Jie Shen1, Christina Curtis, Simon Tavaré, John Tower. 1. Molecular and Computational Biology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Abstract
Conditional expression of transgenes in Drosophila was produced using the Geneswitch system, wherein feeding the drug RU486/Mifepristone activates the artificial transcription factor Geneswitch. Geneswitch was expressed using the Actin5C promoter and this was found to yield conditional, tissue-general expression of a target transgene (UAS-GFP) in both larvae and adult flies. Nervous system-specific (Elav-GS) and fat body-specific Geneswitch drivers were also characterized using UAS-GFP. Fourteen genes implicated in growth, apoptosis and senescence regulatory pathways were over-expressed in adult flies or during larval development, and assayed for effects on adult fly life span. Over-expression of a dominant p53 allele (p53-259H) in adult flies using the ubiquitous driver produced increased life span in females but not males, consistent with previous studies. Both wingless and Ras activated form transgenes were lethal when expressed in larvae, and reduced life span when expressed in adults, consistent with results from other model systems indicating that the wingless and Ras pathways can promote senescence. Over-expression of the caspase inhibitor baculovirus p35 during larval development reduced the mean life span of male and female adults, and also produced a subset of females with increased life span. These experiments suggest that baculovirus p35 and the wingless and Ras pathways can have sex-specific and developmental stage-specific effects on adult Drosophila life span, and these reagents should be useful for the further analysis of the role of these conserved pathways in aging.
Conditional expression of transgenes in Drosophila was produced using the Geneswitch system, wherein feeding the drug RU486/Mifepristone activates the artificial transcription factor Geneswitch. Geneswitch was expressed using the Actin5C promoter and this was found to yield conditional, tissue-general expression of a target transgene (UAS-GFP) in both larvae and adult flies. Nervous system-specific (Elav-GS) and fat body-specific Geneswitch drivers were also characterized using UAS-GFP. Fourteen genes implicated in growth, apoptosis and senescence regulatory pathways were over-expressed in adult flies or during larval development, and assayed for effects on adult fly life span. Over-expression of a dominant p53 allele (p53-259H) in adult flies using the ubiquitous driver produced increased life span in females but not males, consistent with previous studies. Both wingless and Ras activated form transgenes were lethal when expressed in larvae, and reduced life span when expressed in adults, consistent with results from other model systems indicating that the wingless and Ras pathways can promote senescence. Over-expression of the caspase inhibitor baculovirus p35 during larval development reduced the mean life span of male and female adults, and also produced a subset of females with increased life span. These experiments suggest that baculovirus p35 and the wingless and Ras pathways can have sex-specific and developmental stage-specific effects on adult Drosophila life span, and these reagents should be useful for the further analysis of the role of these conserved pathways in aging.
A number of stresses can cause cells to
enter a non-dividing state called cellular senescence [1]. These stresses
include repeated cell division, expression of activated oncogenes, oxidative
stress, and irradiation. The cellular senescence pathway functions as an
anti-tumor mechanism in mammals, and is regulated by the tumor-suppressor
proteins p53 and Rb. Senescence of cells during aging may contribute to
mammalian aging phenotypes by limiting the
ability of stem cell populations
to replenish tissues. Several Drosophila tissues are maintained by
dividing stem cell populations, including the gonads [2], the gut [3,4] and
the malpighian tubule (equivalent to mammalian kidney) [5], however it is
currently unknown whether alterations in these stem cell populations during
aging has an effect on Drosophila life span.Apoptosis
(programmed cell death) is also implicated in mammalian and Drosophila
aging phenotypes.Regulated
apoptosis is required for normal homeostasis in dividing tissues such as the
gut and hematopoetic system, and abnormal apoptotic events have been observed
in muscle and other tissues during mammalian aging [6]. In addition, apoptosis
is implicated in several human aging-related diseases, for example
neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease
[7]. In aging Drosophila, abnormal apoptotic events have been observed
in muscle and fat tissue [8], but the extent to which apoptosis (or cellular
senescence) might modulate Drosophila life span remains largely unknown.
Several genes that can affect apoptosis (and senescence) have been found to
affect Drosophila life span, including DPOSH, MnSOD and p53
[9-12]. In mammals hyperactive p53 can produce an accelerated-aging-like
phenotype [13], and in Drosophila a dominant-mutant p53 transgene
can inhibit insulin-like signaling and cause increased life span [14]. However,
the extent to which these effects on life span might be mediated by alterations
in apoptosis and/or cellular senescence pathways is largely unknown. The
potential importance of the cellular senescence and apoptosis pathways in
modulating life span prompted a screen of additional genes implicated in these
pathways for life span effects in the fly.Conditional
gene expression systems have several advantages for studies of aging: for
example with the Tet-on system the expression of transgenes is triggered by
feeding the flies the drug doxycycline, and with the Geneswitch system
transgene expression is triggered using the drug RU486/Mifepristone [15-17].
These conditional systems allow for transgene expression to be limited to
specific life cycle stages such as development or adulthood. Moreover, these
systems provide powerful controls for genetic background effects on life span,
since the control and gene-over-expressing animals have identical genetic
backgrounds and differ only in the presence or absence of the drug. It is
often desirable to over-express a gene in all the tissues of the fly, for
example when screening genes for possible life span effects. We have recently
reported the generation of a Geneswitch system driver (called "Act-GS-255B"),
which contains multiple inserts of a construct in which the promoter of the
cytoplasmic actin gene Actin5C is used to drive expression of the
Geneswitch transcription factor [16]. Here the Act-GS-255B driver is further
characterized using a UAS-GFP reporter, and we report that it is truly
tissue-general in both the larval and adult stages. The tissue-general driver
facilitated the screening of senescence and apoptosis regulatory genes for life
span effects.
Results
Characterization
of Geneswitch drivers in adult flies using the UAS-GFP reporter
To
facilitate the screen of apoptosis and senescence-regulatory genes for life
span effects, several Geneswitch system drivers were characterized for their
tissue-specificity of transgene activation using a UAS-GFP reporter, both in
adult flies and during larval development. The UAS-GFP reporter employed was
"UAS-ultraGFP" which contains multiple copies of a UAS-eGFP construct, and
yields particularly high levels of GFP expression [18]. Three Geneswitch
system drivers were characterized: The Act-GS-255B driver strain contains
multiple inserts of a construct in which the promoter from the cytoplasmic
actin gene Actin 5C drives Geneswitch, and is expected to yield
tissue-general expression [16]. The Elav-GS driver contains Geneswitch under
control of the Elav gene promoter and produces nervous-system-specific
expression [19]. Finally the whole-body fat-body Geneswitch driver strain
("WB-FB-GS") contains both a head fat-body driver (S1-32) and a
body-fat-body driver (S1-106) [20-22], and is expected to yield expression
in the fat-body tissue throughout the animal. The three driver strains were
crossed to the UAS-ultraGFP reporter strain to produce adult progeny containing
both the driver and reporter constructs, and the flies were cultured in the
presence and absence of drug for two weeks. GFP expression was scored in live
adult flies as well as in several dissected tissues (Figure 1). The
Act-GS-255B driver was found to yield tissue-general expression of the
UAS-ultraGFP reporter in adult flies. In whole adults, GFP expression was
observed throughout the body of both males and females, with greater expression
levels observed in females relative to males. Similarly with heads dissected
in half and bodies dissected in half, expression was observed in all tissues,
including abundant expression in nervous system, muscle (including flight
muscle), and fat-body tissue. Note that flight muscle in male has lower
expression than flight muscle in female, however inspection of the GFP-only
image for male flight muscle (inset) reveals expression throughout this
tissue. Abundant expression was also observed throughout dissected gut tissue,
ovary and testes. The expression level was greater in some regions of the gut
than others, however all regions of the gut exhibited staining, as revealed by
inspection of the GFP-only images (inset).
All tissues observed showed significant GFP expression, and therefore we
conclude that Act-GS-255B yields truly tissue-general expression in adult flies. The WB-FB-GS driver produced GFP expression in the
head-fat-body and body-fat-body tissues,
as expected, as well as in the gut and testes, and very faint expression in
ovary; there was no detectable expression in nervous, muscle, or other
tissues. Notably, the expression in adult male head fat body was much reduced
relative to female head fat body, consistent with recent characterization of
the fat body drivers using a LacZ reporter [17]. Finally, the Elav-GS driver produced abundant expression in the brain and ventral nerve cord, as expected, and there
was no detectable expression in any other tissues; for example, the muscle, gut
and gonads were clearly negative. Note the GFP-only image for the gut (inset)
shows a lack of expression. The Elav-GS driver was found to produce similar
levels of UAS-GFP reporter expression in male versus female in our experiments.
Figure 1.
Expression pattern produced by Geneswitch drivers and UAS-GFP reporter in adult flies.
