Literature DB >> 20171625

Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of chromosomal imbalances on embryos: the evolution of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal translocations.

Francesco Fiorentino1, Georgia Kokkali, Anil Biricik, Dimitri Stavrou, Bahar Ismailoglu, Rosangela De Palma, Lucia Arizzi, Gary Harton, Mariateresa Sessa, Kostantinos Pantos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) approach for detection of chromosomal imbalances in embryos.
DESIGN: A prospective study of embryos derived from chromosome translocation carriers that have undergone PGD using a novel molecular-based approach.
SETTING: A reference molecular genetics laboratory specialized in the provision of transport PGD services and a private IVF clinic. PATIENT(S): Twenty-seven couples carrying 12 different reciprocal translocations and 2 Robertsonian translocations. INTERVENTION(S): Preimplantation genetic diagnosis from chromosome translocation carriers on blastomeres biopsied from cleavage stage embryos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Embryo diagnosis rate, pregnancy rate (PR), implantation rate, take-home-baby rate. RESULT(S): Overall, 241/251 (96.0%) embryos were successfully diagnosed for chromosome rearrangements. Preimplantation genetic screening was included in the protocol of 12 couples, involving analysis of 90 embryos, 84 (93.3%) of which were successfully diagnosed and 53 (63.1%) showed aneuploidies. Embryos suitable for transfer were identified in 24 cycles. Eighteen couples achieved a clinical pregnancy (75.0% PR/embryo transfer), with a total of 31 embryos implanted (59.6% implantation rate). Ten patients (1 triplet, 1 twin, and 8 singleton pregnancies) have delivered 13 healthy babies, and the other patients (3 twins and 5 singletons) have currently ongoing pregnancies. CONCLUSION(S): The PCR-based PGD protocol for translocations has the potential to overcome several inherent limitations of fluorescence in situ hybridization-based tests, providing potential improvements in terms of test performance, automation, turnaround time, sensitivity, and reliability.
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20171625     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  17 in total

1.  Singling out genetic disorders and disease.

Authors:  Martine De Rycke
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  SNP array-based copy number and genotype analyses for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human unbalanced translocations.

Authors:  Chris M J van Uum; Servi J C Stevens; Joseph C F M Dreesen; Marion Drüsedau; Hubert J Smeets; Bertien Hollanders-Crombach; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Joep P M Geraedts; John J M Engelen; Edith Coonen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Benefits and drawbacks of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for reciprocal translocations: lessons from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul N Scriven; Frances A Flinter; Yakoub Khalaf; Alison Lashwood; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Authors:  Lina Lu; Bo Lv; Kevin Huang; Zhigang Xue; Xianmin Zhu; Guoping Fan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Interchromosomal effect in carriers of translocations and inversions assessed by preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR).

Authors:  E Mateu-Brull; L Rodrigo; V Peinado; A Mercader; I Campos-Galindo; F Bronet; S García-Herrero; M Florensa; M Milán; C Rubio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  An update of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in gene diseases, chromosomal translocation, and aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Li-Jung Chang; Shee-Uan Chen; Yi-Yi Tsai; Chia-Cheng Hung; Mei-Ya Fang; Yi-Ning Su; Yu-Shih Yang
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2011-09-30

7.  Karyomapping-a comprehensive means of simultaneous monogenic and cytogenetic PGD: comparison with standard approaches in real time for Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Alan R Thornhill; Alan H Handyside; Christian Ottolini; Senthil A Natesan; Jon Taylor; Karen Sage; Gary Harton; Kerry Cliffe; Nabeel Affara; Michalis Konstantinidis; Dagan Wells; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Application of next-generation sequencing for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Hua Jin; Lian Liu; Jianqiao Liu; Wei-Hua Wang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Letter to the editor by megan Hall.

Authors:  Jennifer Saucier; Katrina Merrion; Janine Mash; Barbara Pettersen; Megan Hall; Zachary Demko
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  Chromosome-specific DNA repeats: rapid identification in silico and validation using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Joanne H Hsu; Hui Zeng; Kalistyn H Lemke; Aris A Polyzos; Jingly F Weier; Mei Wang; Anna R Lawin-O'Brien; Heinz-Ulrich G Weier; Benjamin O'Brien
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.