Literature DB >> 20170806

The ROSE (risk stratification of syncope in the emergency department) study.

Matthew J Reed1, David E Newby, Andrew J Coull, Robin J Prescott, Keith G Jacques, Alasdair J Gray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a clinical decision rule (CDR) to predict 1-month serious outcome and all-cause death in patients presenting with syncope to the emergency department.
BACKGROUND: Syncope is a common, potentially serious condition accounting for many hospital admissions.
METHODS: This was a single center, prospective, observational study of adults presenting to the emergency department with syncope. A CDR was devised from 550 patients in a derivation cohort and tested in a validation cohort of a further 550 patients.
RESULTS: One-month serious outcome or all-cause death occurred in 40 (7.3%) patients in the derivation cohort. Independent predictors were brain natriuretic peptide concentration > or =300 pg/ml (odds ratio [OR]: 7.3), positive fecal occult blood (OR: 13.2), hemoglobin < or =90 g/l (OR: 6.7), oxygen saturation < or =94% (OR: 3.0), and Q-wave on the presenting electrocardiogram (OR: 2.8). One-month serious outcome or all-cause death occurred in 39 (7.1%) patients in the validation cohort. The ROSE (Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department) rule had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.2% and 65.5%, respectively, and a negative predictive value of 98.5%. An elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration alone was a major predictor of serious cardiovascular outcomes (8 of 22 events, 36%) and all-cause deaths (8 of 9 deaths, 89%).
CONCLUSIONS: The ROSE rule has excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value in the identification of high-risk patients with syncope. As a component, BNP seems to be a major predictor of serious cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause death. The ROSE rule and BNP measurement might be valuable risk stratification tools in patients with emergency presentations of syncope and should now be subjected to external validation. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20170806     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  50 in total

1.  Syncope: the emergency department and beyond.

Authors:  Catriona Williamson; Matthew James Reed
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Syncope clinical management in the emergency department: a consensus from the first international workshop on syncope risk stratification in the emergency department.

Authors:  Giorgio Costantino; Benjamin C Sun; Franca Barbic; Ilaria Bossi; Giovanni Casazza; Franca Dipaola; Daniel McDermott; James Quinn; Matthew J Reed; Robert S Sheldon; Monica Solbiati; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Daniel Beach; Nicolai Bodemer; Michele Brignole; Ivo Casagranda; Attilio Del Rosso; Piergiorgio Duca; Greta Falavigna; Shamai A Grossman; Roberto Ippoliti; Andrew D Krahn; Nicola Montano; Carlos A Morillo; Brian Olshansky; Satish R Raj; Martin H Ruwald; Francois P Sarasin; Win-Kuang Shen; Ian Stiell; Andrea Ungar; J Gert van Dijk; Nynke van Dijk; Wouter Wieling; Raffaello Furlan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Simple risk stratification score for prognosis of syncope.

Authors:  Daniel Garcia Gomes; Teresa Kus; Roberto Tofani Sant'anna; Gustavo Glotz de Lima; Vidal Essebag; Tiago L Luz Leiria
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Patterns and preexisting risk factors of 30-day mortality after a primary discharge diagnosis of syncope or near syncope.

Authors:  Stephen F Derose; Gelareh Z Gabayan; Vicki Y Chiu; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 5.  San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict short-term serious outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ramon T Saccilotto; Christian H Nickel; Heiner C Bucher; Ewout W Steyerberg; Roland Bingisser; Michael T Koller
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Key challenges in the current management of syncope.

Authors:  Richard Sutton; Michele Brignole; David G Benditt
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Emergency department management of syncope: need for standardization and improved risk stratification.

Authors:  Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Monica Taljaard; Ian G Stiell; Marco L A Sivilotti; Heather Murray; Aparna Vaidyanathan; Brian H Rowe; Lisa A Calder; Eddy Lang; Andrew McRae; Robert Sheldon; George A Wells
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  Syncope and mortality: the critical component of the pathway or an innocent bystander?

Authors:  Satish R Raj
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Substance abuse in emergency department patients with unexplained syncope.

Authors:  Zev Wiener; David Te-Wei Chiu; Nathan Ivan Shapiro; Shamai Aron Grossman
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.397

10.  Prevalence of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Syncope.

Authors:  Giorgio Costantino; Martin H Ruwald; James Quinn; Carlos A Camargo; Frederik Dalgaard; Gunnar Gislason; Tadahiro Goto; Kohei Hasegawa; Padma Kaul; Nicola Montano; Anna-Karin Numé; Antonio Russo; Robert Sheldon; Monica Solbiati; Benjamin Sun; Giovanni Casazza
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.