The indicated GeneSwitch
drivers Act-GS-255B ("255B"), Elav-GS ("Elav") and WB-FB-GS ("FB") were
crossed to the UAS-ultraGFP reporter and adult progeny containing both
constructs were scored for GFP expression in various tissues. Control
flies were generated by crossing UAS-ultraGFP to whitestrain flies to produce progeny containing only UAS-ultraGFP. Age-synchronized
flies were cultured in the presence and absence
of the drug RU486 for two weeks prior to assay, and GFP expression was
scored in whole adult flies and dissected tissues, as indicated. Each
image is the overlay of the visible light and GFP images. Insets show
details of the regions boxed in white, GFP image only. M = male, F =
female. Pictures were taken at the magnification of 20X, 50X, 32X, 20X,
50X, and 80X, for whole fly, head in half, body in half, gut, ovary, and
testes, respectively. The white arrow indicates a region of 255B Female
flight muscle that is obscured by a fragment of cuticle.
Expression pattern produced by Geneswitch drivers and UAS-GFP reporter in adult flies.
The indicated GeneSwitch
drivers Act-GS-255B ("255B"), Elav-GS ("Elav") and WB-FB-GS ("FB") were
crossed to the UAS-ultraGFP reporter and adult progeny containing both
constructs were scored for GFP expression in various tissues. Control
flies were generated by crossing UAS-ultraGFP to whitestrain flies to produce progeny containing only UAS-ultraGFP. Age-synchronized
flies were cultured in the presence and absence
of the drug RU486 for two weeks prior to assay, and GFP expression was
scored in whole adult flies and dissected tissues, as indicated. Each
image is the overlay of the visible light and GFP images. Insets show
details of the regions boxed in white, GFP image only. M = male, F =
female. Pictures were taken at the magnification of 20X, 50X, 32X, 20X,
50X, and 80X, for whole fly, head in half, body in half, gut, ovary, and
testes, respectively. The white arrow indicates a region of 255B Female
flight muscle that is obscured by a fragment of cuticle.
Characterization
of Geneswitch drivers in larvae using the UAS-GFP reporter
The Geneswitch driver strains were also
scored for expression patterns in 3rd instar larvae and dissected
tissues (Figure 2). The Act-GS-255B driver was found to
yield tissue-general expression, including abundant expression throughout the
body of whole 3rd instar larvae, as well as in dissected brain, gut,
salivary gland, imaginal discs and fat-body tissues; all tissues observed
showed abundant GFP expression (Figure 2A). The inset for the Act-GS-255B 3rd
instar larval brain shows detail of the
GFP-only image, and indicates that expression was present throughout the brain,
with higher-level expression in a subset of cells. The WB-FB-GS driver was
found to drive abundant expression in salivary gland and anterior midgut, but
notably no expression in any other larval tissues including larval fat-body.
Finally the Elav-GS driver produced abundant expression in larval nervous
system and no detectable expression in any other larval tissues. The inset for
the Elav-GS 3rd instar larval brain shows detail of the GFP-only image, and shows that expression was present throughout the
brain, with higher-level expression in a subset of cells. Notably this subset
of cells was different from that observed above with Act-GS-255B. Each of the
three drivers was found to produce similar patterns of expression in 1st
and 2nd instar larvae as well (Figure 1B). When the Act-GS-255B
driver was induced using dilutions of RU486 drug in the culture media, it
produced a dose-response of GFP expression in 3rd instar larvae
(Figure 1D), as well as in adult flies (data not shown).
Figure 2.
Expression pattern produced by GeneSwitch drivers and UAS-GFP reporter in larvae.
The crosses are the same as
Figure 1, but larvae were cultured in the presence and absence of drug in
the food, from hatching to the indicated developmental stage. A.
Expression patterns in 3rd instar larvae and dissected tissues.
For the Elav-GS driver ("Elav") a 1:10 dilution of drug was used because of
the toxic effects of drug observed in larvae with this driver. Pictures
were taken at the magnification of 25X, 100X, 20X, 50X, 100X, 80X, for
whole larvae, brain, gut, salivary gland, imaginal discs, and fat body,
respectively. B. Expression patterns in the three larval stages. For Elav-GS
a 1:10 dilution of drug was used to avoid toxic effects. GFP pictures were
taken at the magnification of 100X, 50X, 25X, for 1st instar, 2nd
instar, and 3rd instar, respectively. C. Expression in 3rd
instar larvae using Act-GS-255B and titrations of drug. ETOH indicates the
ethanol solvent for the drug alone. Pictures were taken at the
magnification of 25X.
Expression pattern produced by GeneSwitch drivers and UAS-GFP reporter in larvae.
The crosses are the same as
Figure 1, but larvae were cultured in the presence and absence of drug in
the food, from hatching to the indicated developmental stage. A.
Expression patterns in 3rd instar larvae and dissected tissues.
For the Elav-GS driver ("Elav") a 1:10 dilution of drug was used because of
the toxic effects of drug observed in larvae with this driver. Pictures
were taken at the magnification of 25X, 100X, 20X, 50X, 100X, 80X, for
whole larvae, brain, gut, salivary gland, imaginal discs, and fat body,
respectively. B. Expression patterns in the three larval stages. For Elav-GS
a 1:10 dilution of drug was used to avoid toxic effects. GFP pictures were
taken at the magnification of 100X, 50X, 25X, for 1st instar, 2nd
instar, and 3rd instar, respectively. C. Expression in 3rd
instar larvae using Act-GS-255B and titrations of drug. ETOH indicates the
ethanol solvent for the drug alone. Pictures were taken at the
magnification of 25X.
Effect
of apoptosis and senescence-regulatory gene over-expression on life span
Fourteen apoptosis and senescence
regulatory genes were chosen for analysis based on their relevance to human
apoptosis and senescence pathways and the availability of reagents for Drosophila. Ras85D is a Drosophila homolog of the human oncogene Ras
that encodes a GTPase involved in signal transduction.Ras85D activated form contains an amino acid substitution that causes Ras
to be constitutively active [23], and Ras85D dominant negative (DN)
form contains an amino acid substitution that causes it to inhibit the
endogenous Ras protein [23,24]. Wingless is a Drosophila homolog of
the humanWnt signaling protein involved in development and tumorigenesis
[25]. Pk61C is a serine/threonine protein kinase related to humanPDK-1 and
involved in growth signaling [26]. DIAP1 is a Drosophila member of the
inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family [27]. Baculovirus p35 is a
caspase inhibitor protein also related to the IAPs. Nemo (nmo)
is the Drosophila homolog of a human protein kinase regulatory subunit
involved in NF-kappaB signaling pathway [28]. Egfr is the Drosophila
homolog of the humanepidermal growth factor receptor [29]. The Drosophilapointed (pnt) gene encodes a transcription factor homologous to
humanEts1 that is involved in the Ras signaling pathway. The DrosophilaMatrix metalloproteinase 2 gene (Mmp2) is involved in tissue
remodeling and tumor progression and is related to a family of human matrix
metalloproteinases [30]. The DrosophilaStat92E
gene encodes a homolog of the human Stat transcription factor, which is a
target of the Jak-Stat growth-regulatory pathway [31]. The Drosophilapuckered
(puc) gene encodes a phosphatase homologous to the human VH-1 family
that antagonizes JNK signaling, and heterozygous puc mutant flies have
been reported to have increased stress resistance and life span [32,33]. The DrosophilaSphingosine kinase 2 (Sk2) gene encodes
a lipid kinase involved in activation of protein kinase C-family signaling, and
the human homolog Sphk2 is implicated in regulation of apoptosis [34].
Finally the CG14544 gene encodes a predicted methyltransferase, and the Drosophilabantam (ban) gene encodes a micro-RNA that inhibits expression of
pro-apoptotic genes [35]. Each of these genes of interest was over-expressed in
adult flies or during larval development, and assayed for effects on adult fly
life span.To control for any possible effects of
the Geneswitch system and the RU486 drug itself, life span was assayed in flies
that were the progeny of Act-GS-2555B driver crossed to either Oregon-R (Or-R)
wild-type strain or to the w control strain, to produce
progeny containing only the driver. In these control flies, treatment with
drug produced small, but statistically significant reductions in life span in
both male and female adults: treatment during adulthood reduced mean life span
by -4% to -10%, while treatment in larval stages reduced adult life span by -8%
to -16% (Figure 3A, B; Figure 4A, B; Tables 2, 3). There were no significant
increases in life span in control flies treated with RU486 in any of the
replicate experiments. These data indicate that in these experiments, when the
Act-GS-255B driver is present, the RU486 can cause small but significant
reductions in adult life span, and this effect must be taken into account when
interpreting the effects of transgene over-expression. Other studies [22],
including ones from our own laboratory using the Act-GS-255B driver [36], found
no negative effects of RU486 on adult fly life span. We conclude that the small
negative effects observed here result from differences in the lot of RU486
drug, and/or small differences in effective concentrations due to specifics of
media preparation. To confirm that the Act-GS-255B driver can produce increased
life span, it was used to drive over-expression of the dominant p53
allele (p53-259H). Over-expression of p53-259H in adult flies
using the ubiquitous Act-GS-255B driver produced increased median life span in
females (+8%) but not males (-2.8%), and no life span increase when expressed
in larvae (Table 3). These results are consistent with previous studies showing
that expression of p53-259H in the adult nervous system with the Elav-GS
driver can cause increased life span in females [14], and confirms that the
Act-GS-255B driver can indeed produce increased life span when combined with an
appropriate target gene.
