Literature DB >> 20166795

Predictors of placebo response in randomized controlled trials of psychotropic drugs for children and adolescents with internalizing disorders.

David Cohen1, Angèle Consoli, Nicolas Bodeau, Diane Purper-Ouakil, Emmanuelle Deniau, Jean-Marc Guile, Craig Donnelly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess predictors of placebo response in all available short-term, placebo-controlled trials of psychotropic drugs for children and adolescents with internalizing disorders, major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD,) and anxiety disorders (ANX) exclusive of OCD and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
METHOD: We reviewed the literature relevant to the use of psychotropic medication in children and adolescents with internalizing disorders, restricting our review to double-blind studies including a placebo arm. Placebo response, defined according to each trial's primary response outcome variable and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement, when available, and potential predictive variables were extracted from 40 studies.
RESULTS: From 1972 to 2007, we found 23 trials that evaluated the efficacy of psychotropic medication involving youth with MDD, 7 pertaining to youths with OCD, and 10 pertaining to youths with ANX (N = 2,533 patients in placebo arms). For all internalizing disorders combined, predictors of nonresponse to placebo were the percentage of Caucasian patients included in the study and the duration of the disorder: Both variables were negatively correlated with the percent of placebo responders. The type of disorder was found to predict the robustness of placebo response: (OCD < ANX < MDD). For a subset of MDD studies, we found that baseline illness severity tended to be negatively correlated with placebo response. Finally, trial "success" was significantly associated with lower placebo response rate.
CONCLUSION: Predictors of placebo response in internalizing disorders of youths parallel those in adult studies, with the exception of race. These predictors should be considered when designing placebo-controlled trials in youths to enhance findings of true drug-placebo differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20166795     DOI: 10.1089/cap.2009.0047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1044-5463            Impact factor:   2.576


  20 in total

1.  Placebo response rates and potential modifiers in double-blind randomized controlled trials of second and newer generation antidepressants for major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Ramona Meister; Mariam Abbas; Jochen Antel; Triinu Peters; Yiqi Pan; Ulrike Bingel; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Johannes Hebebrand
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Factors Associated With Response to Placebo in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Constipation.

Authors:  Sarah Ballou; Alissa Beath; Ted J Kaptchuk; William Hirsch; Thomas Sommers; Judy Nee; Johanna Iturrino; Vikram Rangan; Prashant Singh; Mike Jones; Anthony Lembo
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for depression in children and adolescents: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhou; Sarah E Hetrick; Pim Cuijpers; Bin Qin; Jürgen Barth; Craig J Whittington; David Cohen; Cinzia Del Giovane; Yiyun Liu; Kurt D Michael; Yuqing Zhang; John R Weisz; Peng Xie
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Paliperidone Extended Release 1.5 mg/day-A Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Study in the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Danielle Coppola; Rama Melkote; Caroline Lannie; Jaskaran Singh; Isaac Nuamah; Srihari Gopal; David Hough; Joseph Palumbo
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2011-05-15

Review 5.  Pain and placebo in pediatrics: a comprehensive review of laboratory and clinical findings.

Authors:  Kanesha Simmons; Robin Ortiz; Joe Kossowsky; Peter Krummenacher; Christian Grillon; Daniel Pine; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Predicting Therapeutic Effects of Psychodiagnostic Assessment Among Children and Adolescents Participating in Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Andrea S Young; Molly R Meers; Anthony T Vesco; Adina M Seidenfeld; L Eugene Arnold; Mary A Fristad
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2016-04-22

7.  Comparison among clomipramine, fluoxetine, and placebo for the treatment of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Carolina Zadrozny Gouvêa da Costa; Rosa Magaly Campelo Borba de Morais; Dirce Maria Trevisan Zanetta; Gizela Turkiewicz; Francisco Lotufo Neto; Márcia Morikawa; Camila Luisi Rodrigues; Eunice Monteiro Labbadia; Fernando Ramos Asbahr
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.576

8.  A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Placebo Responders in Late-Life Depression Trials.

Authors:  Sigal Zilcha-Mano; Steven P Roose; Patrick J Brown; Bret R Rutherford
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 9.  Evidence-based treatments for youths with severely dysregulated mood: a qualitative systematic review of trials for SMD and DMDD.

Authors:  Xavier Benarous; Angèle Consoli; Jean-Marc Guilé; Sébastien Garny de La Rivière; David Cohen; Bertrand Olliac
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.785

10.  The role of pretreatment outcome expectancies and cognitive-behavioral skills in symptom improvement in an acute psychiatric setting.

Authors:  Christian A Webb; Sarah J Kertz; Joe S Bigda-Peyton; Thröstur Björgvinsson
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.839

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.