Literature DB >> 2017018

Athletic footwear: unsafe due to perceptual illusions.

S E Robbins1, G J Gouw.   

Abstract

Modern athletic footwear provides remarkable plantar comfort when walking, running, or jumping. However, when injurious plantar loads elicit negligible perceived plantar discomfort, a perceptual illusion is created whereby perceived impact is lower than actual impact, which results in inadequate impact-moderating behavior and consequent injury. The objective of this study was to examine how plantar tactile (mechanical) events affect perceived plantar discomfort. Also, we evaluated the feasibility of a footwear safety standard we propose, which requires elimination of the above illusion. Twenty subjects gave numerical estimates of plantar discomfort produced by simulated locomotion (concurrent vertical (0.1-0.7 kg.cm-2) and horizontal (0.1-0.9 kg.cm-2) plantar loads), with the foot supported by either a smooth rigid surface or a rigid surface with 2 mm high rigid irregularities. Vertical or horizontal load alone evoked no discomfort (P greater than 0.05), whereas together, discomfort emanated from loads as low as 0.4 kg.cm-2. Irregularities heightened discomfort by a factor of 1.89. This suggests that the proposed safety standard is feasible, since compliance could be achieved simply by adding surface irregularities to insoles and by other changes that heighten localized plantar loads. However, until this standard is adhered to, it might be more appropriate to classify athletic footwear as "safety hazards" rather than "protective devices".

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2017018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  12 in total

1.  Football boot insoles and sensitivity to extent of ankle inversion movement.

Authors:  G Waddington; R Adams
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Factors associated with ankle injuries. Preventive measures.

Authors:  S Robbins; E Waked
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Sports injury surveillance and protective equipment.

Authors:  C Hrysomallis; W E Morrison
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance.

Authors:  Xiaole Sun; Wing-Kai Lam; Xini Zhang; Junqing Wang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Can running injuries be effectively prevented?

Authors:  W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  The role of shoes in the prevention of ankle sprains.

Authors:  J Barrett; T Bilisko
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Athletic footwear affects balance in men.

Authors:  S Robbins; E Waked; G J Gouw; J McClaran
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  A comparison of lower limb EMG and ground reaction forces between barefoot and shod gait in participants with diabetic neuropathic and healthy controls.

Authors:  Isabel C N Sacco; Paula M H Akashi; Ewald M Hennig
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Pelvic stress injuries in the athlete: management and prevention.

Authors:  Christine Miller; Nancy Major; Alison Toth
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Somatosensory Perception of Running Shoe Mass may be influenced by Extended Wearing Time or Inclusion of a Personal Reference Shoe, Depending on Testing Method.

Authors:  James G Saxton; Benjamin R Mardis; Christopher L Kliethermes; David S Senchina
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.