Figure 3.
Effect of transgene over-expression on survival of adult flies.
Apoptosis and
senescence-related genes wingless, Ras85D, and Ras85D
activated form were over-expressed during larval development or in
adults, and assayed for effects on adult life span in male and female
flies, as indicated. The life span assays were performed at 29°C. Open circles represent the no-drug control
("-"). Solid squares represent adults treated with drug ("A"). Grey
triangles represent larvae on drug ("L"). Survival curves are plotted as a
function of adult age in days. Median life span of each cohort is presented
along with p value for log rank test (in parentheses). (A, C,
E, G) male flies. (B, D, F, H) female flies. (A, B) Control
flies containing the driver and no target transgene. (C, D) Ras85D
activated form. (E, F) Ras85D wild-type. (G, H) wingless.
Figure 4.
Effect of Baculovirus p35 over-expression on survival of adult flies.
Baculovirus p35
transgenes inserted on the X chromosome, chromosome 2, and chromosome 3
were over-expressed during larval development or adult stage, as indicated.
The life span assays were performed at 25°C. Open circles represent the no-drug control ("-"). Solid squares
represent adults treated with drug ("A"). Grey triangles represent larvae
on drug ("L"). Survival curves are plotted as a function of adult age in
days. Median life span of each cohort is presented along with p
value for log rank tests (in parentheses). (A, C, E, G) male
flies. (B, D, F, H) female flies. (A,B) Control flies
containing the driver and no target transgene. (C, D) Baculovirus
p35 transgene on X chromosome. (E, F) Baculovirus p35 transgene
on second chromosome. (G, H) Baculovirus p35 transgene on
third chromosome.
Table 3.
Life span data for baculovirus p35 experiments, with means, standard
deviations, medians, percent change in mean and median, and log rank p
value.
CrossMxF
RU486
Genotype
Sex
N
Meana
Median
%Change in Mean
%Change in Median
Log Rank p Value
Exp1 Life span assay of
three UAS-p35 lines and UAS-p53.259H with GS255B driver at 25C
7-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+; +
M
120
84.6±14.25
90
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+; +
M
119
83.08±10.94
86
-1.8
-4.44
0.014
L
w/Y; 255B/+; +
M
123
78.44±22.48
86
-7.28
-4.44
0.244
-
w/+; 255B/+; +
F
116
92.02±9.64
94
---------
---------
---------
A
w/+; 255B/+; +
F
121
94.69±8.61
94
2.9
0
0.009
L
w/+; 255B/+; +
F
124
91.97±15.74
94
-0.05
0
0.047
1-9
-
p35,w*/Y; 255B/+; +
M
120
68.93±12.49
70
---------
---------
---------
A
p35,w*/Y; 255B/+; +
M
123
68.62±11.76
70
-0.45
0
0.681
L
p35,w*/Y; 255B/+; +
M
98
33.1±22.91
26
-51.98
-62.86
0
-
p35,w*/+; 255B/+; +
F
122
83.28±15.13
86
---------
---------
---------
A
p35,w*/+; 255B/+; +
F
130
77.15±20.92
82
-7.36
-4.65
0.11
L
p35,w*/+; 255B/+; +
F
125
57.52±35.8
70
-30.93
-18.6
0.001
10-1
-
w/Y; 255B/p35; +
M
117
54.48±13
54
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/p35; +
M
121
57.26±8.45
58
5.1
7.41
0.583
L
w/Y; 255B/p35; +
M
110
34.25±19.5
34
-37.13
-37.04
5.60E-10
-
w/w*; 255B/p35; +
F
120
64.05±14.63
66
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w*; 255B/p35; +
F
126
60.79±16.68
66
-5.09
0
0.188
L
w/w*; 255B/p35; +
F
123
49.37±32.2
54
-22.92
-18.18
0.436
11-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+; p35/+
M
133
86.03±12.51
90
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+; p35/+
M
122
81.31±13.87
84
-5.49
-6.67
8.92E-06
L
w/Y; 255B/+; p35/+
M
56
46.18±24.21
44
-46.32
-51.11
0
-
w/w*; 255B/+; p35/+
F
126
87.54±10.04
90
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w*; 255B/+; p35/+
F
127
82.19±9.91
82
-6.11
-8.89
8.60E-05
L
w/w*; 255B/+; p35/+
F
126
64.63±29.62
75
-26.17
-16.67
4.67E-07
29-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;p53.259H/+
M
118
71.54±13.86
72
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;p53.259H/+
M
125
68.90±10.41
70
-3.70
-2.78
0.002
L
w/Y; 255B/+;p53.259H/+
M
119
67.73±16.92
70
-5.33
-2.78
0.069
-
w; 255B/+; p53.259H/+
F
119
75.40±8.50
76
---------
---------
---------
A
w; 255B/+; p53.259H/+
F
119
80.66±10.98
82
6.98
7.89
4.05E-08
L
w; 255B/+; p53.259H/+
F
125
70.24±22.02
76
-6.84
0
0.202
Exp2 Life span assay of
three UAS-p35 lines with head FB driver, whole body FB driver and GS255A
driver at 25C
3-7
-
+/Y; S32/+; +
M
75
59.23±14.11
64
---------
---------
---------
A
+/Y; S32/+; +
M
63
55.21±15.74
60
-6.79
-6.25
0.013
-
w/+; S32/+; +
F
111
59.91±18.96
60
---------
---------
---------
A
w/+; S32/+; +
F
115
63.77±17.71
66
6.45
10
0.263
3-9
-
p35,w*/Y; S32/+; +
M
122
62.69±10.62
64
---------
---------
---------
A
p35,w*/Y; S32/+; +
M
105
58.3±13.45
60
-6.99
-6.25
0.022
-
p35,w*/w; S32/+; +
F
112
59.95±25
72
---------
---------
---------
A
p35,w*/w; S32/+; +
F
108
59±24.86
68
-1.58
-5.56
0.974
3-10
-
w*/Y; S32/p35; +
M
123
45.19±7.61
46
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/Y; S32/p35; +
M
120
41.52±6.84
42
-8.12
-8.7
1.96E-04
-
w*/w; S32/p35; +
F
121
61.62±8.71
62
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/w; S32/p35; +
F
105
63.28±10.6
66
2.69
6.45
0.036
3-11
-
w*/Y; S32/+; p35/+
M
125
62.67±12.41
64
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/Y; S32/+; p35/+
M
125
60.78±14.07
62
-3.03
-3.13
0.174
-
w*/w; S32/+; p35/+
F
109
68.44±17.09
74
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/w; S32/+; p35/+
F
113
70.52±18.12
76
3.04
2.7
0.043
4-7
-
+/Y; S106 S32/+; +
M
116
54.12±9.89
56
---------
---------
---------
A
+/Y; S106 S32/+; +
M
118
52.68±9.77
52
-2.67
-7.14
0.208
-
w/+; S106 S32/+; +
F
110
58.82±14.95
62
---------
---------
---------
A
w/+; S106 S32/+; +
F
120
58.07±16.45
63
-1.28
1.61
0.569
4-9
-
p35,w*/Y; S106 S32/+; +
M
121
47.21±8.48
46
---------
---------
---------
A
p35,w*/Y; S106 S32/+; +
M
110
47.67±10.28
48
0.99
4.35
0.263
-
p35,w*/w; S106 S32/+; +
F
119
55.18±22.95
66
---------
---------
---------
A
p35,w*/w; S106 S32/+; +
F
126
47.79±24.9
62
-13.38
-6.06
0.01
4-10
-
w*/Y; S106 S32/p35; +
M
125
33.39±4.44
34
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/Y; S106 S32/p35; +
M
125
32.3±6.16
32
-3.26
-5.88
0.475
-
w*/w; S106 S32/p35; +
F
121
49.55±8.14
50
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/w; S106 S32/p35; +
F
121
50.84±8.85
50
2.6
0
0.107
4-11
-
w*/Y; S106 S32/+; p35/+
M
125
47.15±6.81
48
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/Y; S106 S32/+; p35/+
M
117
48.6±8.42
48
