Literature DB >> 20171750

IMRT-based optimization approaches for volumetric modulated single arc radiotherapy planning.

Wouter Crijns1, Tom Budiharto, Gilles Defraene, Jan Verstraete, Tom Depuydt, Karin Haustermans, Frank Van den Heuvel.   

Abstract

This paper reports on an evaluation of 5 RapidArc optimization approaches vs IMRT. This study includes 11 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Rectal Normal Tissue Complication Probability is used as a constraint in a dose escalation. RapidArc rectal NTCP's are lower than those of IMRT (p = 0.007). This allows a mean dose escalation of 2.1 Gy([0.7 Gy,3.5 Gy]). Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20171750     DOI： 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN： 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  7 in total

Review 1.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice.

Authors:  M Teoh; C H Clark; K Wood; S Whitaker; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Dosimetry Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Rapid Arcand Fixed Field Dynamic IMRT for Local-Regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bao-Min Zheng; Xiao-Xia Dong; Hao Wu; Shu-Kui Han; Yan Sun
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Searching standard parameters for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marius Treutwein; Matthias Hipp; Oliver Koelbl; Barbara Dobler
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Impact of MLC leaf width on volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning for head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Caroline Lafond; Enrique Chajon; Anne Devillers; Guillaume Louvel; Sandra Toublanc; Mickael Olivier; Antoine Simon; Renaud De Crevoisier; Jean-Pierre Manens
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  RapidArc, SmartArc and TomoHD compared with classical step and shoot and sliding window intensity modulated radiotherapy in an oropharyngeal cancer treatment plan comparison.

Authors:  Dirk Van Gestel; Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij; Frank Van den Heuvel; Wouter Crijns; Ann Coelmont; Bie De Ost; Andrea Holt; Emmy Lamers; Yasmyne Geussens; Sandra Nuyts; Danielle Van den Weyngaert; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Jan B Vermorken; Vincent Gregoire
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Fast Helical Tomotherapy in a head and neck cancer planning study: is time priceless?

Authors:  Dirk Van Gestel; Geert De Kerf; Kristien Wouters; Wouter Crijns; Jan B Vermorken; Vincent Gregoire; Dirk Verellen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for prostate cancer with flattened beam and flattening filter free linear accelerators.

Authors:  Marius Treutwein; Matthias Hipp; Oliver Koelbl; Barbara Dobler
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.102
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.