Literature DB >> 14570949

Psychosocial factors and risk of hypertension: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.

Lijing L Yan1, Kiang Liu, Karen A Matthews, Martha L Daviglus, T Freeman Ferguson, Catarina I Kiefe.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although psychosocial factors are correlated, previous studies on risk factors for hypertension have typically examined psychosocial factors individually and have yielded inconsistent findings.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of psychosocial factors of time urgency/impatience (TUI), achievement striving/competitiveness (ASC), hostility, depression, and anxiety on long-term risk of hypertension. DESIGN, SETTING, AND STUDY POPULATION: A population-based, prospective, observational study using participant data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. A total of 3308 black and white adults aged 18 to 30 years (when recruited in 1985 and 1986) from 4 US metropolitan areas and followed up through 2000 to 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fifteen-year cumulative incidence of hypertension (systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or higher, diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher, or taking antihypertensive medication).
RESULTS: The incidence of hypertension at year 15 was 15% from baseline and 13.6% from year 5. After adjusting for the same set of hypertension risk factors and each of the psychosocial factors of TUI, ASC, hostility, depression, and anxiety in 5 separate logistic regression models, higher TUI and hostility were significantly associated with risk of developing hypertension at 15-year follow-up for the total sample. Compared with the lowest score group, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for TUI was 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.03) for a score of 1; 1.47 (95% CI, 1.08-2.02) for a score of 2; and 1.84 (95% CI, 1.29-2.62) for a score of 3 to 4 (P for trend =.001). Compared with the lowest quartile group, the adjusted OR for hostility was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.76-1.47) for quartile 2; 1.38 (95% CI, 1.00-1.91) for quartile 3; and 1.84 (95% CI, 1.33-2.54) for quartile 4 (P for trend <.001). No consistent patterns were found for ASC, depression, or anxiety. Race- and sex-specific analyses and multivariable models with simultaneous adjustment for all 5 psychosocial factors and other hypertension risk factors had generally similar results.
CONCLUSION: Among young adults, TUI and hostility were associated with a dose-response increase in the long-term risk of hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14570949     DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  112 in total

1.  Associations between positive and negative affect and 12-month physical disorders in a national sample.

Authors:  Eric B Weiser
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2012-06

2.  Associations between psychosocial work environment and hypertension among non-Western immigrant and Danish cleaners.

Authors:  Kasper Olesen; Isabella G Carneiro; Marie B Jørgensen; Reiner Rugulies; Charlotte D N Rasmussen; Karen Søgaard; Andreas Holtermann; Mari-Ann Flyvholm
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Look on the bright side: do the benefits of optimism depend on the social nature of the stressor?

Authors:  Alexandra L Terrill; John M Ruiz; John P Garofalo
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-06-20

Review 4.  The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity.

Authors:  Marco Del Giudice; Bruce J Ellis; Elizabeth A Shirtcliff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Race/ethnicity, income, major risk factors, and cardiovascular disease mortality.

Authors:  Avis J Thomas; Lynn E Eberly; George Davey Smith; James D Neaton; Jeremiah Stamler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Effects of spiritual mantram repetition on HIV outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jill E Bormann; Allen L Gifford; Martha Shively; Tom L Smith; Laura Redwine; Ann Kelly; Sheryl Becker; Madeline Gershwin; Patricia Bone; Wendy Belding
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-07-18

Review 7.  Status of cardiovascular disease and stroke in Hispanics/Latinos in the United States: a science advisory from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Carlos J Rodriguez; Matthew Allison; Martha L Daviglus; Carmen R Isasi; Colleen Keller; Enrique C Leira; Latha Palaniappan; Ileana L Piña; Sarah M Ramirez; Beatriz Rodriguez; Mario Sims
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  State of the Art Review: Depression, Stress, Anxiety, and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Beth E Cohen; Donald Edmondson; Ian M Kronish
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Taking rejection to heart: Associations between blood pressure and sensitivity to social pain.

Authors:  Tristen K Inagaki; J Richard Jennings; Naomi I Eisenberger; Peter J Gianaros
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 10.  Stress, Genes, and Hypertension. Contribution of the ISIAH Rat Strain Study.

Authors:  Olga E Redina; Arcady L Markel
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.