| Literature DB >> 20170496 |
Günter Vollmer1, Anja Papke, Oliver Zierau.
Abstract
A dry extract from the roots of rhapontic rhubarb (extract Rheum rhaponticum (L.); ERr) has been commercially available in Germany for over two decades to treat menopausal symptoms. However, the molecular basis of its clinical effectiveness remains obscure. This article reviews the in vitro and in vivo data of its estrogenic actions, particularly those mediated by estrogen receptor-beta (ERbeta).Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20170496 PMCID: PMC2837008 DOI: 10.1186/1749-8546-5-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med ISSN: 1749-8546 Impact factor: 5.455
Figure 1Structure of hydroxystilbenes.
Relative binding affinities of major constituents of ERr and estradiol
| Substance | IC50 ERα | IC50 ERβ | Fold preference for ERβ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estradiol | 8 × 10-9 | 6.7 × 10-9 | 0.84 |
| Trans-rhapontigenin | 1.2 × 10-5 | 5.6 × 10-6 | 2.14 |
| Desoxyrhapontigenin | 2.6 × 10-5 | 2.8 × 10-5 | 1.1 |
Note:
Relative binding affinities of trans-rhapontigenin and desoxyrhapontigenin were assessed by a fluorescence polarization assay. IC50 values of compounds in comparison to estradiol and relative preference for the receptor subtypes are shown.
Relative uterotrophic and anti-uterotrophic activities
| ERr 731 (μg/kg BW/d) | Estradiol (mg/kg BW/d) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.5 | 4 | |
| 0 | 100 | 211.5 ± 42.7*** | 576.6 ± 220***/623.8 ± 35.6*** |
| 0.1 | 75.5 ± 9.2/97.3 ± 24.9 | 189.3 ± 46.1*** | -/- |
| 1 | 85 ± 8.7 | 162.8 ± 35.1*** | -/- |
| 10 | 103.3 ± 15.2 | 182.5 ± 31.7*** | -/- |
| 100 | 122.9 ± 13.7/104.2 ± 19.6 | 130 ± 18.1*/++ | -/- |
Note:
The mean ± SD of uterine wet weights expressed as percentage of untreated controls are shown. If two values are shown, they represent means ± SD from two independent experiments.
*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001: statistical significance (Student's t-test) if compared to untreated controls
++P < 0.01: statistical significance (Student's t-test) if compared to low dose estradiol treatment (0.0005 mg/kg BW/d)