Literature DB >> 20160839

Bounding Sample Size Projections for the Area Under a ROC Curve.

Jeffrey D Blume1.   

Abstract

Studies of diagnostic tests are often designed with the goal of estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) because the AUC is a natural summary of a test's overall diagnostic ability. However, sample size projections dealing with AUCs are very sensitive to assumptions about the variance of the empirical AUC estimator, which dependens on two correlation parameters. While these correlation parameters can be estimated from available data, in practice it is hard to find reliable estimates before the study is conducted. Here we derive achievable bounds on the projected sample size that are free of these two correlation parameters. The lower bound is the smallest sample size that would yield the desired level of precision for some model, while the upper bound is the smallest sample size that would yield the desired level of precision for all models. These bounds are important reference points when designing a single or multi-arm study; they are the absolute minimum and maximum sample size that would ever be required. When the study design includes multiple readers or interpreters of the test, we derive bounds pertaining to the average reader AUC and the 'pooled' or overall AUC for the population of readers. These upper bounds for multireader studies are not too conservative when several readers are involved.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20160839      PMCID: PMC2631183          DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference        ISSN: 0378-3758            Impact factor:   1.111


  17 in total

1.  Sampling variability of nonparametric estimates of the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves: an update.

Authors:  J A Hanley; K O Hajian-Tilaki
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Variance-component modeling in the analysis of receiver operating characteristic index estimates.

Authors:  C A Roe; C E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski; D K McClish
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Limitations to the robustness of binormal ROC curves: effects of model misspecification and location of decision thresholds on bias, precision, size and power.

Authors:  S J Walsh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  On the statistical analysis of ROC curves.

Authors:  M L Thompson; W Zucchini
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Computing sample size for receiver operating characteristic studies.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Stratification in nonparametric ROC studies.

Authors:  S Sukhatme; C A Beam
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Authors:  B J McNeil; J A Hanley
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sample size tables for computer-aided detection studies.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Clinical Evaluation of the Optical Filter for Autofluorescence Glasses for Oral Cancer Curing Light Exposed (GOCCLES®) in the Management of Potentially Premalignant Disorders: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Carlo Lajolo; Mariateresa Tranfa; Romeo Patini; Antonino Fiorino; Teresa Musarra; Roberto Boniello; Alessandro Moro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Accuracy and interpretation time of computer-aided detection among novice and experienced breast MRI readers.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Jeffrey D Blume; Wendy B DeMartini; Nola M Hylton; Benjamin Herman; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.959

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.