3.07
0
0.072
-
w*/w; S106 S32/+; p35/+
F
125
56.81±13.02
60
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/w; S106 S32/+; p35/+
F
116
60.69±11.7
64
6.83
6.67
0.004
2-7
-
+/Y; 255A/+; +
M
114
66.04±8.95
67
---------
---------
---------
A
+/Y; 255A/+; +
M
117
58.97±15.36
62
-10.69
-7.46
1.48E-05
-
w/+; 255A/+; +
F
114
72.65±13.95
78
---------
---------
---------
A
w/+; 255A/+; +
F
116
75.02±13.19
78
3.26
0
0.064
2-9
-
p35,w*/Y; 255A/+; +
M
111
65.98±14.65
66
---------
---------
---------
A
p35,w*/Y; 255A/+; +
M
115
59.82±13.31
60
-9.34
-9.09
3.78E-05
-
p35,w*/w; 255A/+; +
F
113
58.95±20.26
64
---------
---------
---------
A
p35,w*/w; 255A/+; +
F
117
69.21±17.4
72
17.4
12.5
1.32E-06
2-10
-
w*/Y;255A/p35; +
M
113
48.98±9.74
48
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/Y;255A/p35; +
M
125
47.66±7.19
48
-2.69
0
0.03
-
w*/w; 255A/p35; +
F
115
60.57±16.71
66
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/w; 255A/p35; +
F
118
62±17.79
70
2.35
6.06
0.052
2-11
-
w*/Y; 255A/+; p35/+
M
115
63.66±11.4
64
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/Y; 255A/+; p35/+
M
114
64.92±9.41
64
1.98
0
0.776
-
w*/w; 255A/+; p35/+
F
120
67.05±11.58
70
---------
---------
---------
A
w*/w; 255A/+; p35/+
F
120
68.75±9.08
70
2.54
0
0.41
Exp3 Life span assay of
two UAS-p35 lines with whole body FB driver at 29C
7-4
-
w/Y; S106 S32/+; +
M
124
49.15±12.5
54
---------
---------
---------
L
w/Y; S106 S32/+; +
M
121
49.11±10.75
52
-0.08
-3.7
0.655
-
w/+; S106 S32/+; +
F
121
51.95±10.82
54
---------
---------
---------
L
w/+; S106 S32/+; +
F
118
55.29±10.06
60
6.42
11.11
0.029
8-4
-
w/Y; S106 S32/+; +
M
121
47.16±10.27
48
---------
---------
---------
L
w/Y; S106 S32/+; +
M
118
42.85±12.89
44
-9.14
-8.33
0.002
-
w/w; S106 S32/+; +
F
124
50.48±11.91
56
---------
---------
---------
L
w/w; S106 S32/+; +
F
125
51.63±8.47
54
2.27
-3.57
0.196
10-4
-
w/Y; S106 S32/p35; +
M
121
50.43±6.73
52
---------
---------
---------
L
w/Y; S106 S32/p35; +
M
121
46.5±8.28
48
-7.8
-7.69
4.23E-05
-
w*/w; S106 S32/p35; +
F
120
50.4±12.84
56
---------
---------
---------
L
w*/w; S106 S32/p35; +
F
129
48.57±8.9
50
-3.62
-10.71
1.45E-05
11-4
-
w/Y; S106 S32/+; p35/+
M
126
44.03±6.5
46
---------
---------
---------
L
w/Y; S106 S32/+; p35/+
M
122
41.92±10.42
46
-4.8
0
0.208
-
w*/w; S106 S32/+; p35/+
F
122
58.03±6.59
60
---------
---------
---------
L
w*/w; S106 S32/+; p35/+
F
124
54.81±8.05
56
-5.56
-6.67
8.84E-07
Exp4 Life span assay of
two UAS-p35 lines with Elav driver at 29C
7-5
-
yw/Y; +/+; Elav/+
M
131
53.92±7.15
54
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y; +/+; Elav/+
M
129
52.33±8.14
53
-2.95
-1.85
0.083
L
yw/Y; +/+; Elav/+
M
59
35.85±10.58
38
-33.51
-29.63
0
-
yw/+; +/+; Elav/+
F
127
58.15±7.22
60
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/+; +/+; Elav/+
F
129
57.11±5.19
58
-1.79
-3.33
0.013
L
yw/+; +/+; Elav/+
F
120
43.46±7.94
44
-25.26
-26.67
0
8-5
-
yw/Y; +/+; Elav/+
M
126
44.08±8.36
44.5
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y; +/+; Elav/+
M
120
43.32±8.76
45
-1.73
1.12
0.186
L
yw/Y; +/+; Elav/+
M
102
26.24±8.51
26
-40.48
-41.57
0
-
yw/w; +/+; Elav/+
F
124
46.88±9.92
50
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/w; +/+; Elav/+
F
124
48.13±7.5
49.5
2.67
-1
0.406
L
yw/w; +/+; Elav/+
F
114
34.82±10.34
36
-25.73
-28
0
10-5
-
yw/Y; p35/+; Elav/+
M
125
42.34±6.38
44
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y; p35/+; Elav/+
M
122
43.34±10.34
46
2.38
4.55
0.007
L
yw/Y; p35/+; Elav/+
M
9
20.89±10.3
26
-50.66
-40.91
0
-
yw/w*; p35/+; Elav/+
F
121
49±10.63
52
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/w*; p35/+; Elav/+
F
126
50.16±6.4
51
2.36
-1.92
0.014
L
yw/w*; p35/+; Elav/+
F
9
28.22±10.27
32
-42.4
-38.46
1.60E-14
11-5
-
yw/Y; +; Elav/p35
M
120
51.24±10.46
54
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y; +; Elav/p35
M
121
48.62±10.1
52
-5.12
-3.7
1.22E-06
L
yw/Y; +; Elav/p35
M
1
10±NA
10
-80.48
-81.48
5.60E-10
-
yw/w*; +; Elav/p35
F
118
56.77±3.89
58
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/w*; +; Elav/p35
F
131
52.67±5.08
54
-7.22
-6.9
3.51E-13
L
yw/w*; +; Elav/p35
F
0
NA
NA
---------
---------
---------
Exp5 Life span assay of
two UAS-p35 lines with GS255B driver at 25C
8-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+; +
M
121
62.33±18.12
68
---------
---------
---------
L
w/Y; 255B/+; +
M
119
62.57±16.22
68
0.39
0
0.478
L1-10
w/Y; 255B/+; +
M
120
66.02±19.38
72
5.91
5.88
7.82E-04
-
w/w; 255B/+; +
F
123
75.95±9.37
78
---------
---------
---------
L
w/w; 255B/+; +
F
124
69.02±12.88
74
-9.13
-5.13
7.69E-07
L1-10
w/w; 255B/+; +
F
124
78.18±9.17
80
2.93
2.56
7.84E-04
10-1
-
w/Y; 255B/p35; +
M
111
56.32±25.51
66
---------
---------
---------
L
w/Y; 255B/p35; +
M
4
16±21.6
7
-71.59
-89.39
6.47E-05
L1-10
w/Y; 255B/p35; +
M
117
58.56±17.95
62
3.98
-6.06
0.528
-
w/w*; 255B/p35; +
F
119
68.47±13.26
72
---------
---------
---------
L
w/w*; 255B/p35; +
F
30
27.47±16.58
24
-59.89
-66.67
0
L1-10
w/w*; 255B/p35; +
F
124
64.5±16.45
70
-5.8
-2.78
0.757
11-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+; p35/+
M
117
66.15±9.97
68
---------
---------
---------
L
w/Y; 255B/+; p35/+
M
1
14±NA
14
-78.84
-79.41
3.38E-14
L1-10
w/Y; 255B/+; p35/+
M
123
64.98±15.73
70
-1.78
2.94
0.099
-
w/w*; 255B/+; p35/+
F
123
74.41±5.98
76
---------
---------
---------
L
w/w*; 255B/+; p35/+
F
0
NA
NA
---------
---------
---------
L1-10
w/w*; 255B/+; p35/+
F
123
74.37±11.95
78
-0.04
2.63
0.003
Exp6 Life span assay of
two UAS-p35 lines with Elav driver at 25C
8-5
-
yw/Y; +/+; Elav/+
M
108
61.69±17.95
67
---------
---------
---------
L1-10
yw/Y; +/+; Elav/+
M
115
54.17±15.55
58
-12.18
-13.43
1.80E-08
-
yw/w; +/+; Elav/+
F
120
57.42±14.79
64
---------
---------
---------
L1-10
yw/w; +/+; Elav/+
F
117
56.41±10.82
58
-1.75
-9.38
0.004
10-5
-
yw/Y; p35/+; Elav/+
M
121
46.6±7.2
46
---------
---------
---------
L1-10
yw/Y; p35/+; Elav/+
M
115
37.81±9.05
38
-18.86
-17.39
7.06E-14
-
yw/w*; p35/+; Elav/+
F
123
50.63±15.32
54
---------
---------
---------
L1-10
yw/w*; p35/+; Elav/+
F
121
49.19±12.16
50
-2.85
-7.41
0.035
11-5
-
yw/Y; +; Elav/p35
M
120
54.32±13.04
56
---------
---------
---------
L1-10
yw/Y; +; Elav/p35
M
111
52.31±10.98
52
-3.7
-7.14
0.037
-
yw/w*; +; Elav/p35
F
123
52.7±13.97
54
---------
---------
---------
L1-10
yw/w*; +; Elav/p35
F
118
56.63±10.73
58
7.45
7.41
0.091
Effect of transgene over-expression on survival of adult flies.
