CONTEXT: Teriparatide increases both bone formation and bone resorption. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether combining teriparatide with an antiresorptive agent would alter its anabolic action. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted in a single university hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: We randomized 93 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) toalendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 40 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months. Teriparatide was begun at month 6. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BMD of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, proximal radius, andtotal body was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) every 6 months. Lumbar spine trabecular BMD was measured at baseline and month 30 by quantitative computed tomography. Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and N-telopeptide levels were assessed frequently. Women who had at least one repeat DXA scan on therapy were included in the analyses (n = 69). RESULTS:DXA spine BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (18 +/- 11 vs. 7 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (18+/-11 vs. 12 +/- 9%; P = 0.045). Similarly, femoral neck BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (11 +/- 5 vs. 4 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (11 +/- 5 vs. 3 +/- 5%; P < 0.001). Quantitative computed tomography spine BMD increased 1 +/- 7, 61 +/- 31, and 24 +/- 24% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen increased more with teriparatide alone than with both (P < 0.001 for each marker). CONCLUSION:Alendronate reduces the ability of teriparatide to increase BMD and bone turnover in women.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Teriparatide increases both bone formation and bone resorption. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether combining teriparatide with an antiresorptive agent would alter its anabolic action. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted in a single university hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: We randomized 93 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) to alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 40 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months. Teriparatide was begun at month 6. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BMD of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, proximal radius, and total body was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) every 6 months. Lumbar spine trabecular BMD was measured at baseline and month 30 by quantitative computed tomography. Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and N-telopeptide levels were assessed frequently. Women who had at least one repeat DXA scan on therapy were included in the analyses (n = 69). RESULTS: DXA spine BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (18 +/- 11 vs. 7 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (18+/-11 vs. 12 +/- 9%; P = 0.045). Similarly, femoral neck BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (11 +/- 5 vs. 4 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (11 +/- 5 vs. 3 +/- 5%; P < 0.001). Quantitative computed tomography spine BMD increased 1 +/- 7, 61 +/- 31, and 24 +/- 24% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen increased more with teriparatide alone than with both (P < 0.001 for each marker). CONCLUSION:Alendronate reduces the ability of teriparatide to increase BMD and bone turnover in women.
Authors: Louis G Ste-Marie; Sherwyn L Schwartz; Anwar Hossain; Durisala Desaiah; Gregory A Gaich Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2005-10-31 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Joel S Finkelstein; Benjamin Z Leder; Sherri-Ann M Burnett; Jason J Wyland; Hang Lee; Amanda Victoria de la Paz; Kate Gibson; Robert M Neer Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-05-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Michael R McClung; Javier San Martin; Paul D Miller; Roberto Civitelli; Francisco Bandeira; Molly Omizo; David W Donley; Gail P Dalsky; Erik F Eriksen Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005 Aug 8-22
Authors: M M Hurley; Y Okada; L Xiao; Y Tanaka; M Ito; N Okimoto; T Nakamura; C J Rosen; T Doetschman; J D Coffin Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Susan L Greenspan; Henry G Bone; Mark P Ettinger; David A Hanley; Robert Lindsay; Jose R Zanchetta; Consuelo M Blosch; Annette L Mathisen; Stephen A Morris; Thomas B Marriott Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Steven Boonen; Fernando Marin; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Maria E Simões; Clare Barker; Emmett V Glass; Peyman Hadji; George Lyritis; Heide Oertel; Thomas Nickelsen; Eugene V McCloskey Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-12-26 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: S R Cummings; D M Black; D E Thompson; W B Applegate; E Barrett-Connor; T A Musliner; L Palermo; R Prineas; S M Rubin; J C Scott; T Vogt; R Wallace; A J Yates; A Z LaCroix Journal: JAMA Date: 1998 Dec 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Yu Shao; Selene Hernandez-Buquer; Paul Childress; Keith R Stayrook; Marta B Alvarez; Hannah Davis; Lilian I Plotkin; Yongzheng He; Keith W Condon; David B Burr; Stuart J Warden; Alexander G Robling; Feng-Chun Yang; Ronald C Wek; Matthew R Allen; Joseph P Bidwell Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Joy N Tsai; Yuli Zhu; Katelyn Foley; Hang Lee; Sherri-Ann Burnett-Bowie; Robert M Neer; Benjamin Z Leder Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Marcella D Walker; Natalie E Cusano; James Sliney; Megan Romano; Chiyuan Zhang; Donald J McMahon; John P Bilezikian Journal: Endocrine Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Allison R Altman; Wei-Ju Tseng; Chantal M J de Bakker; Beom Kang Huh; Abhishek Chandra; Ling Qin; X Sherry Liu Journal: Bone Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 4.398