Literature DB >> 24043374

Higher body weight patients on clopidogrel maintenance therapy have lower active metabolite concentrations, lower levels of platelet inhibition, and higher rates of poor responders than low body weight patients.

Henrik Wagner1, Dominick J Angiolillo, Jurrien M Ten Berg, Thomas O Bergmeijer, Joseph A Jakubowski, David S Small, Brian A Moser, Chunmei Zhou, Patricia Brown, Stefan James, Kenneth J Winters, David Erlinge.   

Abstract

Body weight is a predictor of clopidogrel response. However, no prospective studies have compared pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) data based on body weight. We compared PD and PK effects of clopidogrel 75 mg in low body weight (LBW, <60 kg) and higher body weight (HBW, ≥60 kg) patients with stable coronary artery disease. LBW (n = 34, 56.4 ± 3.7 kg) and HBW (n = 38, 84.7 ± 14.9 kg) aspirin-treated patients received clopidogrel 75 mg for 10-14 days. The area under the concentration-time curve of active metabolite (Clop-AM) calculated through the last quantifiable concentration up to 4 h postdose, AUC(0-tlast), was calculated by noncompartmental methods. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) (maximum platelet aggregation and inhibition of platelet aggregation to 20 μM adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and residual platelet aggregation to 5 μM ADP), VerifyNow(®) P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), and vasodilator-associated stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation platelet reactivity index (VASP-PRI) were performed. Mean AUC(0-tlast) was lower in HBW than LBW patients: 12.8 versus 17.9 ng h/mL. HBW patients had higher platelet reactivity as measured by LTA (all p ≤ 0.01), PRU (207 ± 68 vs. 152 ± 57, p < 0.001), and VASP-PRI (56 ± 18 vs. 39 ± 17, p < 0.001). More HBW patients exhibited high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) using PRU (35 vs. 9%) and VASP-PRI (65 vs. 27%). Body weight correlated with PRU and VASP-PRI (both p < 0.001), and inversely with log transformed AUC(0-tlast) (p < 0.001). In conclusion, HBW patients had lower levels of Clop-AM, and higher platelet reactivity and rates of HPR than LBW subjects, contributing to their suboptimal response to clopidogrel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24043374     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-013-0987-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  34 in total

1.  Point-of-care measurement of clopidogrel responsiveness predicts clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention results of the ARMYDA-PRO (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity Predicts Outcome) study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Patti; Annunziata Nusca; Fabio Mangiacapra; Laura Gatto; Andrea D'Ambrosio; Germano Di Sciascio
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Pharmacogenomics of clopidogrel: evidence and perspectives.

Authors:  Tong Yin; Toshiyuki Miyata
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Impact of cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism and of major demographic characteristics on residual platelet function after loading and maintenance treatment with clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective coronary stent placement.

Authors:  Willibald Hochholzer; Dietmar Trenk; Martin F Fromm; Christian M Valina; Christian Stratz; Hans-Peter Bestehorn; Heinz Joachim Büttner; Franz-Josef Neumann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Clopidogrel poor responders: an objective definition based on Bayesian classification.

Authors:  Govinda J Weerakkody; John T Brandt; Christopher D Payne; Joseph A Jakubowski; Hideo Naganuma; Kenneth J Winters
Journal:  Platelets       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.862

5.  Relation of low response to clopidogrel assessed with point-of-care assay to periprocedural myonecrosis in patients undergoing elective coronary stenting for stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Thomas Cuisset; Michalis Hamilos; Jaydeep Sarma; Giovanna Sarno; Eric Wyffels; Marc Vanderheyden; Emanuele Barbato; Jozef Bartunek; Bernard De Bruyne; William Wijns
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  The Residual Platelet Aggregation after Deployment of Intracoronary Stent (PREDICT) score.

Authors:  T Geisler; D Grass; B Bigalke; K Stellos; T Drosch; K Dietz; C Herdeg; M Gawaz
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.824

7.  Platelet aggregation according to body mass index in patients undergoing coronary stenting: should clopidogrel loading-dose be weight adjusted?

Authors:  Dominick J Angiolillo; Antonio Fernández-Ortiz; Esther Bernardo; Carlos Barrera Ramírez; Manel Sabaté; Cristina Fernandez; Rosana Hernández-Antolín; Javier Escaned; Fernando Alfonso; Carlos Macaya
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.022

8.  High residual platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading and long-term clinical outcome after drug-eluting stenting for unprotected left main coronary disease.

Authors:  Angela Migliorini; Renato Valenti; Rossella Marcucci; Guido Parodi; Gabriele Giuliani; Piergiovanni Buonamici; Giampaolo Cerisano; Nazario Carrabba; Gian Franco Gensini; Rosanna Abbate; David Antoniucci
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Christopher N Floyd; Gabriella Passacquale; Albert Ferro
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Variability in individual responsiveness to clopidogrel: clinical implications, management, and future perspectives.

Authors:  Dominick J Angiolillo; Antonio Fernandez-Ortiz; Esther Bernardo; Fernando Alfonso; Carlos Macaya; Theodore A Bass; Marco A Costa
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel.

Authors:  Xi-Ling Jiang; Snehal Samant; Lawrence J Lesko; Stephan Schmidt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Safety of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Interventional Neuroradiology: Current Status and Perspectives.

Authors:  L M Camargo; P C T M Lima; K Janot; I L Maldonado
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Aspirin resistance and other aspirin-related concerns.

Authors:  Gaoyu Cai; Weijun Zhou; Ya Lu; Peili Chen; Zhongjiao Lu; Yi Fu
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Development of a physiology-directed population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model for characterizing the impact of genetic and demographic factors on clopidogrel response in healthy adults.

Authors:  Xi-Ling Jiang; Snehal Samant; Joshua P Lewis; Richard B Horenstein; Alan R Shuldiner; Laura M Yerges-Armstrong; Lambertus A Peletier; Lawrence J Lesko; Stephan Schmidt
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.384

5.  Evaluation of Acute In-stent Thrombosis during Stent-assisted Coil Embolization of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Kouhei Nii; Ritsurou Inoue; Yusuke Morinaga; Takafumi Mitsutake; Hayatsura Hanada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 6.  Weight-based dosing in medication use: what should we know?

Authors:  Sheng-Dong Pan; Ling-Ling Zhu; Meng Chen; Ping Xia; Quan Zhou
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.711

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.