Literature DB >> 21922172

Memory re-consolidation and drug conditioning: an apomorphine conditioned locomotor stimulant response can be enhanced or reversed by a single high versus low apomorphine post-trial treatment.

Marinete Pinheiro Carrera1, Robert J Carey, Flávia Regina Cruz Dias, Liana Wermelinger de Mattos.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Psychostimulant sensitization can have transformative effects upon contextual stimuli such as acquired conditioned stimuli and conditioned incentive motivational properties.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to induce apomorphine sensitization and conduct non-drug exposures to the contextual cues followed by post-trial treatments designed to associate increases/decreases in dopamine activity with re-consolidation of the contextual cue conditioned stimulus.
METHODS: Separate groups received five daily apomorphine (2.0 mg/kg) treatments, paired or unpaired to the test environment. Two days later, a 30-min non-drug conditioning test was performed. Subsequently, there were three brief (5 min) conditioning tests on successive days. After removal from the test environment on the three test days, all groups received post-trial treatment with vehicle, 0.05, and 2.0 mg/kg apomorphine. One day later, a second 30-min conditioning test was conducted.
RESULTS: There was a sensitized and a conditioned locomotor stimulant response in the paired groups. After the first and second post-trial treatments with 0.05 mg/kg apomorphine, the conditioned stimulant response in the paired group was transformed into a conditioned inhibitory response. In contrast, the conditioned stimulant response of the paired group administered with apomorphine 2.0 mg/kg post-trial was amplified. The apomorphine post-trial treatments administered to the unpaired groups or 2 h post-trial to paired groups were without effect.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that sensitization substantially enhances the associative sensitivity of contextual stimuli and imply that brief exposure to cues linked to drugs of addiction followed by treatments that inhibit neurotransmitter systems may provide a new direction in drug abuse treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21922172     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2474-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  50 in total

Review 1.  Incentive-sensitization and addiction.

Authors:  T E Robinson; K C Berridge
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Temporally graded requirement for protein synthesis following memory reactivation.

Authors:  Maria H Milekic; Cristina M Alberini
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Cellular and systems reconsolidation in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Jacek Debiec; Joseph E LeDoux; Karim Nader
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Behavioral evidence for the significance of serotoninergic (5-HT) receptors in cocaine addiction.

Authors:  Małgorzata Filip; Natalia Alenina; Michael Bader; Edmund Przegaliński
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  Low dose apomorphine induces context-specific sensitization of hypolocomotion without conditioning: support for a new state dependent retrieval hypothesis of drug conditioning and sensitization.

Authors:  Priscila Quintanilha Braga; Flávia Regina Cruz Dias; Robert J Carey; Marinete Pinheiro Carrera
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Cocaine conditioning and cocaine sensitization: what is the relationship?

Authors:  R J Carey; J Gui
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Reciprocal responsiveness of nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine to food- and drug-conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Valentina Bassareo; Paolo Musio; Gaetano Di Chiara
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Cocaine conditioning and sensitization: the habituation factor.

Authors:  Robert J Carey; Ernest N Damianopoulos
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 9.  Glucose improvement of memory: a review.

Authors:  Claude Messier
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 10.  Developing treatments that address classical conditioning.

Authors:  C P O'Brien; A R Childress; A T McLellan; R Ehrman
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1993
View more
  3 in total

1.  Opposite effects of typical and atypical anti-psychotic drugs on sensitized dopamine receptors: sub-chronic low dose Olanzapine exposure reverses sensitization but a similar regimen of low dose haloperidol potentiates sensitization effects.

Authors:  Flávia Regina Cruz Dias; João Marcos de Mello Bastos; Maria de Fátima Dos Santos Sampaio; Robert J Carey; Marinete Pinheiro Carrera
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Assessing the translational feasibility of pharmacological drug memory reconsolidation blockade with memantine in quitting smokers.

Authors:  Ravi K Das; Chandni Hindocha; Tom P Freeman; Antonio I Lazzarino; H Valerie Curran; Sunjeev K Kamboj
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Conditioned increase of locomotor activity induced by haloperidol.

Authors:  Luis Gonzalo De la Casa; Lucía Cárcel; Juan Carlos Ruiz-Salas; Lucía Vicente; Auxiliadora Mena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.