Literature DB >> 20177884

Apomorphine-induced context-specific behavioural sensitization is prevented by the D1 antagonist SCH-23390 but potentiated and uncoupled from contextual cues by the D2 antagonist sulpiride.

Flávia Regina Cruz Dias1, Robert J Carey, Marinete Pinheiro Carrera.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: In the study of behavioural sensitization induced by dopamine agonists, D1 and D2 receptors have a critical, but a puzzling role.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the effects of the D1 antagonist SCH-23390 and the D2 antagonist sulpiride given repeatedly alone or in combination with apomorphine upon apomorphine conditioning and sensitization.
METHODS: Apomorphine-induced (2.0 mg/kg) conditioning and sensitization were assessed following five paired/unpaired treatments. Sulpiride (10, 30 and 100 mg/kg) and SCH-23390 (0.01, 0.02 and 0.05 mg/kg) were administered alone or in combination with apomorphine. In experiment 1, the effect of 5 days of sulpiride and SCH-23390 treatments given alone were assessed on apomorphine reactivity. In experiment 2, sulpiride and SCH-23390 were co-administered with apomorphine for 5 days and subsequently, conditioning and sensitization tests were performed. In experiment 3, following five apomorphine treatment sessions, sulpiride and SCH-23390 were administered prior to the conditioning and sensitization tests.
RESULTS: SCH-23390 and sulpiride induced hyper-reactivity to apomorphine. SCH-23390 when given after the induction of apomorphine sensitization, blocked the expression of apomorphine sensitization. When given in combination with apomorphine, SCH-23390 blocked the apomorphine conditioning and sensitization, whereas low-dose sulpiride permitted conditioning and enhanced apomorphine sensitization and high-dose sulpiride blocked conditioning but permitted apomorphine sensitization. Both sulpiride doses transformed apomorphine sensitization from context-specific to context-independent sensitization.
CONCLUSION: The SCH-23390 findings are supportive of a critical role for D1 receptors in apomorphine effects whereas the sulpiride effects diminish the importance of conditioning and dopamine autoreceptor subsensitivity mechanisms in the mediation of apomorphine sensitization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20177884     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-009-1768-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  36 in total

1.  Conditioning, habituation and behavioral reorganization factors in chronic cocaine effects.

Authors:  E N Damianopoulos; R J Carey
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1992-08-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Behavioral sensitization to apomorphine in pigeons (Columba livia): blockade by the D1 dopamine antagonist SCH-23390.

Authors:  Martin J Acerbo; Juan D Delius
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Conditioned locomotion induced by unilateral intrastriatal administration of apomorphine: D(2) receptor activation is critical but not the expression of the unconditioned response.

Authors:  Flávia Regina Cruz Dias; Robert J Carey; Marinete Pinheiro Carrera
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Low dose apomorphine induces context-specific sensitization of hypolocomotion without conditioning: support for a new state dependent retrieval hypothesis of drug conditioning and sensitization.

Authors:  Priscila Quintanilha Braga; Flávia Regina Cruz Dias; Robert J Carey; Marinete Pinheiro Carrera
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Latent sensitization to apomorphine following repeated low doses.

Authors:  B A Mattingly; J E Gotsick; K Salamanca
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  The effect of dopamine receptor blockade on the development of sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of amphetamine and morphine.

Authors:  P Vezina; J Stewart
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1989-10-09       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Effects of selective dopamine D1- and D2-type receptor antagonists on the development of behavioral sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT.

Authors:  B A Mattingly; C Himmler; T Bonta; L L Rice
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Effects of apomorphine and amphetamine on patterns of locomotor and investigatory behavior in rats.

Authors:  M A Geyer; P V Russo; D S Segal; R Kuczenski
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Effects of daily SKF 38393, quinpirole, and SCH 23390 treatments on locomotor activity and subsequent sensitivity to apomorphine.

Authors:  B A Mattingly; J K Rowlett; G Lovell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Chronic autoreceptor blockade and neuroleptic-induced dopamine receptor hypersensitivity.

Authors:  J H Gordon; J K Clopton; J C Curtin; W C Koller
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  5 in total

1.  Memory re-consolidation and drug conditioning: an apomorphine conditioned locomotor stimulant response can be enhanced or reversed by a single high versus low apomorphine post-trial treatment.

Authors:  Marinete Pinheiro Carrera; Robert J Carey; Flávia Regina Cruz Dias; Liana Wermelinger de Mattos
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Residual dopamine receptor desensitization following either high- or low-dose sub-chronic prior exposure to the atypical anti-psychotic drug olanzapine.

Authors:  Flávia Regina Cruz Dias; Liana Wermelinger de Matos; Maria de Fátima Dos Santos Sampaio; Robert J Carey; Marinete Pinheiro Carrera
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Role of the D1 receptor for the dopamine agonist-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization of preweanling rats.

Authors:  Alena Mohd-Yusof; Ashley E Gonzalez; Ana Veliz; Sanders A McDougall
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Opposite effects of typical and atypical anti-psychotic drugs on sensitized dopamine receptors: sub-chronic low dose Olanzapine exposure reverses sensitization but a similar regimen of low dose haloperidol potentiates sensitization effects.

Authors:  Flávia Regina Cruz Dias; João Marcos de Mello Bastos; Maria de Fátima Dos Santos Sampaio; Robert J Carey; Marinete Pinheiro Carrera
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Conditioned increase of locomotor activity induced by haloperidol.

Authors:  Luis Gonzalo De la Casa; Lucía Cárcel; Juan Carlos Ruiz-Salas; Lucía Vicente; Auxiliadora Mena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.