| Literature DB >> 20170484 |
Massimo Marzorati1, Annalisa Balloi, Francesca de Ferra, Lorenzo Corallo, Giovanna Carpani, Lieven Wittebolle, Willy Verstraete, Daniele Daffonchio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacteria possess a reservoir of metabolic functionalities ready to be exploited for multiple purposes. The use of microorganisms to clean up xenobiotics from polluted ecosystems (e.g. soil and water) represents an eco-sustainable and powerful alternative to traditional remediation processes. Recent developments in molecular-biology-based techniques have led to rapid and accurate strategies for monitoring and identification of bacteria and catabolic genes involved in the degradation of xenobiotics, key processes to follow up the activities in situ.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20170484 PMCID: PMC2834577 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-9-12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Figure 1Pareto-Lorenz distribution of bacterial diversity. Pareto-Lorenz distribution curve of the microbial community's evenness after the biostimulation treatment. The 45° diagonal represents a perfect evenness of a community. The black arrow indicates the OTU cumulative proportion of abundances for an OTU cumulative proportion of 0.2.
16S rRNA gene OTUs in the groundwater bacterial community 15 days after lactate amendment
| OTUa | N. of clones | Accession Number of identified OTUs | Closest database hit | Nt identity and Reference | Phylum | Copies 16S rRNA geneb | Normalized % over total clonesc | Characteristics of the closest described relative | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1** | 26 | 956/978 (97%) | Firmicutes | 6 | 26.6 - 38.2 | 1,2 DCA dechlorinating bacterium | [ | ||
| 2** | 26 | FM204994 | 1480/1489 (99%) | Firmicutes | 5 - 12 | 19.1 - 32.0 | Chlorinated ethanes and 1,2 DCA dechlorinating bacterium | [ | |
| 3** | 17 | 1408/1459 (96%) | Firmicutes | 6 | 17.4 - 25.0 | Couples growth to the reduction of metals and humic acids as well as chlorinated compounds | [ | ||
| 4 | 5 | FM205000 | Uncult Clostridiaceae [AF255644] | 1393/1448 (96%) | Firmicutes | 5 - 12 | 3.7 - 6.1 | Fermentative obligate anaerobe isolated from black mud | [ |
| 5* | 2 | FM204997 | 1466/1484 (98%) | δ-Proteobacteria | 4 | 3.1 - 4.4 | Reductive dehalogenating bacteria | [ | |
| 6* | 3 | FM204996 | Uncult. Clostridium [AB186865] | 1413/1426 (99%) | Firmicutes | 5 - 12 | 2.2 - 3.7 | Acetogenic bacterium from acidic sediments | Drake et al., (Unpublished) |
| 7* | 3 | 1430/1432 (99%) | Firmicutes | 5 - 12 | 2.2 - 3.7 | sulfur-reducing anaerobe isolated from an olive mill wastewater contaminated by phosphogypse | Ben Dhia et al., (Unpublished) | ||
| 8 | 2 | FM204995 | Uncult Clostridiaceae [AF255644] | 1347/1444 (93%) | Firmicutes | 5 - 12 | 1.5 - 2.5 | Fermentative obligate anaerobe isolated from black mud | [ |
| 9 | 1 | FM204999 | Uncult. Bacteroidetes [AJ488070] | 1446/1450 (99%) | Bacteroidetes | 5 - 6 | 1.2 - 1.5 | Propionate-producing bacterium isolated from plant residue in irrigated rice-field | [ |
| 10 | 1 | 1414/1460 (96%) | Firmicutes | 5 - 12 | 0.7 - 1.2 | Bacteria able to convert a number of mono and disaccharides to ethanol, acetic acid, lactic acid, hydrogen and carbon dioxide | [ | ||
| 11 | 1 | FM205002 | Uncult clone PL-5B10 [AY570634] | 1404/1460 (96%) | Firmicutes | 5 - 12 | 0.7 - 1.2 | Thiosulfate-reducing bacterium from an oil-producing well | [ |
| 12* | 1 | FM205005 | Uncult Clostridiaceae [AJ009473] | 1359/1447 (93%) | Bacteroidetes | 5 - 12 | 0.7 - 1.2 | Obligate anaerobic mesophile bacterium isolated from a UASB reactor | Song and Dong (Unpublished) |
a * indicates those clones related to microorganisms identified in community degrading chlorinated compounds; ** indicate those clones related to microorganisms that are well known degraders of chlorinated compounds.
b Based on numbers reported for the same genus or close relatives [54,55,30];
c Percentage of clones normalized for estimated rRNA gene copy number according to numbers reported for the same genus or close relatives
Figure 2RDs sequences phylogenetic tree. Neighbour-joining tree with branch lengths to assess the relationship between DcaA of a previously characterized RD from the contaminated aquifer (RD-54) [Accession number: AM183919] and of D. dichloroeliminans strain DCA1 (RD-DCA1) [AM183918] with other A subunits of already characterized RDs, PceA of Dehalobacter restrictus strain DSMZ 9455T (RD-TCE D. restrictus) [AJ439607], Desulfitobacterium hafniense strain TCE1 (RD-TCE D. hafniense) [AJ439608] and Desulfitobacterium sp. strain Y51 (PCE-D.Y51) [AY706985]. Besides, are also reported the recently identified WL RdhA1, WL RdhA2 and WL RdhA3 [FJ010189, FJ010190, FJ010191] and the RDs identified in enrichment culture (UP RD X). The numbers at each node represent percentage of bootstrap calculated from 1000 replicate trees. The scale bar represents the sequence divergence.
Figure 3Amino acid alignment of the DcaA proteins. Amino acid alignment of the DcaA proteins of groups I (UP-RD-A) and III (UP-RD-4 and UP-RD-G) of the new identified RDs, with: those previously identified in the groundwater (RD-54), in D. dichloroeliminans strain DCA1 (D.d. DCA1) [Accession number AM183919 and AM183918], with PceA of Desulfitobacterium sp. strain Y51 (D. Y51) [AY706985], D. hafniense strain TCE1 (D.h.) [AJ439608], D. restrictus strain DSMZ 9455T (D.r.) [AJ439607], and with the recently identified WL rdhA1 (WL-RdhA1) [FJ010189]. Only the regions including amino acid variations among the different proteins are presented. Red rectangles A and B indicate the protein stretches where it has been previously indicated that resides 53% of the total amino acid diversity between DcaA and PceA [25]. Light blue residues are amino acids specific for the DcaA of the group III, proposed to be specific for the 1,2-DCA RD from Dehalobacter; dark grey residues those specific for the DcaA subunit of the group I, proposed to be specific for the 1,2-DCA RD from Desulfitobacterium; green residues those common to all the RDs identified in the aquifers contaminated by 1,2-DCA but not conserved in the PCE-specific RDs. Asterisks, colons and dots below the alignment indicate an identical position in all the proteins, a position with a conservative substitution and a position with a semi-conservative substitution, respectively.