Literature DB >> 20157451

Artificial neural network, genetic algorithm, and logistic regression applications for predicting renal colic in emergency settings.

Cenker Eken1, Ugur Bilge, Mutlu Kartal, Oktay Eray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Logistic regression is the most common statistical model for processing multivariate data in the medical literature. Artificial intelligence models like an artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA) may also be useful to interpret medical data. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to perform artificial intelligence models on a medical data sheet and compare to logistic regression.
METHODS: ANN, GA, and logistic regression analysis were carried out on a data sheet of a previously published article regarding patients presenting to an emergency department with flank pain suspicious for renal colic.
RESULTS: The study population was composed of 227 patients: 176 patients had a diagnosis of urinary stone, while 51 ultimately had no calculus. The GA found two decision rules in predicting urinary stones. Rule 1 consisted of being male, pain not spreading to back, and no fever. In rule 2, pelvicaliceal dilatation on bedside ultrasonography replaced no fever. ANN, GA rule 1, GA rule 2, and logistic regression had a sensitivity of 94.9, 67.6, 56.8, and 95.5%, a specificity of 78.4, 76.47, 86.3, and 47.1%, a positive likelihood ratio of 4.4, 2.9, 4.1, and 1.8, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.06, 0.42, 0.5, and 0.09, respectively. The area under the curve was found to be 0.867, 0.720, 0.715, and 0.713 for all applications, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Data mining techniques such as ANN and GA can be used for predicting renal colic in emergency settings and to constitute clinical decision rules. They may be an alternative to conventional multivariate analysis applications used in biostatistics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial neural network; Emergency department; Genetic algorithm; Logistic regression; Renal colic

Year:  2009        PMID: 20157451      PMCID: PMC2700221          DOI: 10.1007/s12245-009-0103-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Emerg Med        ISSN: 1865-1372


  14 in total

1.  Prediction of emergency department visits for respiratory symptoms using an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Haim Bibi; Amir Nutman; David Shoseyov; Mendel Shalom; Ronit Peled; Shmuel Kivity; Jacob Nutman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve.

Authors:  A L HODGKIN; A F HUXLEY
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1952-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Prediction of community-acquired pneumonia using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Paul S Heckerling; Ben S Gerber; Thomas G Tape; Robert S Wigton
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Prediction of upper urinary tract calculi using an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Monthira Tanthanuch; Sawit Tanthanuch
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2004-05

5.  Prospective validation of a current algorithm including bedside US performed by emergency physicians for patients with acute flank pain suspected for renal colic.

Authors:  M Kartal; O Eray; T Erdogru; S Yilmaz
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. 1943.

Authors:  W S McCulloch; W Pitts
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Prediction of lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy using an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Vassilis Poulakis; Philipp Dahm; Ulrich Witzsch; Rachelle de Vries; Jochem Remplik; Eduard Becht
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Artificial neural network models for prediction of acute coronary syndromes using clinical data from the time of presentation.

Authors:  Robert F Harrison; R Lee Kennedy
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Prediction of spontaneous ureteral calculous passage by an artificial neural network.

Authors:  J M Cummings; J A Boullier; S D Izenberg; D M Kitchens; R V Kothandapani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Artificial neural network in predicting craniocervical junction injury: an alternative approach to trauma patients.

Authors:  Frat Bektaş; Cenker Eken; Secgin Soyuncu; Isa Kilicaslan; Yildiray Cete
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.799

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prediction of surgery times and scheduling of operation theaters in ophthalmology department.

Authors:  S Prasanna Devi; K Suryaprakasa Rao; S Sai Sangeetha
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence (AI) in urology-Current use and future directions: An iTRUE study.

Authors:  Milap Shah; Nithesh Naik; Bhaskar K Somani; B M Zeeshan Hameed
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-05-27

3.  Machine learning versus traditional methods for the development of risk stratification scores: a case study using original Canadian Syncope Risk Score data.

Authors:  Lars Grant; Pil Joo; Marie-Joe Nemnom; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 5.472

4.  Prediction of Chronic Lower Back Pain Using the Hierarchical Neural Network: Comparison with Logistic Regression-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Yutaka Owari; Nobuyuki Miyatake
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 5.  The Ascent of Artificial Intelligence in Endourology: a Systematic Review Over the Last 2 Decades.

Authors:  B M Zeeshan Hameed; Milap Shah; Nithesh Naik; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Hadis Karimi; Patrick Rice; Peter Kronenberg; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Comparison of logistic regression and artificial neural network in low back pain prediction: second national health survey.

Authors:  M Parsaeian; K Mohammad; M Mahmoudi; H Zeraati
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Leveraging Machine Learning Techniques and Engineering of Multi-Nature Features for National Daily Regional Ambulance Demand Prediction.

Authors:  Adrian Xi Lin; Andrew Fu Wah Ho; Kang Hao Cheong; Zengxiang Li; Wentong Cai; Marcel Lucas Chee; Yih Yng Ng; Xiaokui Xiao; Marcus Eng Hock Ong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Model based on GA and DNN for prediction of mRNA-Smad7 expression regulated by miRNAs in breast cancer.

Authors:  Edgar Manzanarez-Ozuna; Dora-Luz Flores; Everardo Gutiérrez-López; David Cervantes; Patricia Juárez
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2018-12-29       Impact factor: 2.432

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.