Apoptosis and
senescence-related genes wingless, Ras85D, and Ras85D
activated form were over-expressed during larval development or in
adults, and assayed for effects on adult life span in male and female
flies, as indicated. The life span assays were performed at 29°C. Open circles represent the no-drug control
("-"). Solid squares represent adults treated with drug ("A"). Grey
triangles represent larvae on drug ("L"). Survival curves are plotted as a
function of adult age in days. Median life span of each cohort is presented
along with p value for log rank test (in parentheses). (A, C,
E, G) male flies. (B, D, F, H) female flies. (A, B) Control
flies containing the driver and no target transgene. (C, D) Ras85D
activated form. (E, F) Ras85D wild-type. (G, H) wingless.
Effect of Baculovirus p35 over-expression on survival of adult flies.
Baculovirus p35
transgenes inserted on the X chromosome, chromosome 2, and chromosome 3
were over-expressed during larval development or adult stage, as indicated.
The life span assays were performed at 25°C. Open circles represent the no-drug control ("-"). Solid squares
represent adults treated with drug ("A"). Grey triangles represent larvae
on drug ("L"). Survival curves are plotted as a function of adult age in
days. Median life span of each cohort is presented along with p
value for log rank tests (in parentheses). (A, C, E, G) male
flies. (B, D, F, H) female flies. (A,B) Control flies
containing the driver and no target transgene. (C, D) Baculovirus
p35 transgene on X chromosome. (E, F) Baculovirus p35 transgene
on second chromosome. (G, H) Baculovirus p35 transgene on
third chromosome.Most
of the genes tested by over-expression with the ubiquitous Act-GS-255B driver
did not affect life span to an extent greater than the small changes observed
with the control flies. However, Ras activated form transgene was
lethal when expressed in larvae, and reduced both male and female life span by
-80% when expressed in adults (Figure 3C, D; Table 2). Over-expression of
wild-type Ras or a Ras dominant-negative allele was not lethal to
larvae, and produced only small decreases (-4% to -12%) in both male and female
adult life span (Figure 2 E, F; Table 2), thereby in the range of negative
effects observed with control flies. Over-expression of the wingless
gene was found to be lethal to male and female larvae, using two independent wingless
transgenes (Table 2). Over-expression of wingless in adult flies
produced significant reductions in both male and female life span: ~-42% with
one wingless transgene (Figure 3 G, H) and ~-10% with the other
transgene (Table 2).
Table 2.
Life span data of apoptosis-related
gene experiments, with means, standard deviations, medians, percent change in mean and
median, and log rank p value.
CrossMxF
RU486
Genotype
Sex
N
Meana
Median
%Change in Mean
%Change in Median
Log Rank p Value
Exp1 Life
span assay using GS255B driver at 29C
8-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
115
51.53±8.66
53
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
120
47.29±11.06
50
-8.23
-5.66
0.001
L
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
40
47.28±12.15
51
-8.26
-3.77
0.002
-
w/w; 255B/+;
+
F
128
54.18±8.26
56
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w; 255B/+;
+
F
120
51.74±3.89
52
-4.5
-7.14
4.38E-09
L
w/w; 255B/+;
+
F
120
48.18±8.38
50
-11.07
-10.71
6.30E-11
12-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
Ras act/+
M
122
51.11±11.58
55.5
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
Ras act/+
M
128
9.45±3.42
10
-81.5
-81.98
0
L
w/Y; 255B/+;
Ras act/+
M
0
NA
NA
---------
---------
---------
-
w/w*;
255B/+; Ras act/+
F
123
54.19±13.26
59
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w*;
255B/+; Ras act/+
F
123
12.11±2.8
12
-77.64
-79.66
0
L
w/w*;
255B/+; Ras act/+
F
0
NA
NA
---------
---------
---------
13-1
-
w/Y; 255B/Ras
WT;+
M
124
46.65±9.01
47
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/Ras
WT;+
M
122
42.3±9.13
42
-9.32
-10.64
1.43E-04
L
w/Y; 255B/Ras
WT;+
M
47
42.06±10.37
43
-9.84
-8.51
0.004
-
w/w*;
255B/Ras WT;+
F
126
51.31±8.64
52
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w*;
255B/Ras WT;+
F
126
46.84±5.17
46
-8.71
-11.54
8.15E-12
L
w/w*;
255B/Ras WT;+
F
118
43.66±8.85
46
-14.91
-11.54
0
1-14
-
Ras DN, w/Y;
255B/+; +
M
127
47.89±9.88
50
---------
---------
---------
A
Ras DN, w/Y;
255B/+; +
M
123
43.64±6.87
44
-8.87
-12
5.78E-08
L
Ras DN, w/Y;
255B/+; +
M
79
44.76±12.49
48
-6.54
-4
0.14
-
Ras DN, w/w;
255B/+; +
F
121
51.65±14.25
57
---------
---------
---------
A
Ras DN, w/w;
255B/+; +
F
125
51.82±8.3
53
0.32
-7.02
5.09E-04
L
Ras DN, w/w;
255B/+; +
F
125
45.39±13.16
49
-12.12
-14.04
1.98E-09
15-1
-
w/Y; 255B/wga;
+
M
130
52.56±8.37
55
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/wga;
+
M
122
29.83±9.32
32
-43.25
-41.82
0
L
w/Y; 255B/wga;
+
M
0
NA
NA
---------
---------
---------
-
w/w*; 255B/wga;
+
F
122
55.78±12.01
60
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w*; 255B/wga;
+
F
125
33.61±10.55
34
-39.75
-43.33
0
L
w/w*; 255B/wga;
+
F
0
NA
NA
---------
---------
---------
16-1
-
w/Y;
255B/+;wgb/+
M
124
52.31±8.81
56
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y;
255B/+;wgb/+
M
131
45.02±8.04
47
-13.94
-16.07
0
L
w/Y;
255B/+;wgb/+
M
0
NA
NA
---------
---------
---------
-
w/w*;
255B/+;wgb/+
F
120
51.29±10.38
53
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w*;
255B/+;wgb/+
F
123
47.55±7.23
49
-7.29
-7.55
3.24E-10
L
w/w*;
255B/+;wgb/+
F
0
NA
NA
---------
---------
---------
17-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
M
122
47.9±9.67
47
---------
---------
---------
L
w/Y; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
M
21
42.81±13.89
47
-10.63
0
0.224
-
w/yw; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
F
127
49.82±16.97
56
---------
---------
---------
L
w/yw; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
F
121
50.24±11.55
52
0.84
-7.14
8.57E-04
18-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
Pk61Cb/+
M
126
57.29±8.23
59
---------
---------
---------
L
w/Y; 255B/+;
Pk61Cb/+
M
24
48.08±10.99
51
-16.06
-13.56
4.11E-12
-
w; 255B/+;
Pk61Cb/+
F
124
54.51±9.89
56.5
---------
---------
---------
L
w; 255B/+;
Pk61Cb/+
F
121
45.28±13.38
51
-16.93
-9.73
1.79E-14
19-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
M
120
56.23±8.68
59
---------
---------
---------
L
w/Y; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
M
93
47.68±17.07
53
-15.22
-10.17
0.002
-
w/w*; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
F
120
54.64±11.2
57.5
---------
---------
---------
L
w/w*; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
F
117
46.74±14.76
51
-14.45
-11.3
1.97E-07
7-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
124
52.97±7.68
56
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
124
49.73±4.6
50
-6.11
-10.71
6.19E-13
L
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
22
44.5±16.86
52
-15.99
-7.14
2.94E-05
-
w/+; 255B/+;
+
F
118
58.39±5.25
59
---------
---------
---------
A
w/+; 255B/+;
+
F
122
52.66±4.09
52
-9.81
-11.86
0
L
w/+; 255B/+;
+
F
122
50.45±9.78
53.5
-13.6
-9.32
1.18E-13
Ex 2 Life
span assay using GS255B driver at 25C
7-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
94
73.17±15.64
78
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
93
69.97±12.33
72
-4.38
-7.69
5.22E-04
-
w/+; 255B/+;
+
F
92
87.2±18.44
92
---------
---------
---------
A
w/+; 255B/+;
+
F
91
91.93±7.76
94
5.43
2.17
0.940
20-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
nmo/+
M
95
66.74±16.11
68
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
nmo/+
M
90
64.66±14.3
66
-3.12
-2.94
0.102
-
w/yw; 255B/+;
nmo/+
F
97
67.59±28.66
74
---------
---------
---------
A
w/yw; 255B/+;
nmo/+
F
95
68.79±30.17
80
1.78
8.11
0.878
15-1
-
w/Y; 255B/wga;
+
M
96
72.88±10.31
74
