Literature DB >> 20157817

Liver tumour segmentation using contrast-enhanced multi-detector CT data: performance benchmarking of three semiautomated methods.

Jia-Yin Zhou1, Damon W K Wong, Feng Ding, Sudhakar K Venkatesh, Qi Tian, Ying-Yi Qi, Wei Xiong, Jimmy J Liu, Wee-Kheng Leow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Automatic tumour segmentation and volumetry is useful in cancer staging and treatment outcome assessment. This paper presents a performance benchmarking study on liver tumour segmentation for three semiautomatic algorithms: 2D region growing with knowledge-based constraints (A1), 2D voxel classification with propagational learning (A2) and Bayesian rule-based 3D region growing (A3).
METHODS: CT data from 30 patients were studied, and 47 liver tumours were isolated and manually segmented by experts to obtain the reference standard. Four datasets with ten tumours were used for algorithm training and the remaining 37 tumours for testing. Three evaluation metrics, relative absolute volume difference (RAVD), volumetric overlap error (VOE) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), were computed based on computerised and reference segmentations.
RESULTS: A1, A2 and A3 obtained mean/median RAVD scores of 17.93/10.53%, 17.92/9.61% and 34.74/28.75%, mean/median VOEs of 30.47/26.79%, 25.70/22.64% and 39.95/38.54%, and mean/median ASSDs of 2.05/1.41 mm, 1.57/1.15 mm and 4.12/3.41 mm, respectively. For each metric, we obtained significantly lower values of A1 and A2 than A3 (P < 0.01), suggesting that A1 and A2 outperformed A3.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the reference standard, the overall performance of A1 and A2 is promising. Further development and validation is necessary before reliable tumour segmentation and volumetry can be widely used clinically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20157817     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1712-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  16 in total

1.  Tumor size on computed tomography scans: is one measurement enough?

Authors:  A H Dachman; P M MacEneaney; A Adedipe; M Carlin; L P Schumm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Lung image database consortium: developing a resource for the medical imaging research community.

Authors:  Samuel G Armato; Geoffrey McLennan; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Charles R Meyer; David Yankelevitz; Denise R Aberle; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber MacMahon; Anthony P Reeves; Barbara Y Croft; Laurence P Clarke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Shape-constraint region growing for delineation of hepatic metastases on contrast-enhanced computed tomograph scans.

Authors:  Binsheng Zhao; Lawrence H Schwartz; Li Jiang; Jane Colville; Chaya Moskowitz; Liang Wang; Robert Leftowitz; Fan Liu; John Kalaigian
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Volumetric analysis of liver metastases in computed tomography with the fuzzy C-means algorithm.

Authors:  Peter J Yim; Amit V Vora; Deepak Raghavan; Ravi Prasad; Matthew McAullife; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; John L Nosher
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  A bayesian approach for liver analysis: algorithm and validation study.

Authors:  M Freiman; O Eliassaf; Y Taieb; L Joskowicz; J Sosna
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2008

6.  The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment.

Authors:  K D Hopper; C J Kasales; K D Eggli; T R TenHave; N M Belman; P S Potok; M A Van Slyke; G J Olt; P Close; A Lipton; H A Harvey; J S Hartzel
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 7.  Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends.

Authors:  F Xavier Bosch; Josepa Ribes; Mireia Díaz; Ramon Cléries
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional iterative watershed segmentation methods in hepatic tumor volumetrics.

Authors:  Shonket Ray; Rosalie Hagge; Marijo Gillen; Miguel Cerejo; Shidrokh Shakeri; Laurel Beckett; Tamara Greasby; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A new fully automatic and robust algorithm for fast segmentation of liver tissue and tumors from CT scans.

Authors:  Laurent Massoptier; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Semi-automated measurement of hyperdense, hypodense and heterogeneous hepatic metastasis on standard MDCT slices. Comparison of semi-automated and manual measurement of RECIST and WHO criteria.

Authors:  Sebastian Keil; Florian F Behrendt; Sven Stanzel; Michael Sühling; Alexander Koch; Jhenee Bubenzer; Georg Mühlenbruch; Andreas H Mahnken; Rolf W Günther; Marco Das
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  16 in total

1.  Object-based analysis of CT images for automatic detection and segmentation of hypodense liver lesions.

Authors:  Michael Schwier; Jan Hendrik Moltz; Heinz-Otto Peitgen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Survey on Liver Tumour Resection Planning System: Steps, Techniques, and Parameters.

Authors:  Omar Ibrahim Alirr; Ashrani Aizzuddin Abd Rahni
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Progress in Fully Automated Abdominal CT Interpretation.

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Liver volumetry: Is imaging reliable? Personal experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mirko D'Onofrio; Riccardo De Robertis; Emanuele Demozzi; Stefano Crosara; Stefano Canestrini; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-28

5.  Computer-aided diagnosis of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma using multi-phase abdomen CT.

Authors:  Akash Nayak; Esha Baidya Kayal; Manish Arya; Jayanth Culli; Sonal Krishan; Sumeet Agarwal; Amit Mehndiratta
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Improved segmentation of low-contrast lesions using sigmoid edge model.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Foruzan; Yen-Wei Chen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Comparison of semi-automatic volumetric VX2 hepatic tumor segmentation from cone beam CT and multi-detector CT with histology in rabbit models.

Authors:  Olivier Pellerin; Mingde Lin; Nikhil Bhagat; Roberto Ardon; Benoit Mory; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  How bioinformatics influences health informatics: usage of biomolecular sequences, expression profiles and automated microscopic image analyses for clinical needs and public health.

Authors:  Vladimir Kuznetsov; Hwee Kuan Lee; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Maria Judit Molnár; Sandor Pongor; Birgit Eisenhaber; Frank Eisenhaber
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2013-01-10

9.  An automated liver tumour segmentation from abdominal CT scans for hepatic surgical planning.

Authors:  Omar Ibrahim Alirr; Ashrani Aizzuddin Abd Rahni; Ehsan Golkar
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Accurate Tumor Segmentation via Octave Convolution Neural Network.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Jingyi Yang; Jingyang Ai; Nana Luo; Lihua An; Haixia Feng; Bo Yang; Zheng You
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.