Literature DB >> 20168089

Upregulation of imprinted genes in mice: an insight into the intensity of gene expression and the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Ismail Zaitoun1, Karen M Downs, Guilherme J M Rosa, Hasan Khatib.   

Abstract

Imprinted genes are expressed monoallelically because one of the two copies is silenced epigentically in a parent-of-origin pattern. This pattern of expression is controlled by differential marking of parental alleles by DNA methylation and chromatin modifications, including both suppressive and permissive histone acetylation and methylation. Suppressive histone modifications mark silenced alleles of imprinted genes, while permissive histone modifications mark the active alleles, suggesting the possibility that imprinted genes would show upregulation in gene expression. However, it is currently unknown whether imprinted genes show such upregulation. To address this question in mice, we estimated the intensity of expression of 59 genes relative to the rest of the genome by analyzing microarray data. Expression levels of 24 genes were validated using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Expression of imprinted genes was found to be upreguled in various adult and embryonic mouse tissues. Consistent with their functions in growth and development, imprinted genes were found to be highly expressed in extraembryonic tissues and progressively upregulated during early embryonic development. In conclusion, upregulation of imprinted genes found in this study is similar to the dosage compensation (twofold upregulation) recently reported for X-linked genes. It has been proposed that the twofold upregulation of X-linked genes has been coupled with low transcriptional variation (noise) which could lead to deleterious effects on the organism. Results of this study suggest a general need for imprinted genes in the mouse to be upregulated to certain levels in order to avoid deleterious effects of variation in gene expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20168089      PMCID: PMC3020655          DOI: 10.4161/epi.5.2.11081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epigenetics        ISSN: 1559-2294            Impact factor:   4.528


  63 in total

1.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene.

Authors:  Ertugrul M Ozbudak; Mukund Thattai; Iren Kurtser; Alan D Grossman; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Skewed X-inactivation in carriers establishes linkage in an X-linked deafness-mental retardation syndrome.

Authors:  Frank J Probst; Peter Hedera; Anthony M Sclafani; Maria Grazia Pomponi; Giovanni Neri; Jessica Tyson; Julie A Douglas; Elizabeth M Petty; Donna M Martin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Disruption of parental-specific expression of imprinted genes in uniparental fetuses.

Authors:  Hidehiko Ogawa; Qiong Wu; Junichi Komiyama; Yayoi Obata; Tomohiro Kono
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  An imprinted gene network that controls mammalian somatic growth is down-regulated during postnatal growth deceleration in multiple organs.

Authors:  Julian C Lui; Gabriela P Finkielstain; Kevin M Barnes; Jeffrey Baron
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 5.  A census of mammalian imprinting.

Authors:  Ian M Morison; Joshua P Ramsay; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Late DNA replication in the paternally derived X chromosome of female kangaroos.

Authors:  G B Sharman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-03-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  X chromosomal abnormalities in basal-like human breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea L Richardson; Zhigang C Wang; Arcangela De Nicolo; Xin Lu; Myles Brown; Alexander Miron; Xiaodong Liao; J Dirk Iglehart; David M Livingston; Shridar Ganesan
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Evolution of chromosome organization driven by selection for reduced gene expression noise.

Authors:  Nizar N Batada; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Cdkn1c (p57Kip2) is the major regulator of embryonic growth within its imprinted domain on mouse distal chromosome 7.

Authors:  Stuart C Andrews; Michelle D Wood; Simon J Tunster; Sheila C Barton; M Azim Surani; Rosalind M John
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 1.978

10.  Dosage compensation in the mouse balances up-regulation and silencing of X-linked genes.

Authors:  Hong Lin; Vibhor Gupta; Matthew D Vermilyea; Francesco Falciani; Jeannie T Lee; Laura P O'Neill; Bryan M Turner
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  8 in total

1.  Placental imprinted gene expression mediates the effects of maternal psychosocial stress during pregnancy on fetal growth.

Authors:  L Lambertini; Q Li; Y Ma; W Zhang; K Hao; C Marsit; J Chen; Y Nomura
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Imprinted gene expression in fetal growth and development.

Authors:  L Lambertini; C J Marsit; P Sharma; M Maccani; Y Ma; J Hu; J Chen
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 3.  Dosage compensation of the sex chromosomes and autosomes.

Authors:  Christine M Disteche
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 4.  Neurodevelopmental consequences in offspring of mothers with preeclampsia during pregnancy: underlying biological mechanism via imprinting genes.

Authors:  Yoko Nomura; Rosalind M John; Anna Bugge Janssen; Charles Davey; Jackie Finik; Jessica Buthmann; Vivette Glover; Luca Lambertini
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Methylome Dynamics of Bovine Gametes and in vivo Early Embryos.

Authors:  Jingyue Ellie Duan; Zongliang Carl Jiang; Fahad Alqahtani; Ion Mandoiu; Hong Dong; Xinbao Zheng; Sadie L Marjani; Jingbo Chen; Xiuchun Cindy Tian
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Excluding Oct4 from Yamanaka Cocktail Unleashes the Developmental Potential of iPSCs.

Authors:  Sergiy Velychko; Kenjiro Adachi; Kee-Pyo Kim; Yanlin Hou; Caitlin M MacCarthy; Guangming Wu; Hans R Schöler
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 24.633

7.  Skewed X-Chromosome Inactivation and Compensatory Upregulation of Escape Genes Precludes Major Clinical Symptoms in a Female With a Large Xq Deletion.

Authors:  Cíntia B Santos-Rebouças; Raquel Boy; Evelyn Q Vianna; Andressa P Gonçalves; Rafael M Piergiorge; Bianca B Abdala; Jussara M Dos Santos; Veluma Calassara; Filipe B Machado; Enrique Medina-Acosta; Márcia M G Pimentel
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Emergence of informative higher scales in biological systems: a computational toolkit for optimal prediction and control.

Authors:  Erik Hoel; Michael Levin
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2020-08-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.