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/wga;
+
M
92
53.14±18.01
56
-27.08
-24.32
0
-
w/w*; 255B/wga;
+
F
97
78.89±19.38
84
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w*; 255B/wga;
+
F
97
53.72±22.13
52
-31.9
-38.1
0
17-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
M
91
64.11±13.4
64
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
M
94
62.85±13.08
66
-1.96
3.13
0.555
-
w/yw; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
F
98
70.73±26.23
78
---------
---------
---------
A
w/yw; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
F
94
79.81±23.77
90
12.83
15.38
0.149
21-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
Egfr/+
M
89
62.38±11.19
66
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
Egfr/+
M
97
62.06±9.18
64
-0.51
-3.03
0.166
-
w/y w*;
255B/+; Egfr/+
F
95
65.71±21.16
68
---------
---------
---------
A
w/y w*;
255B/+; Egfr/+
F
100
63.52±17.9
65
-3.33
-4.41
0.076
19-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
M
102
76.57±13.04
78
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
M
94
73.4±9.53
74
-4.13
-5.13
0.002
-
w/w*; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
F
98
78.9±18.26
84
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w*; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
F
95
81.39±19.17
88
3.16
4.76
0.011
22-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
pnt/+
M
96
62.6±9.74
64
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
pnt/+
M
94
59.15±10.7
60
-5.52
-6.25
0.077
-
w/yw; 255B/+;
pnt/+
F
92
74.32±27.19
85
---------
---------
---------
A
w/yw; 255B/+;
pnt/+
F
95
79.77±20.03
88
7.34
3.53
0.402
Exp3 Life
span assay using GS255B driver at 25C
7-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
100
81.01±15.38
86
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
92
80.46±10.42
82
-0.68
-4.65
0.039
-
w/+; 255B/+;
+
F
85
92.49±11.86
94
---------
---------
---------
A
w/+; 255B/+;
+
F
99
92.05±13.07
94
-0.48
0
0.571
13-1
-
w/Y; 255B/Ras
WT;+
M
95
75.87±12.26
78
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/Ras
WT;+
M
98
67.92±14.13
70
-10.48
-10.26
1.62E-06
-
w/w*;
255B/Ras WT;+
F
96
83.43±12.26
86
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w*;
255B/Ras WT;+
F
98
79.59±10.58
82
-4.6
-4.65
0.001
23-1
-
w/Y;
255B/Mmp2; +
M
96
69.77±13.03
70
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y;
255B/Mmp2; +
M
96
68.81±10.06
70
-1.37
0
0.117
-
w/yw;
255B/Mmp2; +
F
98
85.94±18.45
91
---------
---------
---------
A
w/yw;
255B/Mmp2; +
F
101
84.85±18.67
90
-1.27
-1.1
0.109
24-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
Stat/+
M
96
64.31±10.06
65
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
Stat/+
M
99
65.08±13.33
68
1.19
4.62
0.325
-
w/yw; 255B/+;
Stat/+
F
99
70.48±21.48
78
---------
---------
---------
A
w/yw; 255B/+;
Stat/+
F
96
62.29±24.99
74
-11.62
-5.13
0.076
25-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
puc/+
M
97
70.78±14.98
70
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
puc/+
M
96
68.96±13.62
68
-2.58
-2.86
0.269
-
w/w*; 255B/+;
puc/+
F
84
94.07±15.00
98
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w*; 255B/+;
puc/+
F
97
98.1±7.86
100
4.29
2.04
0.135
Exp4 Life
span assay using GS255B driver at 25C
7-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
92
73.76±18.31
78
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
86
71.84±10.87
74
-2.61
-5.13
1.43E-04
-
w/+; 255B/+;
+
F
86
86.28±15.46
90
---------
---------
---------
A
w/+; 255B/+;
+
F
101
86.18±10.02
88
-0.12
-2.22
0.035
26-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
Sk2/+
M
90
67.22±16.97
72
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
Sk2/+
M
95
69.85±12.26
72
3.91
0
0.953
-
w/yw; 255B/+;
Sk2/+
F
101
73.29±24.6
84
---------
---------
---------
A
w/yw; 255B/+;
Sk2/+
F
106
78.08±19.61
86
6.53
2.38
0.84
27-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
ban/+
M
98
66.59±21.91
70
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
ban/+
M
95
61.56±18.15
62
-7.56
-11.43
0.003
-
w/yw; 255B/+;
ban/+
F
94
76.36±28.78
88
---------
---------
---------
A
w/yw; 255B/+;
ban/+
F
96
81.56±18.03
88
6.81
0
0.023
28-1
-
w/Y;
255B/+;CG14544/+
M
91
75.03±12.8
76
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y;
255B/+;CG14544/+
M
97
77.01±9.82
78
2.64
2.63
0.844
-
w/w;
255B/+;CG14544/+
F
101
70.99±26.75
82
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w;
255B/+;CG14544/+
F
96
69.33±20.57
79
-2.33
-3.66
2.28E-05
Exp5 Life
span assay using GS255B driver, and MHC GS driver at 25C
7-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
98
75.06±11.65
79
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
97
73.96±12.27
78
-1.47
-1.27
0.161
-
w/+; 255B/+;
+
F
100
87.88±7.74
88
---------
---------
---------
A
w/+; 255B/+;
+
F
101
85.33±12.78
88
-2.91
0
0.014
8-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
99
66.55±11.82
68
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
+
M
97
69.84±10.57
72
4.94
5.88
0.14
-
w/w; 255B/+;
+
F
100
79.6±14.08
84
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w; 255B/+;
+
F
97
81.69±3.82
82
2.63
-2.38
0.005
17-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
M
99
64.87±12.41
64
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
M
98
62.16±12.33
64
-4.17
0
0.113
-
w/yw; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
F
98
81.96±13.91
86
---------
---------
---------
A
w/yw; 255B/+;
Pk61Ca/+
F
99
80.46±11.15
82
-1.82
-4.65
0.001
18-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
Pk61Cb/+
M
100
71.2±9.32
74
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
Pk61Cb/+
M
101
73.33±8.19
74
2.99
0
0.135
-
w; 255B/+;
Pk61Cb/+
F
98
80.27±12.63
82
---------
---------
---------
A
w; 255B/+;
Pk61Cb/+
F
100
82.02±4.89
82
2.19
0
0.399
19-1
-
w/Y; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
M
101
72.97±11.13
76
---------
---------
---------
A
w/Y; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
M
101
71.15±11.37
74
-2.5
-2.63
0.425
-
w/w*; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
F
98
83.02±7.52
84
---------
---------
---------
A
w/w*; 255B/+;
DIAP1/+
F
106
79.47±12.78
82
-4.27
-2.38
0.011
7-6
-
yw/Y;+/CyO;
MHC/+
M
96
71.31±13.18
76
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y;+/CyO;
MHC/+
M
98
58.92±12.84
60
-17.38
-21.05
0
-
yw/+;+/CyO;
MHC/+
F
96
78.04±15.76
84
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/+;+/CyO;
MHC/+
F
114
52.84±13.75
58
-32.29
-30.95
0
8-6
-
yw/Y;+/CyO;
MHC/+
M
99
56.42±16.69
60
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y;+/CyO;
MHC/+
M
92
43.26±15
48
-23.33
-20
1.61E-12
-
yw/w;+/CyO;
MHC/+
F
93
60.73±18.82
68
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/w;+/CyO;
MHC/+
F
99
45.21±13.63
50
-25.55
-26.47
2.22E-16
17-6
-
yw/Y;+/CyO;
MHC/Pk61Ca
M
100
54.32±14.66
58
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y;+/CyO;
MHC/Pk61Ca
M
101
52.46±12.42
56
-3.43
-3.45
0.004
-
yw;+/CyO;
MHC/Pk61Ca
F
100
61.3±19.84
65
---------
---------
---------
A
yw;+/CyO;
MHC/Pk61Ca
F
99
39.37±14.22
36
-35.77
-44.62
0
18-6
-
yw/Y;+/CyO;
MHC/Pk61Cb
M
96
56.44±18.89
62
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y;+/CyO;
MHC/Pk61Cb
M
108
53.56±10.21
56
-5.11
-9.68
1.75E-07
-
yw/w;+/CyO;
MHC/Pk61Cb
F
96
55.25±21.21
56
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/w;+/CyO;
MHC/Pk61Cb
F
90
39.42±12.45
38
-28.65
-32.14
1.40E-11
19-6
-
yw/Y;+/CyO;
MHC/DIAP1
M
98
66.71±12.27
68
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y;+/CyO;
MHC/DIAP1
M
98
54.92±10.4
56
-17.68
-17.65
6.66E-15
-
yw/w*;+/CyO;MHC/DIAP1
F
108
64.89±18.19
71
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/w*;+/CyO;MHC/DIAP1
F
104
57.04±14.85
58
-12.1
-18.31
6.72E-08
7-6
-
yw/Y;+/Sp;
MHC/+
M
99
68.67±13.38
74
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y;+/Sp;
MHC/+
M
98
61.76±12.62
64
-10.07
-13.51
5.34E-08
-
yw/+;+/Sp;
MHC/+
F
94
73.66±13.99
