Literature DB >> 20178958

Processing of global and selective stop signals: application of Donders' subtraction method to stop-signal task performance.

Maria C van de Laar1, Wery P M van den Wildenberg, Geert J M van Boxtel, Maurits W van der Molen.   

Abstract

This paper applied Donders' subtraction method to examine the processing of global and selective stop signals in the stop-signal paradigm. Participants performed on three different versions of the stop task: a global task and two selective tasks. A global task required participants to inhibit their response to a go signal whenever a stop signal was presented (Stop-a task). A selective stop task required participants to inhibit to one stop signal but not to the other (Stop-c task). Another selective stop task required them to inhibit when the response indicated by go and stop signals was the same but not when they were different (Stop-b task). Stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) was shortest for Stop-a and longest for Stop-b, with intermediate values for the Stop-c task. Additional control experiments that manipulated stop probability confirmed the robustness of global and selective stopping latencies even when the stop-signal probability varied. The current findings contribute to the conclusion that Donders' subtraction method provides a useful tool for estimating the durations of subprocesses that together comprise SSRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20178958     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  10 in total

1.  Having a goal to stop action is associated with advance control of specific motor representations.

Authors:  Michael P Claffey; Sarah Sheldon; Cathy M Stinear; Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Stopping ability in younger and older adults: Behavioral and event-related potential.

Authors:  Shulan Hsieh; Yu-Chi Lin
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Current advances and pressing problems in studies of stopping.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall; David C Godlove
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Selective stopping? Maybe not.

Authors:  Patrick G Bissett; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-03-11

5.  STOP TALKING! Inhibition of Speech is Affected by Word Frequency and Dysfunctional Impulsivity.

Authors:  Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Ingrid K Christoffels
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-09-29

6.  Lifespan changes in global and selective stopping and performance adjustments.

Authors:  Maria C van de Laar; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Geert J M van Boxtel; Maurits W van der Molen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-15

7.  How to stop or change a motor response: Laplacian and independent component analysis approach.

Authors:  Mauricio Rangel-Gomez; Robert T Knight; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Proactive inhibitory control: A general biasing account.

Authors:  Heike Elchlepp; Aureliu Lavric; Christopher D Chambers; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Evidence for capacity sharing when stopping.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-05-28

10.  To Go or Not to Go: Degrees of Dynamic Inhibitory Control Revealed by the Function of Grip Force and Early Electrophysiological Indices.

Authors:  Trung Van Nguyen; Che-Yi Hsu; Satish Jaiswal; Neil G Muggleton; Wei-Kuang Liang; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.