Literature DB >> 20159984

Chemotherapeutic drugs inhibit ribosome biogenesis at various levels.

Kaspar Burger1, Bastian Mühl, Thomas Harasim, Michaela Rohrmoser, Anastassia Malamoussi, Mathias Orban, Markus Kellner, Anita Gruber-Eber, Elisabeth Kremmer, Michael Hölzel, Dirk Eick.   

Abstract

Drugs for cancer therapy belong to different categories of chemical substances. The cellular targets for the therapeutic efficacy are often not unambiguously identified. Here, we describe the process of ribosome biogenesis as a target of a large variety of chemotherapeutic drugs. We determined the inhibitory concentration of 36 chemotherapeutic drugs for transcription and processing of ribosomal RNA by in vivo labeling experiments. Inhibitory drug concentrations were correlated to the loss of nucleolar integrity. The synergism of drugs inhibiting ribosomal RNA synthesis at different levels was studied. Drugs inhibited ribosomal RNA synthesis either at the level of (i) rRNA transcription (e.g. oxaliplatin, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, methotrexate), (ii) early rRNA processing (e.g. camptothecin, flavopiridol, roscovitine), or (iii) late rRNA processing (e.g. 5-fluorouracil, MG-132, homoharringtonine). Blockage of rRNA transcription or early rRNA processing steps caused nucleolar disintegration, whereas blockage of late rRNA processing steps left the nucleolus intact. Flavopiridol and 5-fluorouracil showed a strong synergism for inhibition of rRNA processing. We conclude that inhibition of ribosome biogenesis by chemotherapeutic drugs potentially may contribute to the efficacy of therapeutic regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20159984      PMCID: PMC2852979          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.074211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  37 in total

1.  Regulation of HDM2 activity by the ribosomal protein L11.

Authors:  Marion A E Lohrum; Robert L Ludwig; Michael H G Kubbutat; Mary Hanlon; Karen H Vousden
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 2.  The role of dUTPase and uracil-DNA repair in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  R D Ladner
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Repression of RNA polymerase I transcription by the tumor suppressor p53.

Authors:  W Zhai; L Comai
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Defects in 18 S or 28 S rRNA processing activate the p53 pathway.

Authors:  Michael Hölzel; Mathias Orban; Julia Hochstatter; Michaela Rohrmoser; Thomas Harasim; Anastassia Malamoussi; Elisabeth Kremmer; Gernot Längst; Dirk Eick
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Ribosomal protein L23 activates p53 by inhibiting MDM2 function in response to ribosomal perturbation but not to translation inhibition.

Authors:  Mu-Shui Dai; Shelya X Zeng; Yetao Jin; Xiao-Xin Sun; Larry David; Hua Lu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies.

Authors:  Daniel B Longley; D Paul Harkin; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  A role for c-Myc in the regulation of ribosomal RNA processing.

Authors:  Isabel Schlosser; Michael Hölzel; Marlies Mürnseer; Helmut Burtscher; Ulrich H Weidle; Dirk Eick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Disruption of the nucleolus mediates stabilization of p53 in response to DNA damage and other stresses.

Authors:  Carlos P Rubbi; Jo Milner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Discovering modes of action for therapeutic compounds using a genome-wide screen of yeast heterozygotes.

Authors:  Pek Yee Lum; Christopher D Armour; Sergey B Stepaniants; Guy Cavet; Maria K Wolf; J Scott Butler; Jerald C Hinshaw; Philippe Garnier; Glenn D Prestwich; Amy Leonardson; Philip Garrett-Engele; Christopher M Rush; Martin Bard; Greg Schimmack; John W Phillips; Christopher J Roberts; Daniel D Shoemaker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Pseudouridines in and near the branch site recognition region of U2 snRNA are required for snRNP biogenesis and pre-mRNA splicing in Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  Xinliang Zhao; YiI-Tao Yu
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.942

View more
  178 in total

1.  Targeting RNA-Polymerase I in Both Chemosensitive and Chemoresistant Populations in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Robert Cornelison; Zachary C Dobbin; Ashwini A Katre; Dae Hoon Jeong; Yinfeng Zhang; Dongquan Chen; Yuliya Petrova; Danielle C Llaneza; Adam D Steg; Laura Parsons; David A Schneider; Charles N Landen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Nucleolar disruption and apoptosis are distinct neuronal responses to etoposide-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Maciej Pietrzak; Scott C Smith; Justin T Geralds; Theo Hagg; Cynthia Gomes; Michal Hetman
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 5.372

3.  A subset of platinum-containing chemotherapeutic agents kills cells by inducing ribosome biogenesis stress.

Authors:  Peter M Bruno; Yunpeng Liu; Ga Young Park; Junko Murai; Catherine E Koch; Timothy J Eisen; Justin R Pritchard; Yves Pommier; Stephen J Lippard; Michael T Hemann
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  The RP-p53-Mdm2 pathway: a new link to genetic integrity?

Authors:  Rebeca A Frum; Yanping Zhang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Alu element-containing RNAs maintain nucleolar structure and function.

Authors:  Maïwen Caudron-Herger; Teresa Pankert; Jeanette Seiler; Attila Németh; Renate Voit; Ingrid Grummt; Karsten Rippe
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  ARF Confers a Context-Dependent Response to Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Tomasz B Owczarek; Takashi Kobayashi; Ricardo Ramirez; Lijie Rong; Anna M Puzio-Kuter; Gopa Iyer; Min Yuen Teo; Francisco Sánchez-Vega; Jingqiang Wang; Nikolaus Schultz; Tian Zheng; David B Solit; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Cory Abate-Shen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Antithymidylate resistance enables transgene selection and cell survival for T cells in the presence of 5-fluorouracil and antifolates.

Authors:  D Rushworth; A Alpert; R Santana-Carrero; S Olivares; D Spencer; L J N Cooper
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Seminiferous epithelium damage after short period of busulphan treatment in adult rats and vitamin B12 efficacy in the recovery of spermatogonial germ cells.

Authors:  Sandi Regina Vasiliausha; Flávia Luciana Beltrame; Fabiane de Santi; Paulo Sérgio Cerri; Breno Henrique Caneguim; Estela Sasso-Cerri
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  A targeting modality for destruction of RNA polymerase I that possesses anticancer activity.

Authors:  Karita Peltonen; Laureen Colis; Hester Liu; Rishi Trivedi; Michael S Moubarek; Henna M Moore; Baoyan Bai; Michelle A Rudek; Charles J Bieberich; Marikki Laiho
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  mTOR inhibitors blunt the p53 response to nucleolar stress by regulating RPL11 and MDM2 levels.

Authors:  Kaveh M Goudarzi; Monica Nistér; Mikael S Lindström
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.