Literature DB >> 20172711

Marked improvements in survival of patients with rectal cancer in the Netherlands following changes in therapy, 1989-2006.

M A G Elferink1, L N van Steenbergen, P Krijnen, V E P P Lemmens, H J Rutten, C A M Marijnen, I D Nagtegaal, H E Karim-Kos, E de Vries, S Siesling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the 1990s, treatment of patients with rectal cancer has changed in the Netherlands. Aim of this study was to describe these changes in treatment over time and to evaluate their effects on survival.
METHODS: All patients in the Netherlands Cancer Registry with invasive primary rectal cancer diagnosed during the period 1989-2006 were selected. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to analyse trends in treatment over time. Multivariate relative survival analyses were performed to estimate relative excess risk (RER) of dying.
RESULTS: In total, 40,888 patients were diagnosed with rectal cancer during the period 1989-2006. The proportion of patients with stages II and III disease receiving preoperative radiotherapy increased from 1% in the period 1989-1992 to 68% in the period 2004-2006 for younger patients (<75 years) and from 1% to 51% for older patients (>or=75 years), whereas the use of postoperative radiotherapy decreased. Administration of chemotherapy to patients with stage IV disease increased over time from 21% to 66% for patients younger than 75 years. Both males and females exhibited an increase in five-year relative survival from 53% to 60%. The highest increase in survival was found for patients with stage III disease. In the multivariate analyses survival improved over time for patients with stages II-IV disease. After adjustment for treatment variables, this improvement remained significant for patients with stages III and IV disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The changes in therapy for rectal cancer have led to a markedly increased survival. Patients with stage III disease experienced the greatest improvement in survival. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20172711     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  23 in total

Review 1.  Has the new TNM classification for colorectal cancer improved care?

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Phil Quirke; Hans-Joachim Schmoll
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Treatment strategies for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: surgical and oncological outcomes with propensity-score analysis.

Authors:  H Salvador-Rosés; S López-Ben; P Planellas; E Canals; M Casellas-Robert; R Farrés; E Ramos; A Codina-Cazador; J Figueras
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Improved survival for older patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer between 2008 and 2011.

Authors:  M E Hamaker; A H Schiphorst; N M Verweij; A Pronk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Quality of surgical care, local recurrence, and survival in patients with low- and midrectal cancers following multimodal therapy.

Authors:  Ilmo Kellokumpu; Jaana Vironen; Matti Kairaluoma; Ismo Jantunen; Hannu Kautiainen; Kyösti Nuorva
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Nationwide trends in incidence, treatment and survival of colorectal cancer patients with synchronous metastases.

Authors:  Lydia G M van der Geest; Jorine't Lam-Boer; Miriam Koopman; Cees Verhoef; Marloes A G Elferink; Johannes H W de Wilt
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 6.  Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and its association with quality of life: a systematic review.

Authors:  Floortje Mols; Tonneke Beijers; Gerard Vreugdenhil; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Quantifying fatigue in (long-term) colorectal cancer survivors: a study from the population-based patient reported outcomes following initial treatment and long term evaluation of survivorship registry.

Authors:  Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Xin S Wang; Valery E P P Lemmens; Tineke J Smilde; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 8.  Advances in the care of patients with mucinous colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Niek Hugen; Gina Brown; Robert Glynne-Jones; Johannes H W de Wilt; Iris D Nagtegaal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients.

Authors:  Riccardo A Audisio; Demetris Papamichael
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 10.  Patterns of colorectal cancer care in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand.

Authors:  Neetu Chawla; Eboneé N Butler; Jennifer Lund; Joan L Warren; Linda C Harlan; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.