BACKGROUND: Variation in individual behavior within social groups can affect the fitness of the group as well as the individual, and can be caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. However, the molecular factors associated with individual variation in social behavior remain relatively unexplored. We used honey bees (Apis mellifera) as a model to examine differences in socially-regulated behavior among individual workers, and used transcriptional profiling to determine if specific gene expression patterns are associated with these individual differences. In honey bees, the reproductive queen produces a pheromonal signal that regulates many aspects of worker behavior and physiology and maintains colony organization. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here, we demonstrate that there is substantial natural variation in individual worker attraction to queen pheromone (QMP). Furthermore, worker attraction is negatively correlated with ovariole number-a trait associated with reproductive potential in workers. We identified transcriptional differences in the adult brain associated with individual worker attraction to QMP, and identified hundreds of transcripts that are organized into statistically-correlated gene networks and associated with this response. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our studies demonstrate that there is substantial variation in worker attraction to QMP among individuals, and that this variation is linked with specific differences in physiology and brain gene expression patterns. This variation in individual response thresholds may reveal underlying variation in queen-worker reproductive conflict, and may mediate colony function and productivity by creating variation in individual task performance.
BACKGROUND: Variation in individual behavior within social groups can affect the fitness of the group as well as the individual, and can be caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. However, the molecular factors associated with individual variation in social behavior remain relatively unexplored. We used honey bees (Apis mellifera) as a model to examine differences in socially-regulated behavior among individual workers, and used transcriptional profiling to determine if specific gene expression patterns are associated with these individual differences. In honey bees, the reproductive queen produces a pheromonal signal that regulates many aspects of worker behavior and physiology and maintains colony organization. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here, we demonstrate that there is substantial natural variation in individual worker attraction to queen pheromone (QMP). Furthermore, worker attraction is negatively correlated with ovariole number-a trait associated with reproductive potential in workers. We identified transcriptional differences in the adult brain associated with individual worker attraction to QMP, and identified hundreds of transcripts that are organized into statistically-correlated gene networks and associated with this response. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our studies demonstrate that there is substantial variation in worker attraction to QMP among individuals, and that this variation is linked with specific differences in physiology and brain gene expression patterns. This variation in individual response thresholds may reveal underlying variation in queen-worker reproductive conflict, and may mediate colony function and productivity by creating variation in individual task performance.
Authors: R D Wolfinger; G Gibson; E D Wolfinger; L Bennett; H Hamadeh; P Bushel; C Afshari; R S Paules Journal: J Comput Biol Date: 2001 Impact factor: 1.479
Authors: Molly E Cummings; Jonah Larkins-Ford; Christian R L Reilly; Ryan Y Wong; Mary Ramsey; Hans A Hofmann Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2008-02-22 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Ying Wang; Sarah D Kocher; Timothy A Linksvayer; Christina M Grozinger; Robert E Page; Gro V Amdam Journal: J Exp Biol Date: 2012-01-01 Impact factor: 3.312
Authors: Etya Amsalem; Mario Padilla; Paul M Schreiber; Naomi S Altman; Abraham Hefetz; Christina M Grozinger Journal: J Chem Ecol Date: 2017-06-24 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: Brendon L Fussnecker; Alexander M McKenzie; Christina M Grozinger Journal: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 1.836
Authors: Francis M F Nunes; Aline C Aleixo; Angel R Barchuk; Ana D Bomtorin; Christina M Grozinger; Zilá L P Simões Journal: Insects Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 2.769
Authors: Bart A Pannebakker; Urmi Trivedi; Mark L Blaxter; Mark A Blaxter; Rebekah Watt; David M Shuker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Amy L Toth; John F Tooker; Srihari Radhakrishnan; Robert Minard; Michael T Henshaw; Christina M Grozinger Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.969