OBJECTIVE: Automatic tumour segmentation and volumetry is useful in cancer staging and treatment outcome assessment. This paper presents a performance benchmarking study on liver tumour segmentation for three semiautomatic algorithms: 2D region growing with knowledge-based constraints (A1), 2D voxel classification with propagational learning (A2) and Bayesian rule-based 3D region growing (A3). METHODS: CT data from 30 patients were studied, and 47 liver tumours were isolated and manually segmented by experts to obtain the reference standard. Four datasets with ten tumours were used for algorithm training and the remaining 37 tumours for testing. Three evaluation metrics, relative absolute volume difference (RAVD), volumetric overlap error (VOE) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), were computed based on computerised and reference segmentations. RESULTS: A1, A2 and A3 obtained mean/median RAVD scores of 17.93/10.53%, 17.92/9.61% and 34.74/28.75%, mean/median VOEs of 30.47/26.79%, 25.70/22.64% and 39.95/38.54%, and mean/median ASSDs of 2.05/1.41 mm, 1.57/1.15 mm and 4.12/3.41 mm, respectively. For each metric, we obtained significantly lower values of A1 and A2 than A3 (P < 0.01), suggesting that A1 and A2 outperformed A3. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the reference standard, the overall performance of A1 and A2 is promising. Further development and validation is necessary before reliable tumour segmentation and volumetry can be widely used clinically.
OBJECTIVE:Automatic tumour segmentation and volumetry is useful in cancer staging and treatment outcome assessment. This paper presents a performance benchmarking study on liver tumour segmentation for three semiautomatic algorithms: 2D region growing with knowledge-based constraints (A1), 2D voxel classification with propagational learning (A2) and Bayesian rule-based 3D region growing (A3). METHODS: CT data from 30 patients were studied, and 47 liver tumours were isolated and manually segmented by experts to obtain the reference standard. Four datasets with ten tumours were used for algorithm training and the remaining 37 tumours for testing. Three evaluation metrics, relative absolute volume difference (RAVD), volumetric overlap error (VOE) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), were computed based on computerised and reference segmentations. RESULTS: A1, A2 and A3 obtained mean/median RAVD scores of 17.93/10.53%, 17.92/9.61% and 34.74/28.75%, mean/median VOEs of 30.47/26.79%, 25.70/22.64% and 39.95/38.54%, and mean/median ASSDs of 2.05/1.41 mm, 1.57/1.15 mm and 4.12/3.41 mm, respectively. For each metric, we obtained significantly lower values of A1 and A2 than A3 (P < 0.01), suggesting that A1 and A2 outperformed A3. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the reference standard, the overall performance of A1 and A2 is promising. Further development and validation is necessary before reliable tumour segmentation and volumetry can be widely used clinically.
Authors: Samuel G Armato; Geoffrey McLennan; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Charles R Meyer; David Yankelevitz; Denise R Aberle; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber MacMahon; Anthony P Reeves; Barbara Y Croft; Laurence P Clarke Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Binsheng Zhao; Lawrence H Schwartz; Li Jiang; Jane Colville; Chaya Moskowitz; Liang Wang; Robert Leftowitz; Fan Liu; John Kalaigian Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Peter J Yim; Amit V Vora; Deepak Raghavan; Ravi Prasad; Matthew McAullife; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; John L Nosher Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: K D Hopper; C J Kasales; K D Eggli; T R TenHave; N M Belman; P S Potok; M A Van Slyke; G J Olt; P Close; A Lipton; H A Harvey; J S Hartzel Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1996 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Sebastian Keil; Florian F Behrendt; Sven Stanzel; Michael Sühling; Alexander Koch; Jhenee Bubenzer; Georg Mühlenbruch; Andreas H Mahnken; Rolf W Günther; Marco Das Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Vladimir Kuznetsov; Hwee Kuan Lee; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Maria Judit Molnár; Sandor Pongor; Birgit Eisenhaber; Frank Eisenhaber Journal: Health Inf Sci Syst Date: 2013-01-10