Literature DB >> 20173195

Enactment and retrieval.

Daniel J Peterson1, Neil W Mulligan.   

Abstract

The enactment effect is one of a number of effects (e.g., bizarreness, generation, perceptual interference) that have been treated in common theoretical frameworks, most of them focusing on encoding processes. Recent results from McDaniel, Dornburg, and Guynn (2005) call into question whether bizarreness and, by association, related phenomena such as enactment are better conceptualized as arising due to retrieval processes. Four experiments investigated the degree to which retrieval processes are responsible for enhanced memory for enacted phrases. Participants were presented with two pure study lists and later recalled the lists separately (inducing pure retrieval sets) or recalled the lists together in a single test (inducing a combined or mixed retrieval set). Across all four experiments, the combined recall condition consistently failed to enhance the size of the enactment effect. The results provide no support for the retrieval account but are generally consistent with encoding accounts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20173195     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.2.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  Memory for actions: item and relational information in categorized lists.

Authors:  Johannes Engelkamp; Kerstin H Seiler; Hubert D Zimmer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-23

2.  Memory organization of action events and its relationship to memory performance.

Authors:  Asher Koriat; Shiri Pearlman-Avnion
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-09

3.  Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Courtney C Dornburg; Melissa J Guynn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

4.  Hypermnesia and total retrieval time.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-05

5.  Order information and free recall: evaluating the item-order hypothesis.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Jeffrey P Lozito
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention.

Authors:  J S Nairne; G L Riegler; M Serra
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Limits on the role of retrieval cues in memory for actions: enactment effects in the absence of object cues in the environment.

Authors:  Melanie C Steffens; Axel Buchner; Karl F Wender; Claudia Decker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

8.  Assessing a retrieval account of the generation and perceptual-interference effects.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Daniel Peterson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-12

9.  Memory for actions: self-performed tasks and the reenactment effect.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Susan L Hornstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

10.  Motor programme information as a separable memory unit.

Authors:  J Engelkamp; H D Zimmer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1984
View more
  3 in total

1.  The bizarreness effect: evidence for the critical influence of retrieval processes.

Authors:  Lisa Geraci; Mark A McDaniel; Tyler M Miller; Matthew L Hughes
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

2.  The Influence of Poststudy Action Congruency on Memory Consolidation.

Authors:  René Zeelenberg; Sebastiaan Remmers; Florence Blaauwgeers; Diane Pecher
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2020-07

Review 3.  Teaching the science of learning.

Authors:  Yana Weinstein; Christopher R Madan; Megan A Sumeracki
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-01-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.