Literature DB >> 19120632

Archaea diversity within a commercial biogas plant utilizing herbal biomass determined by 16S rDNA and mcrA analysis.

E Nettmann1, I Bergmann, K Mundt, B Linke, M Klocke.   

Abstract

AIMS: The Archaea diversity was evaluated in an agricultural biogas plant supplied with cattle liquid manure and maize silage under mesophilic conditions. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Two different genes (16S rRNA; methyl-coenzyme-M-reductase, MCR) targeted by three different PCR primer sets were selected and used for the construction of three clone libraries comprising between 104 and 118 clones. The clone libraries were analysed by restriction fragment polymorphism (RFLP). Between 11 and 31 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were detected and assigned to orders Methanomicrobiales, Methanosarcinales and Methanobacteriales. Over 70% of all Archaea OTUs belong to the order Methanomicrobiales which mostly include hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Acetotrophic methanogens were detected in minor rates. Similar relative values were obtained by a quantitative real-time PCR analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The results implied that in this biogas plant the most of the methane formation resulted from the conversion of H(2) and CO(2). SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study reports, for the first time, a molecular analysis of the archaeal community in this type of agricultural biogas plants. Therein the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis seems to be the major pathway of methane formation. These results are in contrast with the common thesis that in biogas fermentations the primary substrate for methanogenesis is acetate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19120632     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03949.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  22 in total

1.  Unexpected stability of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes communities in laboratory biogas reactors fed with different defined substrates.

Authors:  K Kampmann; S Ratering; I Kramer; M Schmidt; W Zerr; S Schnell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Polyphasic analyses of methanogenic archaeal communities in agricultural biogas plants.

Authors:  E Nettmann; I Bergmann; S Pramschüfer; K Mundt; V Plogsties; C Herrmann; M Klocke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Pyrosequencing of mcrA and archaeal 16S rRNA genes reveals diversity and substrate preferences of methanogen communities in anaerobic digesters.

Authors:  David Wilkins; Xiao-Ying Lu; Zhiyong Shen; Jiapeng Chen; Patrick K H Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Archaeal communities associated with roots of the common reed (Phragmites australis) in Beijing Cuihu Wetland.

Authors:  Yin Liu; Hong Li; Qun Fang Liu; Yan Hong Li
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  The effect of maize silage as co-substrate for swine manure on the bacterial community structure in biogas plants.

Authors:  K Fliegerová; J Mrázek; M Kajan; S M Podmirseg; H Insam
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Archaeal community dynamics in biogas fermentation at various temperatures assessed by mcrA amplicon sequencing using different primer pairs.

Authors:  Monika Vítězová; Jan Lochman; Martina Zapletalová; Stefan Ratering; Sylvia Schnell; Tomáš Vítěz
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Diversity of Anaerobic Methane Oxidizers in the Cold Seep Sediments of the Okinawa Trough.

Authors:  Ye Chen; Cuiling Xu; Nengyou Wu; Zhilei Sun; Changling Liu; Yu Zhen; Youzhi Xin; Xilin Zhang; Wei Geng; Hong Cao; Bin Zhai; Jing Li; Shuangshuang Qin; Yucheng Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Eubacteria and archaea communities in seven mesophile anaerobic digester plants in Germany.

Authors:  Christian Abendroth; Cristina Vilanova; Thomas Günther; Olaf Luschnig; Manuel Porcar
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Improvement of biogas production by bioaugmentation.

Authors:  K L Kovács; N Ács; E Kovács; R Wirth; G Rákhely; Orsolya Strang; Zsófia Herbel; Z Bagi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Novel molecular markers for the detection of methanogens and phylogenetic analyses of methanogenic communities.

Authors:  Lukasz Dziewit; Adam Pyzik; Krzysztof Romaniuk; Adam Sobczak; Pawel Szczesny; Leszek Lipinski; Dariusz Bartosik; Lukasz Drewniak
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.