OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of delivery modality on the survival, localization, and functional effects of exogenously administered embryonic stem cells (ESCs) or endothelial cells derived from them (ESC-ECs) in the ischemic hindlimb. METHODS AND RESULTS: Murine ESCs or ESC-ECs were stably transduced with a construct for bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and fluorescent detection. In a syngeneic murine model of limb ischemia, ESCs or ESC-ECs were delivered by intramuscular (IM), intrafemoral artery (IA), or intrafemoral vein injections (n=5 in each group). For 2 weeks, cell survival and localization were tracked by BLI and confirmed by immunohistochemistry, and functional improvement was assessed by laser Doppler perfusion. BLI showed that ESCs localized to the ischemic limb after IM or IA, but not after intrafemoral vein administration. Regardless of the route of administration, ESCs were detected outside the hindlimb circulation in the spleen or lungs. ESCs did not improve limb perfusion and generated teratomas. In contrast, ESC-ECs delivered by all 3 modalities localized to the ischemic limb, as assessed by BLI. Most surprisingly, ESC-EC injected intrafemoral vein eventually localized to the ischemic limb after initially lodging in the pulmonary circulation. Immunohistochemical studies confirmed the engraftment of ESC-ECs into the limb vasculature after 2 weeks. Notably, ESC-ECs were not detected in the spleen or lungs after 2 weeks, regardless of route of administration. Furthermore, ESC-ECs significantly improved limb perfusion and neovascularization compared with the parental ESCs or the vehicle control group. CONCLUSION: In contrast to parental ESCs, ESC-ECs preferentially localized in the ischemic hindlimb by IA, IM, and intrafemoral vein delivery. ESC-ECs engrafted into the ischemic microvasculature, enhanced neovascularization, and improved limb perfusion.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of delivery modality on the survival, localization, and functional effects of exogenously administered embryonic stem cells (ESCs) or endothelial cells derived from them (ESC-ECs) in the ischemic hindlimb. METHODS AND RESULTS:Murine ESCs or ESC-ECs were stably transduced with a construct for bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and fluorescent detection. In a syngeneic murine model of limb ischemia, ESCs or ESC-ECs were delivered by intramuscular (IM), intrafemoral artery (IA), or intrafemoral vein injections (n=5 in each group). For 2 weeks, cell survival and localization were tracked by BLI and confirmed by immunohistochemistry, and functional improvement was assessed by laser Doppler perfusion. BLI showed that ESCs localized to the ischemic limb after IM or IA, but not after intrafemoral vein administration. Regardless of the route of administration, ESCs were detected outside the hindlimb circulation in the spleen or lungs. ESCs did not improve limb perfusion and generated teratomas. In contrast, ESC-ECs delivered by all 3 modalities localized to the ischemic limb, as assessed by BLI. Most surprisingly, ESC-EC injected intrafemoral vein eventually localized to the ischemic limb after initially lodging in the pulmonary circulation. Immunohistochemical studies confirmed the engraftment of ESC-ECs into the limb vasculature after 2 weeks. Notably, ESC-ECs were not detected in the spleen or lungs after 2 weeks, regardless of route of administration. Furthermore, ESC-ECs significantly improved limb perfusion and neovascularization compared with the parental ESCs or the vehicle control group. CONCLUSION: In contrast to parental ESCs, ESC-ECs preferentially localized in the ischemic hindlimb by IA, IM, and intrafemoral vein delivery. ESC-ECs engrafted into the ischemic microvasculature, enhanced neovascularization, and improved limb perfusion.
Authors: Joseph C Wu; Feng Cao; Sucharita Dutta; Xiaoyan Xie; Elmer Kim; Neil Chungfat; Sanjiv Gambhir; Sean Mathewson; Andrew J Connolly; Matthew Brown; Evelyn W Wang Journal: Proteomics Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Ngan F Huang; Shyam Patel; Rahul G Thakar; Jun Wu; Benjamin S Hsiao; Benjamin Chu; Randall J Lee; Song Li Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Gerd P Meyer; Kai C Wollert; Joachim Lotz; Jan Steffens; Peter Lippolt; Stephanie Fichtner; Hartmut Hecker; Arnd Schaefer; Lubomir Arseniev; Bernd Hertenstein; Arnold Ganser; Helmut Drexler Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-03-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Volker Schächinger; Sandra Erbs; Albrecht Elsässer; Werner Haberbosch; Rainer Hambrecht; Hans Hölschermann; Jiangtao Yu; Roberto Corti; Detlef G Mathey; Christian W Hamm; Tim Süselbeck; Birgit Assmus; Torsten Tonn; Stefanie Dimmeler; Andreas M Zeiher Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Rivard; J E Fabre; M Silver; D Chen; T Murohara; M Kearney; M Magner; T Asahara; J M Isner Journal: Circulation Date: 1999 Jan 5-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mingxia Gu; Nicholas M Mordwinkin; Nigel G Kooreman; Jaecheol Lee; Haodi Wu; Shijun Hu; Jared M Churko; Sebastian Diecke; Paul W Burridge; Chunjiang He; Frances E Barron; Sang-Ging Ong; Joseph D Gold; Joseph C Wu Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-11-02 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Abdul Jalil Rufaihah; Ngan F Huang; Sina Jamé; Jerry C Lee; Ha N Nguyen; Blake Byers; Abhijit De; Janet Okogbaa; Mark Rollins; Renee Reijo-Pera; Sanjiv S Gambhir; John P Cooke Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Abbygail A Foster; Ruby E Dewi; Lei Cai; Luqia Hou; Zachary Strassberg; Cynthia A Alcazar; Sarah C Heilshorn; Ngan F Huang Journal: Biomater Sci Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 6.843
Authors: Guosong Hong; Jerry C Lee; Arshi Jha; Shuo Diao; Karina H Nakayama; Luqia Hou; Timothy C Doyle; Joshua T Robinson; Alexander L Antaris; Hongjie Dai; John P Cooke; Ngan F Huang Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Jun Li; Ngan F Huang; Jun Zou; Timothy J Laurent; Jerry C Lee; Janet Okogbaa; John P Cooke; Sheng Ding Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 8.311