Literature DB >> 16627832

Prospective validation of a current algorithm including bedside US performed by emergency physicians for patients with acute flank pain suspected for renal colic.

M Kartal1, O Eray, T Erdogru, S Yilmaz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to validate an algorithm recommended by current literature for the patients with acute flank pain and evaluate the validity of bedside ultrasonography (US) performed by emergency physicians (EP) as a part of this algorithm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective validation study was carried out over a 5 month period in a tertiary care hospital adult emergency department (ED) with annual attendance of 55,000. Adult patients presenting to the ED with unilateral acute flank pain during the study period were enrolled into the study consecutively. Oral consent was obtained after the protocol was briefly explained to the patient and before the administration of analgesia. A protocol form was recorded for each patient enrolled into the study, and patients were followed up under the guidance of a previously designated algorithm in the ED. Data were analysed with SPSS software. The chi2 test was used to compare the dichotomised data of patients, diagnosed with and without stones, and to select the significant parameters to be used in the logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of the 227 patients enrolled, 176 were proven to have urinary tract stones. There were 122 patients discharged from ED without further investigation except urinalysis and bedside US. Of these 122 directly discharged patients, 99 had a urinary stone, and the others did not have a life threatening disorder. Four of the 227 patients were admitted to the hospital. The remaining 51 patients did not have stones detected, and their pain subsided. Having a previous history of stones, radiation of pain to the groin, accompanying nausea, and detection of pelvicalyceal dilatation using bedside US performed by the EPs were found to be the most significant parameters in determining urinary stones in logistic regression analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of these parameters were: previous history of stones 59% and 66%, radiating pain to the groin 68% and 49%, nausea 71% and 51%, and detection of pelvicalyceal dilatation by bedside US 81% and 37%.
CONCLUSION: Bedside US performed by EPs could be used safely in the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain as a part of a clinical algorithm. Previous history of urinary stones, radiation of pain to the groin, accompanying nausea. and detection of pelvicalyceal dilatation are major parameters and symptoms of urinary stone disease, and could be used in the algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627832      PMCID: PMC2564078          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2005.028589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  12 in total

1.  Ultrasound training for emergency physicians--a prospective study.

Authors:  D P Mandavia; J Aragona; L Chan; D Chan; S O Henderson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Ultrasonography by emergency physicians in patients with suspected ureteral colic.

Authors:  C L Rosen; D F Brown; M J Sagarin; Y Chang; C J McCabe; R E Wolfe
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.484

3.  Hematuria associated with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  S R Pomper; M A Fiorillo; C W Anderson; A Kopatsis
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Sep

4.  Accuracy of emergency department bedside ultrasonography.

Authors:  J L Rowland; M Kuhn; R L Bonnin; M J Davey; S L Langlois
Journal:  Emerg Med (Fremantle)       Date:  2001-09

5.  Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison.

Authors:  D H Sheafor; B S Hertzberg; K S Freed; B A Carroll; M T Keogan; E K Paulson; D M DeLong; R C Nelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Emergency department ultrasound scanning for abdominal aortic aneurysm: accessible, accurate, and advantageous.

Authors:  M Kuhn; R L Bonnin; M J Davey; J L Rowland; S L Langlois
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Usefulness of history-taking, physical examination and diagnostic scoring in acute renal colic.

Authors:  M Eskelinen; J Ikonen; P Lipponen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Renal ultrasound.

Authors:  Vicki E Noble; David F M Brown
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Bedside emergency department ultrasonography plus radiography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder vs intravenous pyelography in the evaluation of suspected ureteral colic.

Authors:  S O Henderson; R J Hoffner; J L Aragona; D E Groth; V I Esekogwu; D Chan
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  The evaluation of suspected renal colic: ultrasound scan versus excretory urography.

Authors:  D Sinclair; S Wilson; A Toi; L Greenspan
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  17 in total

1.  Investigations for recognizing urinary stone.

Authors:  Gayathri Varma; Nandu Nair; Abiya Salim; Y M Fazil Marickar
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-10-14

Review 2.  Clinician-performed abdominal sonography.

Authors:  E Dickman; M O Tessaro; A C Arroyo; L E Haines; J P Marshall
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 3.  Ultrasound Use in Urinary Stones: Adapting Old Technology for a Modern-Day Disease.

Authors:  David T Tzou; Manint Usawachintachit; Kazumi Taguchi; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  My patient has abdominal and flank pain: Identifying renal causes.

Authors:  Christopher Cox; Scott MacDonald; Ryan Henneberry; Paul R Atkinson
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-08-17

5.  Ultrasonography for ureteral stone detection in patients with or without caliceal dilatation.

Authors:  Toru Kameda; Fukiko Kawai; Nobuyuki Taniguchi; Ikuo Mori; Masako Ono; Noriko Tsukahara; Yasuyuki Kobori; Hidetoshi Yoshida; Kazuko Wagai; Atsuko Numao
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Can ureteral stones cause pain without causing hydronephrosis?

Authors:  Yan Song; Natalia Hernandez; Michael S Gee; Vicki E Noble; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Comparison of conventional radiography combined with ultrasonography versus nonenhanced helical computed tomography in evaluation of patients with renal colic.

Authors:  Sinan Ekici; Orhun Sinanoglu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-03-14

8.  Artificial neural network, genetic algorithm, and logistic regression applications for predicting renal colic in emergency settings.

Authors:  Cenker Eken; Ugur Bilge; Mutlu Kartal; Oktay Eray
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-06-03

9.  STONE PLUS: Evaluation of Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Renal Colic, Using a Clinical Prediction Tool Combined With Point-of-Care Limited Ultrasonography.

Authors:  Brock Daniels; Cary P Gross; Annette Molinaro; Dinesh Singh; Seth Luty; Richelle Jessey; Christopher L Moore
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  The renal resistive index as a predictor of acute hydronephrosis in patients with renal colic.

Authors:  E M S Piazzese; G I Mazzeo; S Galipò; F Fiumara; C Canfora; L G Angiò
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2012-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.