78
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/+;+/Sp;
MHC/+
F
102
59.98±8.45
62
-18.57
-20.51
0
8-6
-
yw/Y;+/Sp;
MHC/+
M
96
61.6±14.81
66
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y;+/Sp;
MHC/+
M
94
54.55±15.5
56
-11.45
-15.15
2.47E-06
-
yw/w;+/Sp;
MHC/+
F
93
58.41±17.34
62
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/w;+/Sp;
MHC/+
F
102
47.59±12.97
52
-18.53
-16.13
2.70E-14
17-6
-
yw/Y;+/Sp;
MHC/Pk61Ca
M
95
49.31±12.75
54
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y;+/Sp;
MHC/Pk61Ca
M
100
45.14±11.03
48
-8.45
-11.11
1.95E-04
-
yw;+/Sp;
MHC/Pk61Ca
F
99
42.99±20.17
40
---------
---------
---------
A
yw;+/Sp;
MHC/Pk61Ca
F
100
35.78±16.13
30
-16.77
-25
0.003
18-6
-
yw/Y;+/Sp;
MHC/Pk61Cb
M
100
56.36±12.56
60
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y;+/Sp;
MHC/Pk61Cb
M
98
51.06±9.77
52
-9.4
-13.33
2.13E-06
-
yw/w;+/Sp;
MHC/Pk61Cb
F
97
56.6±16.25
60
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/w;+/Sp;
MHC/Pk61Cb
F
94
41.79±11.81
42
-26.17
-30
1.67E-15
19-6
-
yw/Y;+/Sp;
MHC/DIAP1
M
99
61.21±10.04
62
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/Y;+/Sp;
MHC/DIAP1
M
97
55.51±9.17
58
-9.32
-6.45
5.02E-08
-
yw/w*;+/Sp;
MHC/DIAP1
F
103
71.13±17.02
78
---------
---------
---------
A
yw/w*;+/Sp;
MHC/DIAP1
F
101
62.3±13.23
66
-12.41
-15.38
6.66E-16
Finally,
the tissue-general Act-GS-255B driver was used to over-express three different
transgenes encoding the caspase inhibitor Baculovirus p35, during larval
development and in adult flies (Figure 4; Table 3). Over-expression of Baculovirusp35 in adult flies using the tissue-general Act-GS-255B driver produced
only small decreases in life span that were within the range observed with
control flies, suggesting there were no significant effects in adults. In
contrast, when Baculovirus p35 was over-expressed during larval
development using the tissue-general driver, it reduced the mean life span of
male and female adults by -20% to -50%. Interestingly, over-expression of each
of the three independent Baculovirus p35 transgenes during larval development
produced an unusual biphasic-shaped survival curve in adult females (Figure 4
D, F, H), suggesting the presence of a subset of adult female flies with unchanged
or even increased life span. A Gompertz-Makeham
model was found to give the best fit to the life span data for females in which Baculovirus p35 was over-expressed during larval development (Figure 5;
Table 4). This analysis revealed that the decrease in mean life span was due
to increased age-independent mortality. When the age-independent mortality was
removed and the data re-plotted, it revealed a subset of female flies with
unchanged (Figure 5 B, F) or increased life span (Figure 5D).
Figure 5.
Mortality rate analysis of female larvae with and without Baculovirus p35 transgene expression.
Open circles represent the
no-drug control ("-"). Solid squares represent larvae cultured with drug
("L"). (A, B) Baculovirus p35 transgene on X chromosome. (C,
D) Baculovirusp35 transgeneon second chromosome. (E, F) Baculovirus
p35 transgene on third chromosome. (A, C, E) Plots of
natural-log mortality rate vs. age in days. (B, D, F) The data
were fitted to the Gompertz-Makeham model, which best described the
mortality rate. The age-independent mortality was removed and the survival
curves were re-drawn using only the Gompertz components. Mortality rate
analysis showed that age-independent mortality was significantly higher for
female larvae on drug versus control for all three Baculovirus p35
lines (Table 4).
Table 4.
Parameters for Gompertz-Makeham model and likelihood ratio test results.
Parameters
L
-
chi2
df
p Value
chi2
df
p Value
Females
one parameter compared at
each time
p35 (X)
Both a and b are constrained
a
5.39 x 10-9
3.96 x 10-7
1.789
1
0.181
b
3.89 x 10-1
3.00 x 10-1
1.516
1
0.218
c
2.08 x 10-2
1.63 x 10-3
59.967
1
<0.001
57.983
1
<0.001
p35 (2)
b is constrained
a
7.71 x 10-6
2.10 x 10-4
5.234
1
0.022
50.203
1
<0.001
b
2.41 x 10-1
1.92 x 10-1
1.700
1
0.192
c
2.52 x 10-2
1.37 x 10-3
50.610
1
<0.001
50.154
1
<0.001
p35 (3)
Both a and b are constrained
a
3.31 x 10-6
3.00 x 10-6
0.003
1
0.958
b
2.50 x 10-1
2.46 x 10-1
0.009
1
0.923
c
1.36 x 10-2
1.80 x 10-4
46.090
1
<0.001
66.787
<0.001
Mortality rate analysis of female larvae with and without Baculovirus p35 transgene expression.
Open circles represent the
no-drug control ("-"). Solid squares represent larvae cultured with drug
("L"). (A, B) Baculovirus p35 transgene on X chromosome. (C,
D) Baculovirusp35 transgeneon second chromosome. (E, F) Baculovirus
p35 transgene on third chromosome. (A, C, E) Plots of
natural-log mortality rate vs. age in days. (B, D, F) The data
were fitted to the Gompertz-Makeham model, which best described the
mortality rate. The age-independent mortality was removed and the survival
curves were re-drawn using only the Gompertz components. Mortality rate
analysis showed that age-independent mortality was significantly higher for
female larvae on drug versus control for all three Baculovirus p35
lines (Table 4).Two independent Baculovirus p35
transgenes were also over-expressed in adult flies using the head-fat-body
driver S1-32, and the whole-body fat-body driver (S1-32
plus S1-106), and during larval development using the whole-body
fat-body driver, however no consistent effects on life span were observed
(Table 3).The
nervous system-specific Elav-GS driver was also used to over-express two baculovirus
p35 transgenes. In adults the Elav-GS driver itself had little to no
effect on life span, and over-expression of baculovirus p35 in adults
using Elav-GS had no consistent effects on life span (Table 3). In contrast,
when drug was administered to larvae, the Elav-GS driver itself was associated
with significant decreases in life span in both males (~-30% to -40%) and
females (~-25%), and significantly reduced the number of male adults, and no
effects of the baculovirus p35 transgenes on life span could be
identified in this background (Table 3). In an attempt to reduce this
background toxicity and allow assay of baculovirus p35 transgenes with
the Elav-GS driver in larvae, a 1:10 dilution of drug was used. Under these
conditions the life span reductions caused by drug in males and females were
smaller (~-2% to -12%), and the number of males obtained was approximately
normal, however no increases in life span were observed upon over-expression of baculovirus p35 (Table 3).The
muscle-specific MHC-GS driver was used to drive over-expression of several
transgenes in adult flies, however the MHC-GS driver itself was found to cause
a significant RU486-dependent decrease in life span in both males and females
(~-20% to -30%), and none of the target transgenes tested produced a
significant life span increase in this background (Table 3).Starting StocksLife span data of apoptosis-related
gene experiments, with means, standard deviations, medians, percent change in mean and
median, and log rank p value.Life span data for baculovirus p35 experiments, with means, standard
deviations, medians, percent change in mean and median, and log rank p
value.Parameters for Gompertz-Makeham model and likelihood ratio test results.
Discussion
The
tissue and temporal specificity of transgene expression can have significant
effects on Drosophila life span, and therefore the ability meaningfully
to interpret results depends upon careful characterization of the expression
patterns produced by the system chosen to drive transgene expression [17,37].
Here the Geneswitch system driver Act-GS-255B was found to yield tissue-general
expression of target transgenes in both larvae and adults, including modulation
of expression by titrating the concentration of drug in the food. Some
sex-dependent effects on expression were observed with the Geneswitch drivers.
