Literature DB >> 20175282

Do radial arterial pressure curves have diagnostic validity for identify severe aortic stenosis?

Naoki Yoshioka1, Yoshihisa Fujita, Takeshi Yasukawa, Itsuro Sano, Masako Kiso, Masayuki Nakayama, Yuka Yoshida.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A pulsus parvus et tardus of the carotid artery, i.e., a small weak pulse with a delayed systolic peak, is a well-recognized clinical finding of aortic stenosis (AS). However, the diagnostic value of radial arterial pressure curves has not been specifically investigated. In this study, we investigated whether the radial arterial curves of patients with AS had distinguishable characteristics.
METHODS: We studied 17 AS patients (valve area less than 0.8 cm2) and 17 control patients. The durations for the following intervals were measured, from the ECG-R to the beginning of the arterial pressure wave upstroke (PTT(Up)), from the ECG-R to the peak of the arterial pressure (PTT(peak)), and the difference between PTT(peak) and PTT(Up) (T(Upstroke)).
RESULTS: The radial arterial pulse pressures did not differ significantly, indicating absence of a pulsus paruvus in the radial pressure of the AS patients. The PTT(Up) and PTT(peak) in the AS patients were 134 +/- 18 and 337 +/- 44 ms, respectively, while these values in the control patients were 143 +/- 21 and 286 +/- 64 ms. As a result of the differences in PTT(Up) and PTT(peak), the T(Upstroke) in the AS patients was greater than that in the control patients. The T(Upstroke) cutoff point that gave the maximal sensitivity (0.93) and specificity (0.65) was 156 ms.
CONCLUSION: Our study using the radial arterial curve validated a pulsus tardus as a diagnostic sign for severe AS, while the validity of a pulsus parvus as a diagnostic sign was not confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20175282     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-009-0837-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

Review 1.  Congenital heart disease in adults. First of two parts.

Authors:  M E Brickner; L D Hillis; R A Lange
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Blase A Carabello
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  The patient with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  George Istaphanous
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2005

4.  Central venous pulse pressure analysis using an R-synchronized pressure measurement system.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Fujita; Daisuke Hayashi; Shinya Wada; Naoki Yoshioka; Takeshi Yasukawa; Gunther Pestel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Assessment of arterial distensibility by automatic pulse wave velocity measurement. Validation and clinical application studies.

Authors:  R Asmar; A Benetos; J Topouchian; P Laurent; B Pannier; A M Brisac; R Target; B I Levy
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Usefulness of clinical assessment of the carotid pulse in the diagnosis of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Joseph Selvanayagam; Carmine De Pasquale; Leonard Arnolda
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Aortic stenosis: an underestimated risk factor for perioperative complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Miklos D Kertai; Manolis Bountioukos; Eric Boersma; Jeroen J Bax; Ian R Thomson; Fabiola Sozzi; Jan Klein; Jos R T C Roelandt; Don Poldermans
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  [Aortic valve stenosis in the old age: clinical and echocardiographic aspects].

Authors:  R Christen; H Saner; M Romanens; M Pirovino
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1994-02-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.