Literature DB >> 20155585

Concept of assessing nanoparticle hazards considering nanoparticle dosemetric and chemical/biological response metrics.

Erik K Rushton1, Jingkun Jiang, Stephen S Leonard, Shirley Eberly, Vincent Castranova, Pratim Biswas, Alison Elder, Xianglu Han, Robert Gelein, Jacob Finkelstein, Günter Oberdörster.   

Abstract

Engineered nanoparticles (NP) are being developed and incorporated in a number of commercial products, raising the potential of human exposure during manufacture, use, and disposal. Although data concerning the potential toxicity of some NP have been reported, validated simple assays are lacking for predicting their in vivo toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate new response metrics based on chemical and biological activity of NP for screening assays that can be used to predict NP toxicity in vivo. Two cell-free and two cell-based assays were evaluated for their power in predicting in vivo toxicity of eight distinct particle types with widely differing physicochemical characteristics. The cell-free systems comprised fluorescence- and electron spin resonance-based assays of oxidant activity. The cell-based systems also used electron spin resonance (ESR) as well as luciferase reporter activity to rank the different particle types in comparison to benchmark particles of low and high activity. In vivo experiments evaluated acute pulmonary inflammatory responses in rats. Endpoints in all assays were related to oxidative stress and responses were expressed per unit NP surface area to compare the results of different assays. Results indicated that NP are capable of producing reactive species, which in biological systems lead to oxidative stress. Copper NP had the greatest activity in all assays, while TiO(2) and gold NP generally were the least reactive. Differences in the ranking of NP activity among the assays were found when comparisons were based on measured responses. However, expressing the chemical (cell-free) and biological (cells; in vivo) activity per unit particle surface area showed that all in vitro assays correlated significantly with in vivo results, with the cellular assays correlating the best. Data from this study indicate that it is possible to predict acute in vivo inflammatory potential of NP with cell-free and cellular assays by using NP surface area-based dose and response metrics, but that a cellular component is required to achieve a higher degree of predictive power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20155585      PMCID: PMC3884809          DOI: 10.1080/15287390903489422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  31 in total

1.  Increased generation of hydrogen peroxide possibly from mitochondrial respiratory chain after UVB irradiation of murine fibroblasts.

Authors:  H Masaki; H Sakurai
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.563

Review 2.  Epidemiological evidence on health effects of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Angela Ibald-Mulli; H-Erich Wichmann; Wolfgang Kreyling; Annette Peters
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2002

Review 3.  Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel.

Authors:  Andre Nel; Tian Xia; Lutz Mädler; Ning Li
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Nanotechnology: the next big thing, or much ado about nothing?

Authors:  Andrew D Maynard
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2006-10-14

5.  Size-dependent proinflammatory effects of ultrafine polystyrene particles: a role for surface area and oxidative stress in the enhanced activity of ultrafines.

Authors:  D M Brown; M R Wilson; W MacNee; V Stone; K Donaldson
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Combined cupric- and cuprous-binding peptides are effective in preventing IL-8 release from endothelial cells and redox reactions.

Authors:  Leonard T Rael; Nagaraja K R Rao; Gregory W Thomas; Raphael Bar-Or; C Gerald Curtis; David Bar-Or
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Detection of picomole levels of hydroperoxides using a fluorescent dichlorofluorescein assay.

Authors:  R Cathcart; E Schwiers; B N Ames
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1983-10-01       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  The role of nitric oxide in the particulate matter (PM2.5)-induced NFkappaB activation in lung epithelial cells.

Authors:  Hae Yun Nam; Byung Hyune Choi; Joo Yong Lee; Seok Geon Lee; Young Hoon Kim; Kweon Haeng Lee; Hyoung Kyu Yoon; Jeong Sup Song; Hyung Jung Kim; Young Lim
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2004-03-14       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 9.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The potential risks of nanomaterials: a review carried out for ECETOC.

Authors:  Paul J A Borm; David Robbins; Stephan Haubold; Thomas Kuhlbusch; Heinz Fissan; Ken Donaldson; Roel Schins; Vicki Stone; Wolfgang Kreyling; Jurgen Lademann; Jean Krutmann; David Warheit; Eva Oberdorster
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 9.400

View more
  69 in total

1.  Formation of hydroxyl radical from San Joaquin Valley particles extracted in a cell-free surrogate lung fluid.

Authors:  H Shen; C Anastasio
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.133

Review 2.  The new toxicology of sophisticated materials: nanotoxicology and beyond.

Authors:  Andrew D Maynard; David B Warheit; Martin A Philbert
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Development of risk-based nanomaterial groups for occupational exposure control.

Authors:  E D Kuempel; V Castranova; C L Geraci; P A Schulte
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 4.  No time to lose--high throughput screening to assess nanomaterial safety.

Authors:  R Damoiseaux; S George; M Li; S Pokhrel; Z Ji; B France; T Xia; E Suarez; R Rallo; L Mädler; Y Cohen; E M V Hoek; A Nel
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 7.790

5.  Validation of an LDH assay for assessing nanoparticle toxicity.

Authors:  Xianglu Han; Robert Gelein; Nancy Corson; Pamela Wade-Mercer; Jingkun Jiang; Pratim Biswas; Jacob N Finkelstein; Alison Elder; Günter Oberdörster
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 6.  Mitochondrial Redox Dysfunction and Environmental Exposures.

Authors:  Samuel W Caito; Michael Aschner
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 7.  Creative use of analytical techniques and high-throughput technology to facilitate safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Xiang Wang; Tian Xia
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.142

8.  A quantitative framework to group nanoscale and microscale particles by hazard potency to derive occupational exposure limits: Proof of concept evaluation.

Authors:  Nathan M Drew; Eileen D Kuempel; Ying Pei; Feng Yang
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Cell-based assays that predict in vivo neurotoxicity of urban ambient nano-sized particulate matter.

Authors:  Hongqiao Zhang; Amin Haghani; Amirhosein H Mousavi; Mafalda Cacciottolo; Carla D'Agostino; Nikoo Safi; Mohammad H Sowlat; Constantinos Sioutas; Todd E Morgan; Caleb E Finch; Henry Jay Forman
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 7.376

10.  The impact of nanomaterials in immune system.

Authors:  Jiyoung Jang; Dae-Hyoun Lim; In-Hong Choi
Journal:  Immune Netw       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.