Literature DB >> 20171666

Segmental ureterectomy can safely be performed in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the ureter.

Claudio Jeldres1, Giovanni Lughezzani, Maxine Sun, Hendrik Isbarn, Shahrokh F Shariat, Lars Budaus, Jean-Baptiste Lattouf, Hugues Widmer, Markus Graefen, Francesco Montorsi, Paul Perrotte, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To date no study to our knowledge has compared cancer control outcomes of segmental ureterectomy relative to nephroureterectomy, which represents the standard of care for ureteral transitional cell carcinoma. We compared cancer specific mortality rates according to surgery type (nephroureterectomy vs segmental ureterectomy) in a large population based cohort of patients with ureteral transitional cell carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our analyses involved 2,044 patients with pathological T1-T4 N0M0 ureteral transitional cell carcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Survival plots and Cox regression models compared cancer specific mortality after segmental ureterectomy, or nephroureterectomy with or without bladder cuff removal. Covariates consisted of pathological stage and grade, age, race, gender and year of surgery.
RESULTS: Median followup of censored patients was 30.0 months. Overall 569 (27.8%) patients underwent segmental ureterectomy vs 1,222 (59.8%) nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff removal and 253 (12.4%) nephroureterectomy without bladder cuff removal. At 5 years cancer specific mortality-free rates for segmental ureterectomy vs nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff removal vs nephroureterectomy without bladder cuff removal were 86.6% vs 82.2% vs 80.5%, respectively (all pairwise log rank comparisons p >or=0.05). On univariable and multivariable analyses of the entire cohort, as well as after stratification according to pT1-2 vs pT3-4 stage, the type of surgery (segmental ureterectomy vs nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff removal vs nephroureterectomy without bladder cuff removal) failed to affect cancer specific mortality rates (p >or=0.2).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ureteral transitional cell carcinoma segmental ureterectomy does not undermine cancer control outcomes relative to nephroureterectomy (with or without bladder cuff removal). Therefore, segmental ureterectomy may be offered to virtually all patients with ureteral transitional cell carcinoma when it is technically feasible, which also includes carefully selected patients with T3 or even T4 lesions. Copyright (c) 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20171666     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

1.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

2.  Transitional cell carcinoma arising in a calyceal cyst mimicking a cystic renal tumour.

Authors:  Jeong Ho Kim; Joo Yeon Song; Wan Lee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Nephron-sparing Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Francesca Suriano; Tommaso Brancato
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

4.  Segmental ureterectomy is not inferior to radical nephroureterectomy for either middle or distal ureter urothelial cell carcinomas within 3.5 cm.

Authors:  Chen Fang; Xin Xie; Tianyuan Xu; Wei He; Hongchao He; Xiaojing Wang; Yu Zhu; Zhoujun Shen; Yuan Shao
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  A patient with synchronous bilateral low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent nephroureterectomy and total ureterectomy with ileal ureteric replacement.

Authors:  Yoshinori Matsuda; Takamitsu Inoue; Atsushi Maeno; Atsushi Koizumi; Ryohei Yamamoto; Taketoshi Nara; Sohei Kanda; Kazuyuki Numakura; Mitsuru Saito; Shintaro Narita; Shigeru Satoh; Tomonori Habuchi
Journal:  Int Cancer Conf J       Date:  2020-03-03

6.  Nephron-sparing management vs radical nephroureterectomy for low- or moderate-grade, low-stage upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jay Simhan; Marc C Smaldone; Brian L Egleston; Daniel Canter; Steven N Sterious; Anthony T Corcoran; Serge Ginzburg; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Conservative treatment of upper urinary tract carcinoma: Long-term results.

Authors:  Andrea Orosa Andrada; Inés Laso García; Fernando Arias Fúnez; Francisco Donis Canet; Gemma Duque Ruiz; Victoria Gómez Dos Santos; Francisco Javier Burgos Revilla
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Results and outcomes after endoscopic treatment of upper urinary tract carcinoma: the Austrian experience.

Authors:  Harun Fajkovic; Tobias Klatte; Udo Nagele; Michael Dunzinger; Richard Zigeuner; Wilhelm Hübner; Mesut Remzi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Conservative nephron-sparing treatment of upper-tract tumors.

Authors:  Paul Smith; Juliette Mandel; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and renal function outcomes obtained after segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  D Fang; T Seisen; K Yang; P Liu; X Fan; N Singla; G Xiong; L Zhang; X Li; L Zhou
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.424

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.