Literature DB >> 20170458

The Healthy Kids Check - is it evidence-based?

Karyn E Alexander1, Danielle Mazza.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the components of the Healthy Kids Check (HKC), a preschool screening check recently added to the Australian Government's Enhanced Primary Care Program, are supported by evidence-based guidelines or reviews. DATA SOURCES: Guideline and MEDLINE databases were searched for guidelines and systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2008 that were relevant to screening, prevention or well-child care in primary health care, and including children of preschool age. Search subjects reflected the HKC components: growth, weight, obesity, vision, hearing, oral health, enuresis, encopresis, allergic disease and food allergies. STUDY SELECTION: 34 relevant guidelines or reviews were retrieved. DATA EXTRACTION: For each component of the HKC, guidelines addressing the presumed rationale for screening, or the test or tool required to implement it, were reviewed. Relevant evidence-based and consensus-based guideline recommendations were assessed as either supporting or opposing components of the HKC, or stating that the evidence was insufficient to recommend screening of preschool children. DATA SYNTHESIS: Guidelines were often inconsistent in their recommendations. Most of the components of the HKC (eg, screening for chronic otitis media and questioning about toilet habits) are not supported by evidence-based guidelines relevant to the primary care setting, though a number of consensus-based guidelines are supportive.
CONCLUSIONS: There is currently a dearth of evidence relevant to child health surveillance in primary care. The components of the HKC could be refined to better reflect evidence-based guidelines that target health monitoring of preschool children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20170458     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03480.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  6 in total

1.  Can items used in 4-year-old well-child visits predict children's health and school outcomes?

Authors:  Lisa G Smithers; Catherine R Chittleborough; Nigel Stocks; Michael G Sawyer; John W Lynch
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-08

2.  How universal are universal preschool health checks? An observational study using routine data from New Zealand's B4 School Check.

Authors:  Sheree Gibb; Barry Milne; Nichola Shackleton; Barry J Taylor; Richard Audas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  A Realist Synthesis of Literature Informing Programme Theories for Well Child Care in Primary Health Systems of Developed Economies.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; John Eastwood; Siaw-Teng Liaw
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.120

4.  Australian general practitioners' perspectives on their role in well-child health care.

Authors:  Adrian Jeyendra; Jeremy Rajadurai; Joanna Chanmugam; Alan Trieu; Suraj Nair; Radheshan Baskaran; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Barriers and enablers to delivery of the Healthy Kids Check: an analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model.

Authors:  Karyn E Alexander; Bianca Brijnath; Danielle Mazza
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Health professional perceptions regarding screening tools for developmental surveillance for children in a multicultural part of Sydney, Australia.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; My Trinh Ha; John Eastwood; Susan Harvey; Sue Woolfenden; Elisabeth Murphy; Cheryl Dissanayake; Katrina Williams; Bin Jalaludin; Anne McKenzie; Stewart Einfeld; Natalie Silove; Kate Short; Valsamma Eapen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.