PURPOSE: The incidence of painful bone metastases increases with longer survival times. Although external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is an effective palliative treatment, it often requires several days from the start of treatment to produce a measurable reduction in pain scores and a qualitative amelioration of patient pain levels. Meanwhile, the use of analgesics remains the best approach early on in the treatment course. We investigated the role of radiation therapists as key personnel for collecting daily pain scores to supplement assessments by physician and oncology nursing staff and manage pain more effectively during radiation treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Daily pain scores were obtained by the radiation therapists for 89 patients undertaking a total of 124 courses of EBRT for bone metastases and compared with pretreatment pain scores. The majority of patients (71%) were treated to 30 Gy (range, 20-37.5) in 10 fractions (range, 8-15 fractions). RESULTS: One hundred nineteen treatment courses (96%) were completed. Pain scores declined rapidly to 37.5%, 50%, and 75% of the pretreatment levels by Days 2, 4, and 10, respectively. Pain was improved in 91% of patients with only 4% of worse pain at the end of treatment. Improved pain scores were maintained in 83% of patients at 1-month follow-up, but in 35% of them, the pain was worse than at the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Collection of daily pain scores by radiation therapists was associated with an effective reduction in pain scores early on during EBRT of painful osseous metastases.
PURPOSE: The incidence of painful bone metastases increases with longer survival times. Although external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is an effective palliative treatment, it often requires several days from the start of treatment to produce a measurable reduction in pain scores and a qualitative amelioration of patientpain levels. Meanwhile, the use of analgesics remains the best approach early on in the treatment course. We investigated the role of radiation therapists as key personnel for collecting daily pain scores to supplement assessments by physician and oncology nursing staff and manage pain more effectively during radiation treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Daily pain scores were obtained by the radiation therapists for 89 patients undertaking a total of 124 courses of EBRT for bone metastases and compared with pretreatment pain scores. The majority of patients (71%) were treated to 30 Gy (range, 20-37.5) in 10 fractions (range, 8-15 fractions). RESULTS: One hundred nineteen treatment courses (96%) were completed. Pain scores declined rapidly to 37.5%, 50%, and 75% of the pretreatment levels by Days 2, 4, and 10, respectively. Pain was improved in 91% of patients with only 4% of worse pain at the end of treatment. Improved pain scores were maintained in 83% of patients at 1-month follow-up, but in 35% of them, the pain was worse than at the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Collection of daily pain scores by radiation therapists was associated with an effective reduction in pain scores early on during EBRT of painful osseous metastases.
Authors: C Benedetti; C Brock; C Cleeland; N Coyle; J E Dubé; B Ferrell; S Hassenbusch; N A Janjan; M J Lema; M H Levy; M J Loscalzo; M Lynch; C Muir; L Oakes; A O'Neill; R Payne; K L Syrjala; S Urba; S M Weinstein Journal: Oncology (Williston Park) Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 2.990
Authors: C S Cleeland; R Gonin; A K Hatfield; J H Edmonson; R H Blum; J A Stewart; K J Pandya Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-03-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Charles B Simone; Neha Vapiwala; Margaret K Hampshire; James M Metz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nicolas Magné; Cyrus Chargari; René Olivier Mirimanoff; Pierre Olivier; Jean Philippe Vuillez; Michèle Tubiana-Hulin; Jean Jacques Body; Jean Léon Lagrange Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-08-31 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Luigi Zugaro; Mario DI Staso; Giovanni Luca Gravina; Pierluigi Bonfili; Lorenzo Gregori; Pietro Franzese; Francesco Marampon; Vincenzo Tombolini; Ernesto DI Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Mario Di Staso; Giovanni Luca Gravina; Luigi Zugaro; Pierluigi Bonfili; Lorenzo Gregori; Pietro Franzese; Francesco Marampon; Francesca Vittorini; Roberto Moro; Vincenzo Tombolini; Ernesto Di Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240