Literature DB >> 12948897

The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: coded single-dose studies.

Jun Kanno1, Lesley Onyon, Shyamal Peddada, John Ashby, Elard Jacob, William Owens.   

Abstract

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has completed phase 2 of an international validation program for the rodent uterotrophic bioassay. This portion of phase 2 assessed the reproducibility of the assay with a battery of positive and negative test substances. Positive agonists of the estrogen receptor included the potent reference estrogen 17-ethinyl estradiol (EE), and the weak estrogen agonists bisphenol A, genistein, methoxychlor, nonylphenol, and o,p -DDT. The negative test substance or nonagonist was n-dibutylphthalate. The test substances were coded, and prescribed doses of each test substance were administered in 16 laboratories. Two versions of the uterotrophic assay, the intact immature and the adult ovariectomized female rat, were tested and compared using four standardized protocols covering both sc and po administration. Assay reproducibility was compared using a) EE doses identical to those used in phase 1 and in parallel dose-response studies, b) single doses of the weak agonists identical to one of five doses from the dose-response studies, and c) a single dose of the negative test substance. The results were reproducible and in agreement both within individual laboratories and across the participating laboratories for the same test substance and protocol. The few exceptions are examined in detail. The reproducibility was achieved despite a variety of different experimental conditions (e.g., variations in animal strain, diet, housing protocol, bedding, vehicle, animal age). In conclusion, both versions of the uterotrophic bioassay and all protocols appear robust, reproducible, and transferable across laboratories and able to detect weak estrogen agonists. These results will be submitted along with other data for independent peer review to provide support for the validation of the uterotrophic bioassay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12948897      PMCID: PMC1241660          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.5870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  10 in total

1.  Altered gene profiles in fetal rat testes after in utero exposure to di(n-butyl) phthalate.

Authors:  V D Shultz; S Phillips; M Sar; P M Foster; K W Gaido
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Critical period for adverse effects on development of reproductive system in male offspring of rats given di-n-butyl phthalate during late pregnancy.

Authors:  M Ema; E Miyawaki; K Kawashima
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2000-01-05       Impact factor: 4.372

3.  The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands.

Authors:  R M Blair; H Fang; W S Branham; B S Hass; S L Dial; C L Moland; W Tong; L Shi; R Perkins; D M Sheehan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Adverse effects on development of the reproductive system in male offspring of rats given monobutyl phthalate, a metabolite of dibutyl phthalate, during late pregnancy.

Authors:  M Ema; E Miyawaki
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.143

5.  Disruption of androgen-regulated male reproductive development by di(n-butyl) phthalate during late gestation in rats is different from flutamide.

Authors:  E Mylchreest; M Sar; R C Cattley; P M Foster
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Examination of the in vitro and in vivo estrogenic activities of eight commercial phthalate esters.

Authors:  T R Zacharewski; M D Meek; J H Clemons; Z F Wu; M R Fielden; J B Matthews
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Variability in the uterotrophic response assay (an in vivo estrogenic response assay) in untreated control and positive control (DES-DP, 2.5 microG/kg, bid) Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  M S Christian; A M Hoberman; S Bachmann; J Hellwig
Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.356

8.  Male reproductive tract malformations in rats following gestational and lactational exposure to Di(n-butyl) phthalate: an antiandrogenic mechanism?

Authors:  E Mylchreest; R C Cattley; P M Foster
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dose-response studies.

Authors:  Jun Kanno; Lesley Onyon; Shyamal Peddada; John Ashby; Elard Jacob; William Owens
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay to screen compounds for in vivo estrogenic responses: phase 1.

Authors:  J Kanno; L Onyon; J Haseman; P Fenner-Crisp; J Ashby; W Owens
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total
  16 in total

1.  Statistical inference under order restrictions in analysis of covariance using a modified restricted maximum likelihood estimator.

Authors:  Joshua Betcher; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  Sankhya Ser B       Date:  2009

2.  Comparative uterotrophic effects of endoxifen and tamoxifen in ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Karen M Schweikart; Sandy R Eldridge; Stephanie L Safgren; Toufan Parman; Joel M Reid; Matthew M Ames; Matthew P Goetz; Myrtle A Davis
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 1.902

3.  Treatment of menopausal symptoms by an extract from the roots of rhapontic rhubarb: the role of estrogen receptors.

Authors:  Günter Vollmer; Anja Papke; Oliver Zierau
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 4.  The estrogenic content of rodent diets, bedding, cages, and water bottles and its effect on bisphenol A studies.

Authors:  Julius E Thigpen; Kenneth D R Setchell; Grace E Kissling; Jacqueline Locklear; Gordon F Caviness; Tanya Whiteside; Scott M Belcher; Nadine M Brown; Bradley J Collins; Fred B Lih; Kenneth B Tomer; Elizabeth Padilla-Banks; Luísa Camacho; Floyd G Adsit; Mary Grant
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 5.  Using systematic reviews for hazard and risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Anna Beronius; Laura N Vandenberg
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay: an overview.

Authors:  William Owens; Herman B W M Koëter
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dose-response studies.

Authors:  Jun Kanno; Lesley Onyon; Shyamal Peddada; John Ashby; Elard Jacob; William Owens
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Cumulative dietary energy intake determines the onset of puberty in female rats.

Authors:  Jenny Odum; Helen Tinwell; Graham Tobin; John Ashby
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Tamoxifen-elicited uterotrophy: cross-species and cross-ligand analysis of the gene expression program.

Authors:  Joshua C Kwekel; Agnes L Forgacs; Lyle D Burgoon; Kurt J Williams; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  The intact immature rodent uterotrophic bioassay: possible effects on assay sensitivity of vomeronasal signals from male rodents and strain differences.

Authors:  John Ashby; William Owens; Jenny Odum; Helen Tinwell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.