Literature DB >> 20179285

Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation.

Nicoline J Breet1, Jochem W van Werkum, Heleen J Bouman, Johannes C Kelder, Henk J T Ruven, Egbert T Bal, Vera H Deneer, Ankie M Harmsze, Jan A S van der Heyden, Benno J W M Rensing, Maarten J Suttorp, Christian M Hackeng, Jurriën M ten Berg.   

Abstract

Context High on-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with atherothrombotic events following coronary stent implantation. Objective To evaluate the capability of multiple platelet function tests to predict clinical outcome. Design, Setting, and Patients Prospective, observational, single-center cohort study of 1069 consecutive patients taking clopidogrel undergoing elective coronary stent implantation between December 2005 and December 2007. On-treatment platelet reactivity was measured in parallel by light transmittance aggregometry, Verify Now P2Y12 and Platelet works assays, and the IMPACT-R and the platelet function analysis system (PFA-100) (with the Dade PFA collagen/adenosine diphosphate (ADP) cartridge and Innovance PFA P2Y). Cutoff values for high on-treatment platelet reactivity were established by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Main Outcome Measurement The primary end point was defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke. The primary safety end point included TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) criteria major and minor bleeding. Results Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that at 1-year follow-up, the primary end point occurred more frequently in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity when assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (52 [11.7%; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 8.9%-15.0%] vs 36 [6.0%;95%CI, 4.2%-8.2%] P.001; n=1049),Verify Now (54 [13.3%; 95% CI, 10.2%-17.0%] vs 37 [5.7%; 95% CI, 4.1%-7.8%]P.001; n=1052), Platelet works (33 [12.6%; 95% CI, 8.8%-17.2%] vs 21 [6.1%;95% CI, 3.8%-9.2%] P=.005; n=606), and Innovance PFA P2Y (18 [12.2%; 95%CI; 7.4%-18.6%] vs 28 [6.3%; 95% CI, 4.3%-8.9%] P=.02; n=588). ROC-curve analysis demonstrated that light transmittance aggregometry (area under the curve[AUC], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.58-0.68), Verify Now (AUC, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.57-0.67), and Platelet works (AUC, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.53-0.69) had modest ability to discriminate between patients with and without primary end point at 1-year follow-up. The IMPACT-R(n=905) and the Siemens PFA Collagen/ADP (n=812) were unable to discriminate between patients with and without the primary end point at 1-year follow-up (all AUCs included 0.50 in the CI). None of the tests identified patients at risk for bleeding. Conclusions Of the platelet function tests assessed, light transmittance aggregometry,Verify Now, Platelet works, and Innovance PFA P2Y were significantly associated with the primary end point. However, the predictive accuracy of these 4 tests was only modest. None of the tests provided accurate prognostic information to identify patients at higher risk of bleeding following stent implantation. Trial Registration clinical trials.gov Identifier: NCT00352014 [corrected].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20179285     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  175 in total

Review 1.  Phenotyping patient-derived cells for translational studies in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Stanley Y Shaw; Ari D Brettman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Anticoagulation in neurointerventions: basic pharmacology and pathophysiology, current status, practical advice.

Authors:  J Scharf; C-E Dempfle
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Pharmacogenetics: Point-of-care genetic testing--a new frontier explored.

Authors:  Paddy M Barrett; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Assessment of platelet inhibition by point-of-care testing in neuroendovascular procedures.

Authors:  H M Hussein; T Emiru; A L Georgiadis; A I Qureshi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Correlation of high post-treatment platelet reactivity assessed by light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay.

Authors:  In-Suk Kim; Young-Hoon Jeong; Min-Kyung Kang; Jin-Sin Koh; Yongwhi Park; Seok-Jae Hwang; Choong Hwan Kwak; Jin-Yong Hwang; Sunjoo Kim
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Immature platelet fraction and high-on treatment platelet reactivity with ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Monica Verdoia; Chiara Sartori; Patrizia Pergolini; Matteo Nardin; Roberta Rolla; Lucia Barbieri; Alon Schaffer; Paolo Marino; Giorgio Bellomo; Harry Suryapranata; Giuseppe De Luca
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Optimal timing of clopidogrel discontinuation in Japanese patients: platelet aggregation test using the VerifyNow® system.

Authors:  Hiroki Takiuchi; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-23

Review 8.  Current status of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with coronary or peripheral arterial disease: Mechanisms, evaluation and clinical implications.

Authors:  Stavros Spiliopoulos; Georgios Pastromas
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-26

Review 9.  High residual platelet reactivity on clopidogrel: its significance and therapeutic challenges overcoming clopidogrel resistance.

Authors:  Torkom Garabedian; Samir Alam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-03

10.  Higher body weight patients on clopidogrel maintenance therapy have lower active metabolite concentrations, lower levels of platelet inhibition, and higher rates of poor responders than low body weight patients.

Authors:  Henrik Wagner; Dominick J Angiolillo; Jurrien M Ten Berg; Thomas O Bergmeijer; Joseph A Jakubowski; David S Small; Brian A Moser; Chunmei Zhou; Patricia Brown; Stefan James; Kenneth J Winters; David Erlinge
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.