Literature DB >> 20161014

Automatic processing of wh- and NP-movement in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking.

Michael Walsh Dickey1, Cynthia K Thompson.   

Abstract

Individuals with agrammatic Broca's aphasia show deficits in comprehension of non-canonical wh-movement and NP-movement sentences. Previous work using eyetracking has found that agrammatic and unimpaired listeners show very similar patterns of automatic processing for wh-movement sentences. The current study attempts to replicate this finding for sentences with wh-movement (in object relatives in the current study) and to extend it to sentences with NP movement (passives). For wh-movement sentences, aphasic and control participants' eye-movements differed most dramatically in late regions of the sentence and post-offset, with aphasic participants exhibiting lingering attention to a salient but grammatically impermissible competitor. The eye-movement differences between correct and incorrect trials for wh-movement sentences were similar, with incorrect trials also exhibiting competition from an impermissible interpretation late in the sentence. Furthermore, the two groups exhibited similar eye-movement patterns in response to passive NP-movement sentences, but showed little evidence of gap-filling for passives. The results suggest that aphasic and unimpaired individuals may generate similar representations during comprehension, but that aphasics are highly vulnerable to interference from alternative interpretations (Ferreira, 2003).

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20161014      PMCID: PMC2748948          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurolinguistics        ISSN: 0911-6044            Impact factor:   1.710


  29 in total

1.  What the eyes say about speaking.

Authors:  Z M Griffin; K Bock
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

2.  Visual arguments.

Authors:  Julie E Boland
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12-22

3.  Generalizations on variations in comprehension and production: a further source of variation and a possible account.

Authors:  Naama Friedmann
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  A new empirical angle on the variability debate: quantitative neurosyntactic analyses of a large data set from Broca's aphasia.

Authors:  Dan Drai; Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 5.  Cognitive control and parsing: reexamining the role of Broca's area in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Jared M Novick; John C Trueswell; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences.

Authors:  Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Semantic influences on thematic role assignment: evidence from normals and aphasics.

Authors:  E M Saffran; M F Schwartz; M C Linebarger
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 8.  Comprehension and acceptability judgments in agrammatism: disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency.

Authors:  G Mauner; V A Fromkin; T L Cornell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Sentence production by aphasic patients in a constrained task.

Authors:  D Caplan; J E Hanna
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Treating agrammatic aphasia within a linguistic framework: Treatment of Underlying Forms.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Lewis P Shapiro
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.773

View more
  14 in total

1.  Tracking Passive Sentence Comprehension in Agrammatic Aphasia.

Authors:  Aaron M Meyer; Jennifer E Mack; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Deficit-lesion correlations in syntactic comprehension in aphasia.

Authors:  David Caplan; Jennifer Michaud; Rebecca Hufford; Nikos Makris
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  What Goes Wrong during Passive Sentence Production in Agrammatic Aphasia: An Eyetracking Study.

Authors:  Soojin Cho; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.773

4.  Pronominal resolution and gap filling in agrammatic aphasia: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Jungwon Janet Choy
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-04-16

5.  A case for conflict across multiple domains: memory and language impairments following damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jared M Novick; Irene P Kan; John C Trueswell; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Looking for a Location: Dissociated Effects of Event-Related Plausibility and Verb-Argument Information on Predictive Processing in Aphasia.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hayes; Michael Walsh Dickey; Tessa Warren
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Tracking sentence comprehension: Test-retest reliability in people with aphasia and unimpaired adults.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Andrew Zu-Sern Wei; Stephanie Gutierrez; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.710

8.  The Auditory Comprehension of Wh-Questions in Aphasia: Support for the Intervener Hypothesis.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Matthew Walenski; Tracy Love; Lewis P Shapiro
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Effects of verb meaning on lexical integration in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Woohyuk Ji; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.710

10.  Dissociations and associations of performance in syntactic comprehension in aphasia and their implications for the nature of aphasic deficits.

Authors:  David Caplan; Jennifer Michaud; Rebecca Hufford
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.