For example, Act-GS-255B produced tissue-general expression in both males and
females, however females consistently exhibited higher levels of expression
than males. Poirier et al. have recently reported that the Geneswitch driver S1-106
(head fat body) is active in adult females but not males [17], and we found a
similar result. Poirier et al. also reported that the Elav-GS (nervous system)
driver had a female bias, but in our experiments the Elav-GS driver supported
similar levels of UAS-GFP expression in males and females. It was
particularly striking that while the S1-106 and S1-32
drivers produced abundant target gene expression in adult fat body, they did
not support expression in the larval fat body.For the Elav-GS driver, previous studies
have reported pan-neuronal expression in larvae using a UAS-eGFP reporter [19],
nervous system-specific expression in adults using a UAS-eGFP reporter [16],
and expression in a subset of neurons in brain and ventral nerve cord in adults
using a UAS-LacZ reporter [17]. Here, using the UAS-ultraGFP reporter, Elav-GS
was found to produce pan-neuronal staining (i.e., expression in all nervous
tissue), plus higher-level expression in a subset of neurons, in both larvae
and adults, whereas no expression was observed in any tissues other than
nervous system in either larvae or adults. In contrast, Poirier et al. reported
that the Elav-GS driver produced staining in the digestive system (gut) when it
was tested with the UAS-LacZ reporter, and that this signal in gut was not
induced by drug [17]. One possible explanation for this difference in results
is that the endogenous Drosophilaβ-galactosidase is
expressed in subregions of the gut [38], and this could have resulted in a
background signal when staining for transgenic LacZ activity. Alternatively,
the expression pattern produced by the Elav-GS driver might be affected by
culture conditions or genetic background differences.When
the Act-GS-255B ubiquitous driver was used to drive expression of the p53-259H
transgene in adult flies, it produced life span extension in females,
consistent with previous results using the Elav-GS driver [9], and therefore
demonstrating that the Act-GS-255B driver can produce increased life span when
combined with an appropriate target gene. Of the fourteen candidate genes
tested by over-expression, only a subset caused significant and reproducible effects
on life span: wingless and Ras activated form caused negative
effects, while baculovirus p35 produced both positive and negative
effects depending upon sex and developmental stage for over-expression. Care
must be taken when interpreting negative effects on life span, since life span
might be decreased due to a novel pathology unrelated to the normal mechanisms
modulating life span. However, that said, it is interesting that these
particular genes/pathways were identified from among the set of genes tested.Over-expression
of wingless using the tissue-general Act-GS-255B driver was lethal to
male and female larvae, and when expressed in adult flies wingless
dramatically decreased both male and female life span. In Drosophila, wingless
signaling promotes maintenance of the gut stem cells [39,40] and somatic stem
cells in the ovary [41]. Interestingly, the wingless homolog Wnt and the
Wnt signaling pathway have been implicated in modulating aging-related cellular
phenotypes in mammals [42]: Wnt signaling is implicated in tissue homeostasis
and the maintenance of adult stem cell populations in younger mammals, while
conversely Wnt signaling is implicated in promoting senescence of muscle stem
cells in aging mammals [43] Moreover, the Klotho gene appears to
function by inhibiting Wnt signaling, and Klotho mutation produces an
accelerated aging-like phenotype in mice [44], consistent with a pro-aging
effect of the Wnt pathway. Drosophila stem cell populations show
defects in replicative homeostasis during aging in the gut [45,46] and gonads
[47-50], however it is currently unknown to what extent alterations in stem
cell function might limit adult Drosophila life span. It will be of
interest to determine if wingless over-expression reduces adult fly life
span by disrupting the function of one or more stem cell populations, and to
further explore the role of wingless signaling in the maintenance of
stem cell populations during Drosophila aging.Over-expression
of Ras activated form during Drosophila larval development was
lethal to males and females, and when expressed in adult flies it dramatically
decreased both male and female life span. Ras signaling has been found to
shorten life span and promote cellular senescence in yeast and mammals [51-56],
whereas in contrast Ras signaling is reported to promote longevity in
long-lived C. elegans Daf-2 insulin-like receptor mutants [57]. It will
be of interest in the future to test in what tissue Ras activated form
acts to decrease adult fly life span and to determine if this might result from
an induction of cellular senescence.Over-expression
of the caspase inhibitor baculovirus p35 in adult flies using the
tissue-general Act-GS-255B driver had little to no effect on life span, using
three independent baculovirus p35 transgenes. In addition,
over-expression of the caspase inhibitor DIAP1 in adults had no
consistent effects on life span. While caution must be exercised in
interpreting a negative result, it would tend to suggest that adult fly life
span is not limited by a canonical caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway.
Relevant to this idea, the apoptotic events in aging rat skeletal muscle are
reported to be relatively caspase-independent [6]. When baculovirus p35
was expressed during larval development using the tissue-general Act-GS-255B
driver, it caused reduced mean life span in the resultant male and female adult
flies, consistent with the requirement for regulated apoptosis in normal fly
development. However, the female adults that resulted from tissue-general baculovirus
p35 over-expression during development exhibited an unusual bi-phasic
survival curve that included a subset of adult females with increased life
span. This bi-phasic curve and subset of long-lived females was not observed
with nervous-system expression of baculovirus p35 in larvae using the
Elav-GS driver, suggesting that nervous-tissue may not be the critical tissue;
however, these experiments were confounded by toxic effect of the Elav-GS
driver itself in drug-treated larvae. It will be of interest in the future to
determine what might be the mechanism by which baculovirus p35
over-expression in larvae produces a subset of females with increased life
span, and if it might result from the inhibition of apoptosis in some critical
tissue during female development.
Methods
Drosophila strains.
All the target transgenes
for over-expression (Table 1) were obtained from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center. The ubiquitous Geneswitch driver lines Act-GS-255B and
Act-GS-255A contain multiple copies of a P element construct in which
expression of the Geneswitch cDNA is under the control of the tissue-general Actin5C
promoter [16]. The UAS-ultraGFP strain contain multiple copies of a UAS-eGFP
construct, and its construction and characterization have been recently
described [18]. The Geneswitch system drivers Elav-GS, MHC-GS, S1-32
and S1-106 were generously provided by T. Osterwalder and R. Davis
[19,20].
Drosophila culture.
Drosophila
culture and life span assays were performed as described previously [16].
GeneSwitch virgins were used in the crosses with males of other lines, with the
exception of strains in which the target transgene for over-expression was on
the X chromosome. Life span assays consisted of ~25 flies per vial, and a total
5 vials for each cohort. For survival assays performed at 25oC,
flies were transferred to new vials ever other day. For survival assays
preformed at 29oC flies were transferred to new vials every other
day during the first 30-40 days, and then every day for the remainder of the
life span. RU486 (Mifepristone, Sigma) was dissolved in ethanol (100%) to make
a stock solution of 3.2mg/ml. For adult feeding, 50ul RU486 stock solution was
added to the surface of each vial to produce a final concentration of
~160ug/ml; 50ul ethanol was added to the control vials. For larval feeding,
0.5ml of 3.2mg/ml RU486 stock solution (or the indicated diluted concentration)
was added to the surface of each bottle to produce a final concentration of
~160ug/ml (or indicated diluted concentration); 0.5ml ethanol was added to
control bottles.GeneSwitch driver characterization
Adult
flies were cultured in vials in the presence and absence of drug for two weeks
prior to dissection. Adult male and female flies, head in half, body in half,
midgut and hindgut, ovary and testes, were photographed. Larvae at 1st
instar, 2nd instar and 3rd instar, as well as 3rd
instar dissected tissues (brain, midgut and hindgut, salivary gland, imaginal
discs, and fat body) were also photographed. The Leica MZ FLIII fluorescence
stereomicroscope together with the SPOT software were used for photographs: The
GFP pictures were taken under the fluorescent light with exposure time 4 sec
and a gain of 2.Statistical analysis.
Mean, standard deviation,
median, percent change in mean, percent change in median, and log rank p
value were calculated using R 2.6.2 [58]. Analysis of mortality rate was
performed with the WinModest statistical package [59]. In the
Gompertz-Makeham model, the increaseof mortality (μ)
with age (x) is expressed as: μ= ae+c,
where the constant a is the initial mortalityrate, b
is the rate of exponential increase in mortality, and c is the
age-independent mortality. The age specific mortality rate (μ)
was calculated using WinModest by binning the days over which deaths
were counted (since fly deaths were recorded every other day) such that μ
= (-ln(Nδ / N )) / δ(or P
= Nδ / N
and μ = -1/δ ln(P
)), where Nis the number of flies alive at day x
and δ is the bin size [2].
Parameters (a, b, c) were also calculated based on a likelihood ratio
test. The full model (ae+c) was plotted, and the
Gompertz-only component (ae) was used to build the
decomposed survival curves, using μ: μ= ae, P= e-μ.
For the decomposed survival curves, any value below 0.5% survival was
considered to be the final data point.
Authors: Jie Zheng; Scott W Edelman; Grace Tharmarajah; David W Walker; Scott D Pletcher; Laurent Seroude Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-08-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Louise Nicholson; Gunisha K Singh; Thomas Osterwalder; Gregg W Roman; Ronald L Davis; Haig Keshishian Journal: Genetics Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: John Tower; Gary Landis; Rebecca Gao; Albert Luan; Jonathan Lee; Yuanyue Sun Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Morris Waskar; Gary N Landis; Jie Shen; Christina Curtis; Kevin Tozer; Diana Abdueva; Dmitriy Skvortsov; Simon Tavaré; John Tower Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2009-10-27 Impact factor: 5.682
Authors: Ryuichi Yamada; Sonali A Deshpande; Erin S Keebaugh; Margaux R Ehrlich; Alina Soto Obando; William W Ja Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 6.053