Literature DB >> 20166418

Adhesive bond strengths to enamel and dentin using recommended and extended treatment times.

Nicole S Kimmes1, Wayne W Barkmeier, Robert L Erickson, Mark A Latta.   

Abstract

This study examined the effect of different enamel and dentin conditioning times on the shear bond strength of a resin composite using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems. Shear bond strengths were determined following treatment of flat ground human enamel and dentin surfaces (4000 grit) with 11 adhesive systems: 1) AdheSE One Viva Pen-(ASE), 2) Adper Prompt L-Pop-(PLP), 3) Adper Single Bond Plus-(SBP), 4) Clearfil SE Bond-(CSE), 5) Clearfil S3 Bond-(CS3), 6) OptiBond All-In-One-(OBA), 7) OptiBond Solo Plus-(OBS), 8) Peak SE-(PSE), 9) Xeno IV-(X4), 10) Xeno V-(X5) and 11) XP Bond-(XPB) using recommended treatment times and an extended treatment time of 60 seconds (n = 10/group). Composite (Z100) to enamel and dentin bond strengths (24 hours) were determined using Ultradent fixtures and debonded with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The data were analyzed with a three-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's LSD post hoc test. The highest shear bond strengths (MPa) to enamel were achieved by the three etch-and-rinse systems at both the recommended treatment time (SBP-40.5 +/- 6.1; XPB-38.7 +/- 3.7; OBS- 35.2 +/- 6.2) and the extended treatment time (SBP-44.5 +/- 8.1; XPB-40.9 +/- 5.7; OBS-35.0 +/- 4.5). Extending the enamel treatment time did not produce a significant change (p > 0.05) in bond strength for the 11 adhesive systems tested. OBS generated the highest (46.2 +/- 7.9) bond strengths to dentin at the recommended treatment time. At the extended treatment time X4 (42.2 +/- 11.7), PSE (42.1 +/- 9.7) and OBS (41.4 +/- 8.0) produced the highest bond strengths to dentin. The bond strength change between recommend and extended treatment times was significant (p < 0.05) for PSE, but the other 10 systems did not exhibit any significant change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20166418     DOI: 10.2341/09-081-L

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  6 in total

1.  Biocompatibility and bond degradation of poly-acrylic acid coated copper iodide-adhesives.

Authors:  Adi ALGhanem; Gabriela Fernandes; Michelle Visser; Rosemary Dziak; Walter G Renné; Camila Sabatini
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Two-year clinical performance of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: Influence of subject's age and dentin etching time.

Authors:  David Cardoso Sandes Farias; Guilherme Carpena Lopes; Luiz Narciso Baratieri
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Bond strength of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems to enamel and dentin irradiated with a novel CO2 9.3 μm short-pulsed laser for dental restorative procedures.

Authors:  Peter Rechmann; N Bartolome; R Kinsel; R Vaderhobli; B M T Rechmann
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Factors affecting the bond strength of self-etch adhesives: A meta-analysis of literature.

Authors:  P Pranau Vanajasan; Malarvizhi Dhakshinamoorthy; Cv Subba Rao
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-01

5.  Shear Bond Strength of Three Composite Resins to Fluorosed and Sound Dentine: In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Sabra Jaâfoura; Amira Kikly; Saida Sahtout; Mounir Trabelsi; Dorra Kammoun
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-04-09

6.  Do the microshear test variables affect the bond strength values?

Authors:  Andrea M Andrade; Eugenio Garcia; Sandra Kiss Moura; Alessandra Reis; Alessandro Loguercio; Luciana Mendonça Silva; Gustavo H D Pimentel; Rosa Helena Miranda Grande
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-11-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.