urien; Jeanin E van Hooft; Jaap Stoker; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.