Literature DB >> 20154117

Polyphasic analyses of methanogenic archaeal communities in agricultural biogas plants.

E Nettmann1, I Bergmann, S Pramschüfer, K Mundt, V Plogsties, C Herrmann, M Klocke.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the microbial consortia participating in the generation of biogas, especially in methane formation, is still limited. To overcome this limitation, the methanogenic archaeal communities in six full-scale biogas plants supplied with different liquid manures and renewable raw materials as substrates were analyzed by a polyphasic approach. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was carried out to quantify the methanogenic Archaea in the reactor samples. In addition, quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) was used to support and complete the FISH analysis. Five of the six biogas reactors were dominated by hydrogenotrophic Methanomicrobiales. The average values were between 60 to 63% of archaeal cell counts (FISH) and 61 to 99% of archaeal 16S rRNA gene copies (Q-PCR). Within this order, Methanoculleus was found to be the predominant genus as determined by amplified rRNA gene restriction analysis. The aceticlastic family Methanosaetaceae was determined to be the dominant methanogenic group in only one biogas reactor, with average values for Q-PCR and FISH between 64% and 72%. Additionally, in three biogas reactors hitherto uncharacterized but potentially methanogenic species were detected. They showed closest accordance with nucleotide sequences of the hitherto unclassified CA-11 (85%) and ARC-I (98%) clusters. These results point to hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis as a predominant pathway for methane synthesis in five of the six analyzed biogas plants. In addition, a correlation between the absence of Methanosaetaceae in the biogas reactors and high concentrations of total ammonia (sum of NH(3) and NH(4)(+)) was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20154117      PMCID: PMC2849221          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01423-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  45 in total

Review 1.  Molecular ecology of anaerobic reactor systems.

Authors:  J Hofman-Bang; D Zheng; P Westermann; B K Ahring; L Raskin
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.635

Review 2.  Perspectives for anaerobic digestion.

Authors:  Birgitte K Ahring
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.635

3.  probeBase: an online resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes.

Authors:  Alexander Loy; Matthias Horn; Michael Wagner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Accessing the black box of microbial diversity and ecophysiology: recent advances through polyphasic experiments.

Authors:  Gavin Collins; Siobhán Kavanagh; Sharon McHugh; Sean Connaughton; Aileen Kearney; Olivia Rice; Cora Carrigg; Colm Scully; Niamh Bhreathnach; Thérèse Mahony; Pádhraig Madden; Anne-Marie Enright; Vincent O'flaherty
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.269

5.  Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability.

Authors:  A Chao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Acetate oxidation is the dominant methanogenic pathway from acetate in the absence of Methanosaetaceae.

Authors:  Dimitar Karakashev; Damien J Batstone; Eric Trably; Irini Angelidaki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  A membrane-filter technique for the detection of complementary DNA.

Authors:  D T Denhardt
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1966-06-13       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  An update and optimisation of oligonucleotide probes targeting methanogenic Archaea for use in fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).

Authors:  Gregory Crocetti; Marika Murto; Lovisa Björnsson
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 2.363

10.  Archaea diversity within a commercial biogas plant utilizing herbal biomass determined by 16S rDNA and mcrA analysis.

Authors:  E Nettmann; I Bergmann; K Mundt; B Linke; M Klocke
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.772

View more
  37 in total

1.  Development and application of an enzymatic and cell flotation treatment for the recovery of viable microbial cells from environmental matrices such as anaerobic sludge.

Authors:  Florence Braun; Jérôme Hamelin; Gaëlle Gévaudan; Dominique Patureau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Mesophilic fermentation of renewable biomass: does hydraulic retention time regulate methanogen diversity?

Authors:  Niclas Krakat; Stefan Schmidt; Paul Scherer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Changing Feeding Regimes To Demonstrate Flexible Biogas Production: Effects on Process Performance, Microbial Community Structure, and Methanogenesis Pathways.

Authors:  Daniel Girma Mulat; H Fabian Jacobi; Anders Feilberg; Anders Peter S Adamsen; Hans-Hermann Richnow; Marcell Nikolausz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Investigation of methanogenic community structures in rural biogas digesters from different climatic regions in Yunnan, southwest China.

Authors:  Minghua Dong; Yan Wu; Qiumin Li; Guangliang Tian; Bin Yang; Yingjuan Li; Lijuan Zhang; Yongxia Wang; Wei Xiao; Fang Yin; Xingling Zhao; Wudi Zhang; Xiaolong Cui
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  BEAP profiles as rapid test system for status analysis and early detection of process incidents in biogas plants.

Authors:  Sarah Refai; Stefanie Berger; Kati Wassmann; Melanie Hecht; Thomas Dickhaus; Uwe Deppenmeier
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of bacterial and archaeal communities in household biogas digesters from tropical and subtropical regions of Yunnan Province, China.

Authors:  Guangliang Tian; Qiumin Li; Minghua Dong; Yan Wu; Bin Yang; Lijuan Zhang; Yingjuan Li; Fang Yin; Xingling Zhao; Yongxia Wang; Wei Xiao; Xiaolong Cui; Wudi Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Diversity of methane-cycling archaea in hydrothermal sediment investigated by general and group-specific PCR primers.

Authors:  Mark A Lever; Andreas P Teske
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  The effect of maize silage as co-substrate for swine manure on the bacterial community structure in biogas plants.

Authors:  K Fliegerová; J Mrázek; M Kajan; S M Podmirseg; H Insam
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.099

9.  Bioaugmentation of syntrophic acetate-oxidizing culture in biogas reactors exposed to increasing levels of ammonia.

Authors:  Maria Westerholm; Lotta Levén; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Identification of Methanoculleus spp. as active methanogens during anoxic incubations of swine manure storage tank samples.

Authors:  Maialen Barret; Nathalie Gagnon; Martin L Kalmokoff; Edward Topp; Yris Verastegui; Stephen P J Brooks; Fernando Matias; Josh D Neufeld; Guylaine Talbot
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.