Literature DB >> 2017353

The reduction of saccadic latency by prior offset of the fixation point: an analysis of the gap effect.

P A Reuter-Lorenz1, H C Hughes, R Fendrich.   

Abstract

The latency to initiate a saccade (saccadic reaction time) to an eccentric target is reduced by extinguishing the fixation stimulus prior to the target onset. Various accounts have attributed this latency reduction (referred to as the gap effect) to facilitated sensory processing, oculomotor readiness, or attentional processes. Two experiments were performed to explore the relative contributions of these factors to the gap effect. Experiment 1 demonstrates that the reduction in saccadic reaction time (RT) produced by fixation point offset is additive with the effect of target luminance. Experiment 2 indicates that the gap effect is specific for saccades directed toward a peripheral target and does not influence saccades directed away from the target (i.e., antisaccades) or choice-manual RT. The results are consistent with an interpretation of the gap effect in terms of facilitated premotor processing in the superior colliculus.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2017353     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  33 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus intensity and response evocation.

Authors:  G R Grice
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B Fischer; B Breitmeyer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The effect of attentive fixation on eye movements evoked by electrical stimulation of the frontal eye fields.

Authors:  M E Goldberg; M C Bushnell; C J Bruce
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection.

Authors:  H L Hawkins; M G Shafto; K Richardson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-11

5.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  The prefrontal cortico-oculomotor trajectories in the monkey.

Authors:  G R Leichnetz
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.181

7.  Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement.

Authors:  M G Saslow
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1967-08

8.  Cortical projections to the paramedian tegmental and basilar pons in the monkey.

Authors:  G R Leichnetz; D J Smith; R F Spencer
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-09-20       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P H Schiller; J H Sandell; J H Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Deficits in eye movements following frontal eye-field and superior colliculus ablations.

Authors:  P H Schiller; S D True; J L Conway
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  83 in total

1.  Saccadic latency during perceptual processing and sequence learning.

Authors:  J G May; M L Berg; L A Zebley
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Target similarity affects saccade curvature away from irrelevant onsets.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Oculomotor readiness and covert orienting: differences between central and peripheral precues.

Authors:  P A Reuter-Lorenz; R Fendrich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-09

4.  Gap effects on saccade and vergence latency.

Authors:  Olivier Coubard; Gintautas Daunys; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Saccades to targets in three-dimensional space: dependence of saccadic latency on target location.

Authors:  H Honda; J M Findlay
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

6.  Effect of stimulus probability on anti-saccade error rates.

Authors:  Michael J Koval; Kristen A Ford; Stefan Everling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dissociated effects of distractors on saccades and manual aiming.

Authors:  Robert D McIntosh; Antimo Buonocore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal the availability of reward.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Tom Nissens; Daniel Pearson; Mike Le Pelley; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  The tell-tale tasks: a review of saccadic research in psychiatric patient populations.

Authors:  Diane C Gooding; Michele A Basso
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Faces distort eye movement trajectories, but the distortion is not stronger for your own face.

Authors:  Haoyue Qian; Xiangping Gao; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.