Literature DB >> 20160879

An Evaluation of Explicit Receptor Flexibility in Molecular Docking Using Molecular Dynamics and Torsion Angle Molecular Dynamics.

Roger S Armen1, Jianhan Chen, Charles L Brooks.   

Abstract

Incorporating receptor flexibility into molecular docking should improve results for flexible proteins. However, the incorporation of explicit all-atom flexibility with molecular dynamics for the entire protein chain may also introduce significant error and "noise" that could decrease docking accuracy and deteriorate the ability of a scoring function to rank native-like poses. We address this apparent paradox by comparing the success of several flexible receptor models in cross-docking and multiple receptor ensemble docking for p38α mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase. Explicit all-atom receptor flexibility has been incorporated into a CHARMM-based molecular docking method (CDOCKER) using both molecular dynamics (MD) and torsion angle molecular dynamics (TAMD) for the refinement of predicted protein-ligand binding geometries. These flexible receptor models have been evaluated, and the accuracy and efficiency of TAMD sampling is directly compared to MD sampling. Several flexible receptor models are compared, encompassing flexible side chains, flexible loops, multiple flexible backbone segments, and treatment of the entire chain as flexible. We find that although including side chain and some backbone flexibility is required for improved docking accuracy as expected, docking accuracy also diminishes as additional and unnecessary receptor flexibility is included into the conformational search space. Ensemble docking results demonstrate that including protein flexibility leads to to improved agreement with binding data for 227 active compounds. This comparison also demonstrates that a flexible receptor model enriches high affinity compound identification without significantly increasing the number of false positives from low affinity compounds.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20160879      PMCID: PMC2772076          DOI: 10.1021/ct900262t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  53 in total

1.  Design and synthesis of 4-azaindoles as inhibitors of p38 MAP kinase.

Authors:  Alejandra Trejo; Humberto Arzeno; Michelle Browner; Sushmita Chanda; Soan Cheng; Daniel D Comer; Stacie A Dalrymple; Pete Dunten; JoAnn Lafargue; Brett Lovejoy; Jose Freire-Moar; Julie Lim; Joel Mcintosh; Jennifer Miller; Eva Papp; Deborah Reuter; Rick Roberts; Florentino Sanpablo; John Saunders; Kyung Song; Armando Villasenor; Stephen D Warren; Mary Welch; Paul Weller; Phyllis E Whiteley; Lu Zeng; David M Goldstein
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Exploring global distortions of biological macromolecules and assemblies from low-resolution structural information and elastic network theory.

Authors:  Florence Tama; Willy Wriggers; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Optimization of high throughput virtual screening by combining shape-matching and docking methods.

Authors:  Hui Sun Lee; Jiwon Choi; Irina Kufareva; Ruben Abagyan; Anton Filikov; Young Yang; Sukjoon Yoon
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Discovery of kinase inhibitors by high-throughput docking and scoring based on a transferable linear interaction energy model.

Authors:  Peter Kolb; Danzhi Huang; Fabian Dey; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Novel 2-aminopyrimidine carbamates as potent and orally active inhibitors of Lck: synthesis, SAR, and in vivo antiinflammatory activity.

Authors:  Matthew W Martin; John Newcomb; Joseph J Nunes; David C McGowan; David M Armistead; Christina Boucher; John L Buchanan; William Buckner; Lilly Chai; Daniel Elbaum; Linda F Epstein; Theodore Faust; Shaun Flynn; Paul Gallant; Anu Gore; Yan Gu; Faye Hsieh; Xin Huang; Josie H Lee; Daniela Metz; Scot Middleton; Deanna Mohn; Kurt Morgenstern; Michael J Morrison; Perry M Novak; Antonio Oliveira-dos-Santos; David Powers; Paul Rose; Stephen Schneider; Stephanie Sell; Yanyan Tudor; Susan M Turci; Andrew A Welcher; Ryan D White; Debra Zack; Huilin Zhao; Li Zhu; Xiaotian Zhu; Chiara Ghiron; Patricia Amouzegh; Monika Ermann; James Jenkins; David Johnston; Spencer Napier; Eoin Power
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Comparative virtual and experimental high-throughput screening for glycogen synthase kinase-3beta inhibitors.

Authors:  Tímea Polgár; Andrea Baki; Györgyi I Szendrei; György M Keseru
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Identification of a minimal subset of receptor conformations for improved multiple conformation docking and two-step scoring.

Authors:  Sukjoon Yoon; William J Welsh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

10.  Inhibition of p38 MAP kinase by utilizing a novel allosteric binding site.

Authors:  Christopher Pargellis; Liang Tong; Laurie Churchill; Pier F Cirillo; Thomas Gilmore; Anne G Graham; Peter M Grob; Eugene R Hickey; Neil Moss; Susan Pav; John Regan
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-04
View more
  16 in total

1.  Utilizing experimental data for reducing ensemble size in flexible-protein docking.

Authors:  Mengang Xu; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Virtual screening using a conformationally flexible target protein: models for ligand binding to p38α MAPK.

Authors:  Natalie B Vinh; Jamie S Simpson; Peter J Scammells; David K Chalmers
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Receptor-ligand molecular docking.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Camila S de Magalhães; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-12-21

Review 4.  Efficient incorporation of protein flexibility and dynamics into molecular docking simulations.

Authors:  Markus A Lill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Evaluation of several two-step scoring functions based on linear interaction energy, effective ligand size, and empirical pair potentials for prediction of protein-ligand binding geometry and free energy.

Authors:  Obaidur Rahaman; Trilce P Estrada; Douglas J Doren; Michela Taufer; Charles L Brooks; Roger S Armen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Prediction of consensus binding mode geometries for related chemical series of positive allosteric modulators of adenosine and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Leon A Sakkal; Kyle Z Rajkowski; Roger S Armen
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Flexible CDOCKER: Development and application of a pseudo-explicit structure-based docking method within CHARMM.

Authors:  Jessica K Gagnon; Sean M Law; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Novel K-Ras G12C Switch-II Covalent Binders Destabilize Ras and Accelerate Nucleotide Exchange.

Authors:  Chimno I Nnadi; Meredith L Jenkins; Daniel R Gentile; Leslie A Bateman; Daniel Zaidman; Trent E Balius; Daniel K Nomura; John E Burke; Kevan M Shokat; Nir London
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Accurate calculation of mutational effects on the thermodynamics of inhibitor binding to p38α MAP kinase: a combined computational and experimental study.

Authors:  Shun Zhu; Sue M Travis; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Energy penalties enhance flexible receptor docking in a model cavity.

Authors:  Anna S Kamenik; Isha Singh; Parnian Lak; Trent E Balius; Klaus R Liedl; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.