Literature DB >> 20167414

Associations and dissociations of transitive and intransitive gestures in left and right hemisphere stroke patients.

Vessela Stamenova1, Eric A Roy, Sandra E Black.   

Abstract

The study investigated performance on pantomime and imitation of transitive and intransitive gestures in 80 stroke patients, 42 with left (LHD) and 38 with right (RHD) hemisphere damage. Patients were also categorized in two groups based on the time that has elapsed between their stroke and the apraxia assessment: acute-subacute (n=42) and chronic (n=38). In addition, patterns of performance in apraxia were examined. We expected that acute-subacute patients would be more impaired than chronic patients and that LHD patients would be more impaired than RHD patients, relative to controls. The hemisphere prediction was confirmed, replicating previous findings. The frequency of apraxia was also higher in all LHD time post-stroke groups. The most common impairment after LHD was impairment in both pantomime and imitation in both transitive and intransitive gestures. Selective deficits in imitation were more frequent after RHD for transitive gestures but for intransitive gestures they were more frequent after LHD. Patients were more impaired on imitation than pantomime, relative to controls. In addition, after looking at both gesture types concurrently, we have described cases of patients who suffered deficits in pantomime of intransitive gestures with preserved performance on transitive gestures. Such cases show that the right hemisphere may be in some cases critical for the successful pantomime of intransitive gestures and the neural networks subserving them may be distinct. Chronic patients were also less impaired than acute-subacute patients, even though the difference did not reach significance. A longitudinal study is needed to examine the recovery patterns in both LHD and RHD patients. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20167414     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  13 in total

1.  The effect of aging and contextual information on manual asymmetry in tool use.

Authors:  Tea Lulic; Jacquelyn M Maciukiewicz; David A Gonzalez; Eric A Roy; Clark R Dickerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  A neuropsychological perspective on the link between language and praxis in modern humans.

Authors:  Agnes Roby-Brami; Joachim Hermsdörfer; Alice C Roy; Stéphane Jacobs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  A Cognitive Overview of Limb Apraxia.

Authors:  Angela Bartolo; Heidi Stieglitz Ham
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Abnormal dynamics of activation of object use information in apraxia: evidence from eyetracking.

Authors:  Chia-Iin Lee; Daniel Mirman; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Specialization of the left supramarginal gyrus for hand-independent praxis representation is not related to hand dominance.

Authors:  Gregory Króliczak; Brian J Piper; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Tool use disorders after left brain damage.

Authors:  Josselin Baumard; François Osiurak; Mathieu Lesourd; Didier Le Gall
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-21

7.  The effects of visual half-field priming on the categorization of familiar intransitive gestures, tool use pantomimes, and meaningless hand movements.

Authors:  Honorata Helon; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-27

8.  Insights into the neural mechanisms underlying hand praxis: implications for the neurocognitive rehabilitation of apraxia.

Authors:  Jorge Oliveira; Rodrigo Brito
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-09

9.  U-Limb: A multi-modal, multi-center database on arm motion control in healthy and post-stroke conditions.

Authors:  Giuseppe Averta; Federica Barontini; Vincenzo Catrambone; Sami Haddadin; Giacomo Handjaras; Jeremia P O Held; Tingli Hu; Eike Jakubowitz; Christoph M Kanzler; Johannes Kühn; Olivier Lambercy; Andrea Leo; Alina Obermeier; Emiliano Ricciardi; Anne Schwarz; Gaetano Valenza; Antonio Bicchi; Matteo Bianchi
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  Left extrastriate body area is sensitive to the meaning of symbolic gesture: evidence from fMRI repetition suppression.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kubiak; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.