BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Color has been shown to facilitate both visual search and recognition tasks. It was our purpose to examine the impact of a color-coding algorithm on the interpretation of 2D-DSA acquisitions by experienced and inexperienced observers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six 2D-DSA acquisitions obtained as part of routine clinical care from subjects with a variety of cerebrovascular disease processes were selected from an internal data base so as to include a variety of disease states (aneurysms, AVMs, fistulas, stenosis, occlusions, dissections, and tumors). Three experienced and 3 less experienced observers were each shown the acquisitions on a prerelease version of a commercially available double-monitor workstation (XWP, Siemens Healthcare). Acquisitions were presented first as a subtracted image series and then as a single composite color-coded image of the entire acquisition. Observers were then asked a series of questions designed to assess the value of the color-coded images for the following purposes: 1) to enhance their ability to make a diagnosis, 2) to have confidence in their diagnosis, 3) to plan a treatment, and 4) to judge the effect of a treatment. The results were analyzed by using 1-sample Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: Color-coded images enhanced the ease of evaluating treatment success in >40% of cases (P < .0001). They also had a statistically significant impact on treatment planning, making planning easier in >20% of the cases (P = .0069). In >20% of the examples, color-coding made diagnosis and treatment planning easier for all readers (P < .0001). Color-coding also increased the confidence of diagnosis compared with the use of DSA alone (P = .056). The impact of this was greater for the naïve readers than for the expert readers. CONCLUSIONS: At no additional cost in x-ray dose or contrast medium, color-coding of DSA enhanced the conspicuity of findings on DSA images. It was particularly useful in situations in which there was a complex flow pattern and in evaluation of pre- and posttreatment acquisitions. Its full potential remains to be defined.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Color has been shown to facilitate both visual search and recognition tasks. It was our purpose to examine the impact of a color-coding algorithm on the interpretation of 2D-DSA acquisitions by experienced and inexperienced observers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six 2D-DSA acquisitions obtained as part of routine clinical care from subjects with a variety of cerebrovascular disease processes were selected from an internal data base so as to include a variety of disease states (aneurysms, AVMs, fistulas, stenosis, occlusions, dissections, and tumors). Three experienced and 3 less experienced observers were each shown the acquisitions on a prerelease version of a commercially available double-monitor workstation (XWP, Siemens Healthcare). Acquisitions were presented first as a subtracted image series and then as a single composite color-coded image of the entire acquisition. Observers were then asked a series of questions designed to assess the value of the color-coded images for the following purposes: 1) to enhance their ability to make a diagnosis, 2) to have confidence in their diagnosis, 3) to plan a treatment, and 4) to judge the effect of a treatment. The results were analyzed by using 1-sample Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: Color-coded images enhanced the ease of evaluating treatment success in >40% of cases (P < .0001). They also had a statistically significant impact on treatment planning, making planning easier in >20% of the cases (P = .0069). In >20% of the examples, color-coding made diagnosis and treatment planning easier for all readers (P < .0001). Color-coding also increased the confidence of diagnosis compared with the use of DSA alone (P = .056). The impact of this was greater for the naïve readers than for the expert readers. CONCLUSIONS: At no additional cost in x-ray dose or contrast medium, color-coding of DSA enhanced the conspicuity of findings on DSA images. It was particularly useful in situations in which there was a complex flow pattern and in evaluation of pre- and posttreatment acquisitions. Its full potential remains to be defined.
Authors: J R Reichenbach; J Röther; L Jonetz-Mentzel; M Herzau; A Fiala; C Weiller; W A Kaiser Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1999 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J T Cusma; E J Toggart; J D Folts; W W Peppler; N J Hangiandreou; C S Lee; C A Mistretta Journal: Circulation Date: 1987-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A S Ahmed; Y Deuerling-Zheng; C M Strother; K A Pulfer; M Zellerhoff; T Redel; K Royalty; D Consigny; M J Lindstrom; D B Niemann Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-05-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: C J Lin; S C Hung; W Y Guo; F C Chang; C B Luo; J Beilner; M Kowarschik; W F Chu; C Y Chang Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: H-H Cho; J-E Cheon; S-K Kim; Y H Choi; I-O Kim; W S Kim; S-M Lee; S K You; S-M Shin Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: K H Narsinh; K Mueller; J Nelson; J Massachi; D C Murph; A Z Copelan; S W Hetts; V V Halbach; R T Higashida; A A Abla; M R Amans; C F Dowd; H Kim; D L Cooke Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: P Gölitz; T Struffert; H Lücking; J Rösch; F Knossalla; O Ganslandt; Y Deuerling-Zheng; A Doerfler Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 3.649