PURPOSE: There is a need for new agents to treat metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in patients for whom anthracycline therapy has failed or is contraindicated. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of the novel antineoplastic, the epothilone B analog ixabepilone, in patients with MBC previously treated with an adjuvant anthracycline. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were age >or= 18 years and had received a prior anthracycline-based regimen as adjuvant treatment. Ixabepilone as first-line metastatic chemotherapy was administered as a 40 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion during 3 hours every 3 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary efficacy end points included duration of response, time to response, time to progression, and survival. RESULTS: All 65 patients were assessable for response. Their median age was 52 years (range, 33 to 80 years). ORR was 41.5% (95% CI, 29.4% to 54.4%), median duration of response was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 10.2 months), and median time to response was 6 weeks (range, 5 to 17 weeks). Median survival was 22.0 months (95% CI, 15.6 to 27.0 months). Treatment-related adverse events were manageable and mostly grades 1/2: the most common of these (other than alopecia) was mild to moderate neuropathy, which was primarily sensory and mostly reversible in nature. CONCLUSION: Ixabepilone is efficacious and has a predictable and manageable safety profile in women with MBC previously treated with an adjuvant anthracycline.
PURPOSE: There is a need for new agents to treat metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in patients for whom anthracycline therapy has failed or is contraindicated. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of the novel antineoplastic, the epothilone B analog ixabepilone, in patients with MBC previously treated with an adjuvant anthracycline. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were age >or= 18 years and had received a prior anthracycline-based regimen as adjuvant treatment. Ixabepilone as first-line metastatic chemotherapy was administered as a 40 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion during 3 hours every 3 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary efficacy end points included duration of response, time to response, time to progression, and survival. RESULTS: All 65 patients were assessable for response. Their median age was 52 years (range, 33 to 80 years). ORR was 41.5% (95% CI, 29.4% to 54.4%), median duration of response was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 10.2 months), and median time to response was 6 weeks (range, 5 to 17 weeks). Median survival was 22.0 months (95% CI, 15.6 to 27.0 months). Treatment-related adverse events were manageable and mostly grades 1/2: the most common of these (other than alopecia) was mild to moderate neuropathy, which was primarily sensory and mostly reversible in nature. CONCLUSION:Ixabepilone is efficacious and has a predictable and manageable safety profile in women with MBC previously treated with an adjuvant anthracycline.
Authors: Jason Konner; Rachel N Grisham; Jae Park; Owen A O'Connor; Gillian Cropp; Robert Johnson; Alison L Hannah; Martee L Hensley; Paul Sabbatini; Svetlana Mironov; Svetlana Miranov; Samuel Danishefsky; David Hyman; David R Spriggs; Jakob Dupont; Carol Aghajanian Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Hui Huang; Michael Menefee; Maureen Edgerly; Sen Zhuang; Herb Kotz; Marianne Poruchynsky; Lyn Mickley Huff; Susan Bates; Tito Fojo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Brigitte C Widemann; Wendy Goodspeed; Anne Goodwin; Tito Fojo; Frank M Balis; Elizabeth Fox Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stacy Moulder; Hailun Li; Molin Wang; William J Gradishar; Edith A Perez; Joseph A Sparano; Michael Pins; Ximing Yang; George W Sledge Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Patrick A Ott; Anne Hamilton; Amanda Jones; Naomi Haas; Tsiporah Shore; Sandra Liddell; Paul J Christos; L Austin Doyle; Michael Millward; Franco M Muggia; Anna C Pavlick Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 3.240