Literature DB >> 20157747

Australian palliative care providers' perceptions and experiences of the barriers and facilitators to palliative care provision.

Claire Johnson1, Afaf Girgis, Chris Paul, David C Currow, Jon Adams, Sanchia Aranda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: People with advanced cancer who may benefit from specialised palliative care (SPC) do not necessarily access such services.
METHODS: To obtain a deeper understanding of issues affecting access to SPC, five focus groups were undertaken with nurses (35), physicians (three), allied health professionals (seven) and an academic involved in providing care.
RESULTS: Thematic analysis revealed that palliative care providers consistently view palliative care as a broad holistic approach to care benchmarked on good symptom management. Whilst participants themselves perceived SPC as aiming to maximise the quality of life of the patient and family across all domains of care, they perceived that some health professionals and community members viewed palliative care largely as symptom control and terminal care for access after all disease-modifying treatment has been exhausted. Concern was expressed that such misconceptions were an important barrier to timely SPC. Participants did not nominate a time or particular milestone in the disease process which should prompt referral and suggested that SPC be available at any time where needs are complex and/or are not being met.
CONCLUSION: Failure to properly recognise and understand the breadth of care provided within the palliative care framework may result in people with advanced cancer and their caregivers not accessing SPC services or accessing them too late to receive maximum benefit. Education may be required to promote the holistic nature of SPC services amongst health professionals and the community and to help realise the potential benefits to patients, families and health professionals resulting from timely access to SPC services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20157747     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0822-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  15 in total

1.  Physical and psychological needs of patients dying from colo-rectal cancer.

Authors:  P Maguire; S Walsh; J Jeacock; R Kingston
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 2.  How well do general practitioners deliver palliative care? A systematic review.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Mitchell
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  Is there evidence that palliative care teams alter end-of-life experiences of patients and their caregivers?

Authors:  Irene J Higginson; Ilora G Finlay; Danielle M Goodwin; Kerry Hood; Adrian G K Edwards; Alison Cook; Hannah Rose Douglas; Charles E Normand
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Development of the palliative care needs assessment tool (PC-NAT) for use by multi-disciplinary health professionals.

Authors:  A Waller; A Girgis; D Currow; C Lecathelinais
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  The relationship between available support, unmet needs and caregiver burden in patients with advanced cancer and their carers.

Authors:  Louise Sharpe; Phyllis Butow; Claire Smith; David McConnell; Stephen Clarke
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 6.  Depression in the terminally ill.

Authors:  T S Brugha
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1993 Aug 18-31

7.  Good enough death: autonomy and choice in Australian palliative care.

Authors:  Beverley McNamara
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Cancer specialists' palliative care referral practices and perceptions: results of a national survey.

Authors:  C E Johnson; A Girgis; C L Paul; D C Currow
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.762

9.  How well do medical oncologists' perceptions reflect their patients' reported physical and psychosocial problems? Data from a survey of five oncologists.

Authors:  S Newell; R W Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; A Bonaventura
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Do specialist palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  J Hearn; I J Higginson
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.762

View more
  5 in total

1.  Practices and opinions of specialized palliative care physicians regarding early palliative care in oncology.

Authors:  Anna Sorensen; Kirsten Wentlandt; Lisa W Le; Nadia Swami; Breffni Hannon; Gary Rodin; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Evolving Definitions of Palliative Care: Upstream Migration or Confusion?

Authors:  Suzanne Ryan; Joanne Wong; Ronald Chow; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-02-11

3.  Nurses' perceptions of barriers and supportive behaviors in end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Xu; Dan Luo; Jie Chen; Ji-Li Zeng; Xiao-Lin Cheng; Jin Li; Juan-Juan Pei; Fen Hu
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.113

4.  How views of oncologists and haematologists impacts palliative care referral: a systematic review.

Authors:  Naveen Salins; Arunangshu Ghoshal; Sean Hughes; Nancy Preston
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.234

5.  Developing a complex intervention to support timely engagement with palliative care for patients with advanced cancer in primary and secondary care in the UK: a study protocol.

Authors:  Julia Hackett; Hilary Bekker; Michael I Bennett; Paul Carder; Jean Gallagher; Claire Henry; Suzanne Kite; Sally Taylor; Galina Velikova; Lucy Ziegler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.